Journals / İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53

The Construction and Application of Using a Scale to Measure Islamic Doctrinal Behavior Tendency

Pages
187–211
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show, also, that most students mix more than one doctrine in their application of purity and prayer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to construct and apply a scale to measure the doctrinal trends of a sample of Yarmouk University students, by using well-known doctrinal issues in purity and prayer topics from the four Islamic Sunni jurisprudence doctrines, namely, anafī, Mālikī, Shāfiī, and anbalī.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study adopted an inductive method to select the jurisprudential issues and analytical descriptive methodology and used the questionnaire as a method to build the syllabus and apply it to the sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show, also, that most students mix more than one doctrine in their application of purity and prayer.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to construct and apply a scale to measure the doctrinal trends of a sample of Yarmouk University students, by using well-known doctrinal issues in purity and prayer topics from the four Islamic Sunni jurisprudence doctrines, namely, anafī, Mālikī, Shāfiī, and anbalī. The study adopted an inductive method to select the jurisprudential issues and analytical descriptive methodology and used the questionnaire as a method to build the syllabus and apply it to the sample. The results of the study show that there are doctrinal distinctions between the students based on their home countries and regions. The results show, also, that most students mix more than one doctrine in their application of purity and prayer. More specifically, the results show that Jordanian students tend to use two doctrines, namely, anbalī and Shāfiī; the Turkish students tend to follow two doctrines, namely, anafī and Shāfiī; and Chinese students turn to three doctrines, namely, anafī, Shāfiī, and anbalī. In South African countries, students turn to Shāfiī in most cases and, then, Mālikī and anbalī in some cases. Thai and Malaysian students prefer Shāfiī in most cases.

🔖

Cite This Article

THALGI, M. J., ALGHONMEEN, O. A., ALSMADI, M. (2022). The Construction and Application of Using a Scale to Measure Islamic Doctrinal Behavior Tendency. İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53, 187–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/544404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adevî, âhâ. "Mefhûmu'-ât ve alâatuh-u bi't-teveccuhi'd-dînî ve'-alâbeti'nnefsiyye ledâ ayyine min ullâbi'l-câmi a". Mecelletü'l-irşâdi'n-nefsî 42 (Nisan 2015), 143-182. Alvânî, âhâ Câbir Feyyâż el-Edebu’l-i tilâf fi’l-İslâm. Virginia: el-Ma’hedü’l- ’âlemî li’l-Fikri’l-İslâmî, 1992.
  2. Erkuş, Adnan. "Ölçek Geliştirme ve Uyarlama Çalışmalarında Karşılaşılan Sorunlar". Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 13 (40) 2007, 17-25.
  3. Arıkan, Adem. "İslam Dünyasının Mezhep Haritası ve Nüfuz Dağılımı". Journal of Islamic Research 29/2 (2018), 79-348. Âsımî, Abdurramân b. Muammed. âşiyetu'r-ravżu’l-murbi‘ bi şer i zâdi’lmüstani‘. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1377/1397. Aslan, Mehmet Selim. İslam Hukuk Metodolojisinde "İstikrâ Yöntemi". İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi 3 (2019), 59-82. Aynî, Ebû Muhammad Bedreddîn. el-Binâye şer u’l-hidâye. Beyrut: Dâru’lKütübi’l- İlmiyye, 1420/1999. Berekât, Fâtima. "et-Tenebbu bit-tevecühi'd-dînî fî żev bażi's-sûlûkiyâti'lictimaiyyeti'l-îcâbiyye ledâ Ayyine min alebet Camiat 6 Oktuber". Mecelletu Kulliyeti't-Terbiye 4/34 ( ), 395-436.
  4. Beyaz, Rafet - Kaldık, Behçet. "Üniversite Gençliğinde Dindarlık ve Mutluluk İlişkisi: Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Örneği". Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 11/60 (2018), 621-632.
  5. Cirhinlioğlu, Fatma Gül. "Dini Yönelimler ve Önyargı". Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 7/1 (2010), 1367-1382. Cüveynî, Żiyâu’d-dîn Ebu’l-Me âlî. Nihâyetu’l-malab fî dirâyeti’l-meheb. Thk. Abdul aîm Mamûd ed-Dîb. Dımaşk: Dâru’l- âlem, 2007.
  6. Çatak, Bilge Deniz. "Mezhep Farklılıklarının Evli Çiftlerin İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkileri Berlin-İstanbul Örneği". Mediterranean Journal of Humanities 2 (2015), 179-201. Desûî, Muammed b. Amed b. Arefe el-Mâlikî (1815/11230). âşiyetü’d-Desûî ale’ş-şer i’l-kebîr. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, ts. Dihlevî, Şah Veliyyullah, el-İnâf fî beyâni sebebi’l-i tilâf. Thk. Abdulfettâ ebû Ġudde. Beyrut: Dâru’n- nefâ is, 1997. Fridâvî, Abduraîm. "et-Ta aub ve alaatuh bi'l-iltiami'd-dînî li-alebeti camiati Baġdâd". Mecelletü'l-Buhusi't-Terbeviyye ve’n-Nefsiyye 111 (2013), 612-568. Hafîf, Alî el-Esbâbu i tilâfi’l-fuahâ. Kahire: Dâru’l-Fikri’l-Arabî, 1996. Halîfe, Abdullaîf. " Alâatu't-a aubi'd-dinî ve'l-mehebî bi'ş-şaiyyeti uâdiyyeti'l- alîyye ledâ ullâbi'l-cem iyye." avliyyat Merkezü'l-bu ûs ve'ldirâsât'n-nefsiyye 2 (2006), 1-58. Harşî, Muammed b. Abdullah. Şer u mu tasar-ı alîl. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Kütübi’l- İlmiyye, 1422/2001. Hatîb Bağdadî. Ebû Bekir. el-Faîh ve'l-mütefaih.