SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Development of the rubric self-efficacy scale

Özen YILDIRIM
Perihan GÜNEŞ
Miraç YILMAZ
Pages
186–200
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, comparative studies on the intended use of rubrics can be conducted by determining teachers’ self-efficacy levels regarding rubrics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool determining teachers’ self-efficacy regarding rubrics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Determination of teachers’ self-efficacy regarding rubrics can give researchers an idea on how often and how accurately teachers use such tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, comparative studies on the intended use of rubrics can be conducted by determining teachers’ self-efficacy levels regarding rubrics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rubric · Teacher Efficacy Scale Development · Psychometric Properties

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool determining teachers’ self-efficacy regarding rubrics. Especially in educational environments, rubrics are measurement tools used in the assessment phase of student products usually based on higher-order thinking skills. Determination of teachers’ self-efficacy regarding rubrics can give researchers an idea on how often and how accurately teachers use such tools. For this reason, the existence of a tool accurately measuring self-efficacy variable is necessary. This study’s sample consists of 641 elementary, middle and high school teachers. To determine teachers’ self-efficacy levels regarding rubrics, 47-item draft was developed. As a result of validity and reliability analyzes, a 28-item measurement tool with a four-factor structure was obtained. The total scale’s and sub-factors’ internal consistency is quite high. Using this scale, researchers can examine the relationships between teachers’ self-efficacy and various variables that play an important role in education. In addition, comparative studies on the intended use of rubrics can be conducted by determining teachers’ self-efficacy levels regarding rubrics.

Özet

The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool determining teachers’ self-efficacy regarding rubrics. Especially in educational environments, rubrics are measurement tools used in the assessment phase of student products usually based on higher-order thinking skills. Determination of teachers’ self-efficacy regarding rubrics can give researchers an idea on how often and how accurately teachers use such tools. For this reason, the existence of a tool accurately measuring self-efficacy variable is necessary. This study’s sample consists of 641 elementary, middle and high school teachers. To determine teachers’ self-efficacy levels regarding rubrics, 47-item draft was developed. As a result of validity and reliability analyzes, a 28-item measurement tool with a four-factor structure was obtained. The total scale’s and sub-factors’ internal consistency is quite high. Using this scale, researchers can examine the relationships between teachers’ self-efficacy and various variables that play an important role in education. In addition, comparative studies on the intended use of rubrics can be conducted by determining teachers’ self-efficacy levels regarding rubrics.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, Ö., GÜNEŞ, P., YILMAZ, M. (2022). Development of the rubric self-efficacy scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 186–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/540226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching. 53(1). Andrade, H. G., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3). Andrade, H., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-302.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
  3. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, (4), 71-81. New York: Academic Press.
  4. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Byrne, B. M. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155-175.
  5. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: a study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490.
  6. Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing. Harper & Row. p. 161. Cureton, E. E. (1966). Corrected item-test correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 93-96.
  7. Elias, S., & Loomis, R. (2002). Utilizing need for cognition and perceived self-efficacy to predict academic performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(8), 1687- 1702. Guilford, J. P. (1953). The correlation of an item with a composite of the remaining items in a test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 87-93.
  8. Jerusalem, M. (2002).
  9. Theroretischer Teil - Einleitung I, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 44, 8-12.
  10. Jonsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39 (7), 840-852. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.875117 Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17-24.
  11. Likert, R. (1932). A Techniques for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-53.
  12. Metin, M. (2013). Öğretmenlerin performans görevlerini hazırlarken ve uygularken karşılaştığı sorunlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1645- 1673. Metin, M., & Özmen, H. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin performans değerlendirmeye yönelik hizmet içi eğitim (HİE) ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergis