Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF COMPETENCE RELATED TO RUBRICS AND THE PROBLEMS THEY CONFRONTf

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1239–1250
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that the teachers feltpartially adequate in preparing and applying rubric and scoring, and faced some difficulties inthese processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to determine the competencies and difficulties experiencedby science teachers in developing, using, and scoring rubrics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted with 71 science teachersworking in 12 different provinces of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that the teachers feltpartially adequate in preparing and applying rubric and scoring, and faced some difficulties inthese processes.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the competencies and difficulties experiencedby science teachers in developing, using, and scoring rubrics. For this purpose, the descriptivesurvey model was used in the research. This study was conducted with 71 science teachersworking in 12 different provinces of Turkey. The availability sampling method was used todetermine the sample of the study. A survey of 17 items developed by researchers was used todetermine teachers' views on the rubric. Personal information and Likert-type questions in thesurvey were analyzed with descriptive statistics. As a result, it was found that the teachers feltpartially adequate in preparing and applying rubric and scoring, and faced some difficulties inthese processes. It was determined that most science teachers had difficulty in understandingexplanations, deciding on the appropriate subject, deciding on the type of rubric to be used,and the criteria of performance to be measured when preparing the rubric. It was also revealedthat the limited level of knowledge of most teachers about rubrics partly affected their practicewith these tools. Finally, it was found that the teachers were always objective and tolerant whenscoring with rubrics, never giving close scores without looking at performance, sometimesaffecting the student's overall success in class and disciplinary behavior.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, P. (2022). TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF COMPETENCE RELATED TO RUBRICS AND THE PROBLEMS THEY CONFRONTf. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 1239–1250. https://ajindex.com/articles/542275

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acar, M. & Anıl, D. (2009). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin performans değerlendirme sürecindeki değerlendirme yöntemlerini kullanabilme yeterlikleri, karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. TUBAV Bilim Dergisi, 2(3), 354-3.
  2. Adanalı, K. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde alternatif değerlendirme: 5. sınıf sosyal bilgiler eğitiminin alternatif değerlendirme etkinlikleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Akbaş, Y. & Gençtürk, E. (2013). Coğrafya öğretmenlerinin alternatif ölçme-değerlendirme teknikleri ile ilgili görüşleri: kullanma düzeyleri, sorunlar ve sınırlılıklar. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 18(30), 331-335.
  3. Algan, S. (2008). İlköğretim 6. ve 7. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programının ölçme ve değerlendirme öğesinin öğretmen görüşleri açısından incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and theugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-31.
  4. Andrade, H. G. & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3). Andrade, H. G., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement, 27(2), 3–13.
  5. Andrade, H. G., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self efficacy for writing, The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-302.
  6. Bayat, S. & Şentürk, Ş. (2015). Fizik, kimya, biyoloji ortaöğretim alan öğretmenlerinin alternatif ölçme değerlendirme tekniklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 118-135.
  7. Brualdi, A. (1998). Performans assessment in the classroom. (ERIC Research Report: ED423312). Çetin, L. M. B. (2011). An investigation into the implementation of alternative assessment in the young learner classroom. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi,
  8. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  9. Demir, M. (2015). Türkiye ve ABD’de ilkokul 4. sınıf matematik dersi öğretim programında kullanılan alternatif değerlendirme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi,
  10. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Malatya, Türkiye. Duban, N. & Küçükyılmaz, E. A. (2008). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının alternatif ölçme değerlendirme yöntem ve tekniklerinin uygulama okull