Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

THE INNOVATIVE GROUP LEARNING DESIGN: INSTRUCTIONAL GROUP ACTIVITIES

Journal
IOJET
Pages
356–377
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on these findings, positive andnegative aspects of the instructional group activities design for teacher training werediscussed, and some recommendations were presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Instructional Group Activities Design (IGAD) refers to activities which aim toimprove professional development and learning skills, in which a learning-centered teachingprocess is adopted and students study in small groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aimed to both introduce theIGAD and determine pre-service science teachers’ opinions on IGAs that were performedduring the practice hours of the course “Special Teaching Methods I.” In line with this aim,opinions of 56 pre-service science teachers on the practices were received.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on these findings, positive andnegative aspects of the instructional group activities design for teacher training werediscussed, and some recommendations were presented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Instructional Group Activities Design (IGAD) refers to activities which aim toimprove professional development and learning skills, in which a learning-centered teachingprocess is adopted and students study in small groups. The study aimed to both introduce theIGAD and determine pre-service science teachers’ opinions on IGAs that were performedduring the practice hours of the course “Special Teaching Methods I.” In line with this aim,opinions of 56 pre-service science teachers on the practices were received. An opinion form,which includes open and close-ended questions, was used as a data collection tool. Accordingto the results of the study, pre-service science teachers stated that the practice mostlycontributed to their professional and social development areas. Regarding the negativeaspects of the practices, pre-service science teachers underlined that they had difficultyregarding time and experienced certain group problems. Based on these findings, positive andnegative aspects of the instructional group activities design for teacher training werediscussed, and some recommendations were presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖREN, F. Ş. (2022). THE INNOVATIVE GROUP LEARNING DESIGN: INSTRUCTIONAL GROUP ACTIVITIES. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 356–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/542327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arias, A. M & Davis, E. A. (2017). Supporting children to construct evidence-based claims in science: Individual learning trajectories in a practice-based program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 204-218.
  2. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10-20. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/124416/Avalos_Beatrice.pdf?seq DOI: 10.1177/0022487109348479 (Retrieved from the website on September 4, 2017)
  3. Avraamidou, L. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers' science teaching orientations and experiences that impacted their development. International Journal of Science Education, 35 (10), 1698-1724. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.708945 Aydın, S., Demirdöğen, B., Tarkın, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akın, F.N., Tüysüz, M. & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ long-term professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97(6), 903–935.
  4. Balcı, A. (2007). Research in social sciences: Methods, techniques and principles. Ankara:
  5. PegemA Publishing. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 60(5), 497-511. http://sites.psu.edu/aplng587/wpcontent/ uploads/sites/8058/2015/12/Ball_Forzani_2009.pdf (Retrieved from the website on September 4, 2017)
  6. Birren, J. M & van den Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74-87. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Scientific research methods. Ankara:
  7. PegemA Publishing. Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 487-510. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2 CoHE (Yükseköğretim Kurulu) [YÖK] (2007). Education faculty teacher education degree programs [Eğitim fakültesi öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları.], Ankara. http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/30217/E%C4%9E%C4%B0T%C4%B0M+F AK%C3%9CLTES%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERETMEN+YET%C4%B0%C5% 9ET%C4%B0RME+L%C4%B0SANS+PROGRAMLARI.pdf/054dfc9e-a753-42e6- a8ad-674180d6e382 (Retrieved from the website on June 17, 2017)
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 3