Journals / İ M K B Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 40

İyi Kurumsal Yönetim Yapıları ve Üç Temel Ayağı: İç Kontrol, Risk Yönetimi ve Muhasebe Uygulamaları

Pages
39–67
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As good corporate governance structure refers to the full recognition of transparency or disclosure, more quality accounting practices will be, de facto, in place as well.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the research body of corporate governance which is one of the hot issues in the financial arena nowadays.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Paper suggests that, a good corporate governance state results in a better internal control and risk management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As good corporate governance structure refers to the full recognition of transparency or disclosure, more quality accounting practices will be, de facto, in place as well.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper examines the research body of corporate governance which is one of the hot issues in the financial arena nowadays. Discussing salient and current theoretical and empirical works in the stream, paper devotes a special emphasis to financial services industries. Paper implies that there is no perfection in governance theories, per se. Instead, all the theoretical approaches have pros over the others, therefore, should rather be considered to complement each other, when talking about the identification and quality of the governance style. Paper suggests that, a good corporate governance state results in a better internal control and risk management. As good corporate governance structure refers to the full recognition of transparency or disclosure, more quality accounting practices will be, de facto, in place as well.

Özet

Kurumsal Yönetim, günümüzde, finans alanının en popüler konularından birisidir. Bu nedenle, kurumsal yönetimle ilgili önemli ve güncel çalışmaları inceleyip kritik bakış açısıyla değerlendiren bu makale, mali sektörü de ayrı bir mercek altına almaktadır. Makalenin dayandığı tezlerden birisi, bahsi geçen ana kurumsal yönetim teorilerinin tek başlarına mükemmel olmadıkları, yönetimin kimliğini ve kalitesini belirlerken, bu yaklaşımların topluca düşünülmesi gerektiğidir. Makale, güçlü bir kurumsal yönetim yapısının daha iyi iç kontrol ve risk yönetimi anlamına geleceği iddiasındadır. Ayrıca, iyi kurumsal yönetim, şeffaflık veya açıklığı beraberinde getireceği için, organizasyonların daha kaliteli muhasebe uygulamalarına da vesile olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAŞ, R., ALP, A., KAYMAZ, Ö. (2022). İyi Kurumsal Yönetim Yapıları ve Üç Temel Ayağı: İç Kontrol, Risk Yönetimi ve Muhasebe Uygulamaları. İ M K B Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 40, 39–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/546395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Bailey, Warren, Rene M. Stulz, "Benefits of International Diversification: The Case of Pasific Basin Stock Markets," Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1990, ss. 57-61.
  2. Banz, Rolf W., "The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9, Issue 1, March 1981, ss. 3-18.
  3. Barry, Christopher B., John W. Peavy III, Mauricio Rodriguez, "Performance Characteristics of Emerging Capital Markets," Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1, January/February 1998, ss. 72-80.
  4. Bekaert, Geert, Campbell R. Harvey, "Foreign Speculators and Emerging Equity Markets, " The Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 2, April 2000, ss. 565-613.
  5. Bekaert, Geert, Campbell R. Harvey, Angela Ng, "Market Integration and Contagion, " The Journal of Business, Vol. 78, No. 1, January 2005, ss. 39-69.
  6. Benninga, Simon, Financial Modeling, Second Edition,
  7. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  8. Birkan, Elif, Portföy Seçimi: Uluslararası Hisse Senedi Portföylerine Uygulaması, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, SBE, 2006.
  9. Bodie, Zvi, Alex Kane, Alan J. Marcus, Investments, Sixth Edition,
  10. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005.
  11. Ceylan, Ali, Turhan Korkmaz; Sermaye Piyasası ve Menkul Değer Analizi, Üçüncü Baskı,
  12. Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 2006.
  13. Chen, Son-Nan, Cheng F. Lee, "The Effects of the Sample Size, The Investment Horizon and Market Conditions on the Validity of Composite Performance Measures: A Generalization," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, November 1986, ss. 1410-1421.
  14. Choi, Yoon K., Dong-soon Kim, "Determinants of American Depository Receipts and Their Underlying Stock Returns Implications for International Diversification," International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 9, 2000, ss. 351-368.
  15. Chunhachinda, Pornchai, vd., "Efficacy of Portfolio Performance Measures: An Evaluation, " Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 4, Autumn 1994, ss. 74-87.
  16. Cohen, Jerome B., Edward D. Zinbarg, Arthur Zeikel, Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, Fifth Edition,
  17. Irwin Publishing, Boston, 1987.
  18. Cosset, Jean-Claude, Jean-Marc Suret, "Political Risk and the Benefits of International Portfolio Diversification," Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1995, ss. 301-318.
  19. Divecha, Arjun B., Jaime Drach, Dan Stefek, "Emerging Markets: A Quantitative Perspective, " Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, Fall 1992, ss. 41-50.
  20. Dunis, Christian L., Gary Shannon, "Emerging Markets of So