Journals / İktisat Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 532

vulgarized economics discipline as an expression of technisict "class"lessness

teknisist "sınıfsız"lığın dışavurumu olarak bayağılaşan iktisat disiplini

Pages
4–24
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The banishment of class analysis has deprived contemporary economics of its analytical power and made it more and more vulgar.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contemporary economics discipline has long removed the concept of class and class-based analysis from its agenda and toolbox.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This orientation, by expelling the class based analysis, has reverberated a particular social class' scope and anxiety.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The banishment of class analysis has deprived contemporary economics of its analytical power and made it more and more vulgar.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Contemporary economics discipline has long removed the concept of class and class-based analysis from its agenda and toolbox. This has been the result of ideological orientation and ideological roots of the contemporary economics discipline. This orientation should be analyzed in the context of three mandatory dimensions of a particular ideological orientation - historicity, essentialism and teleologism. The objective of this study is to pursue such an analysis. Any analysis in these dimensions has revealed that, instead of being an ipso facto outcome, this orientation was an outcome of a conscious effort. This orientation, by expelling the class based analysis, has reverberated a particular social class' scope and anxiety. Any analysis directed towards the origins of contemporary economics discipline will certainly prove this. The banishment of class analysis has deprived contemporary economics of its analytical power and made it more and more vulgar.

Özet

Zamane iktisat disiplini sosyal sınıf kavramını ve sınıfsal analizi çok uzunca bir süredir gündeminden ve araç deposundan çıkarmış durumdadır. Bu tercih zamane iktisadının ideolojik yöneliminden ve kökenlerinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Bu yönelimi herhangi bir ideolojik yapılanmanın zorunlu üç boyutu -tarihselcilik, özcülük ve teleolojizm- üzerinden analiz etmek gerekir. Bu çalışmanın amacı bu türden bir analizdir. Bu üç boyuttaki analiz zamane iktisadının bu yöneliminin kazai bir durum olmadığını, daha baştan bilinçli bir yönelimin ürünü olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu yönelim sınıfsal analizi dışlarken belirli bir toplumsal sınıfın kaygılarını ve ufkunu yansıtmaktadır. Zamane iktisadının köklerine yönelik bir araştırma bunu kanıtlayacaktır. Sınıfsal analizin dışlanması ise zamane iktisadının analitik yeteneklerini budamakta ve onu bayağılaştırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHÇE, S. (2022). vulgarized economics discipline as an expression of technisict "class"lessness. İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 532, 4–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/544348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ackerman, F. ve A. Nadal (2004) The Flawed Foun- dations of General Equilibrium, New York: Routledge. Arrow, K.J. ve G. Debreu (1954) "Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy", Eco- nometrica, 22(3), 265-290.
  2. Arrow, K.J. ve F.H. Hahn (1991)
  3. General Competiti- ve Analysis, New York: North Holland. Bahçe, S. (2014) "John Atkinson Hobson: Sapkın, Haberci ve Unutulmuş", SBF Dergisi, 69(1), 1-41.
  4. Berns, W. (1975) "Two Mills and Liberty, (G. Him- melfarb'ın On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill başlıklı kitabı için ya- zılmış tanıtım yazısı), VQR online [http://www. vqronline.org/two-mills-and-liberty]. Blaug, M. (2002) "Ugly Currents in Modern Eco- nomics", Fact and Fiction in Economics (ed. Uskali Maki) içinde, New York: Cambridge University Press, 35-56.
  5. Boylan, T.A. ve P. F. O'Gorlan (1995) Beyond Rhe- toric and Realism in Economics: Towards a Reformulation of Economic Methodlogy, New York: Routledge. Charbit, Y. (2009)
  6. Economic, Social and Demograp- hic Thought in the XIXth Century: The Populati- on Debate from Malthus to Marx, Springer. Clarke, S. (1991)
  7. Marx, Marginalism and Socilogy, Londra: MacMillan. Cropsey, J. (1957) Polity and Economy: An Interp- retation of the Princples of Adam Smith, Ha- gue: Martinus Nijhof. Dillard, D. (1988) "The Barter Ilusion in Classcial and Neoclassical Economics", Eastern Econo- mic Journal, XIV(4), 299-318.
  8. Dobb, M. (1955 [1937]) "The Economic Basis of Class Conflict", On Economic Theory and So- cialism: Colected Essays içinde, Londra: Rout- ledge & Keegan Paul, 93-103.
  9. Dobb, M. (1977) Theories of Value and Distribution: Ideology and Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Fine, B. (2008) Zombieconomics: The Living Death of the Dismal Science in the Age of Neo Liberalism, ESRC Yeni Liberalizm Semineri için hazırlanmış çalışma [http://www.cppr.ac.uk/ centres/cppr/esrcneoliberalismseminar]. Foley, D. (2006) Adam's Falacy: A Guide to Eco- nomic Theology, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  11. Hilinger, C. (2006)
  12. Science and Ideology in Econo- mic, Political, and Social Thought, Munich Discussion Paper No. 2006-35,
  13. Department of Economics, Univer- sity of Munich. Hodgson, G. M. (2001) How Economics Forgot History - The problem of historical specificity in social science, Londra: Routledge. Hollander, S. (2000) "Ricardianism, J.S. Mil and the neoclassical challenge", John Stuart Mill on Economic Theory and Method: Colected Essays III içinde, New York: Routl