Journals / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2009 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Termoekonomideki negentropi uygulaması üzerine hayali veya ekserji bileşenli akış

On the negentropy application in thermoeconomics: A fictitious or an exergy component flow

Pages
163–176
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper aims at opening a discussion about the procedure for negentropy application in thermoeconomics, by showing that: (i) the original procedure leads to some inconsistencies; and (ii), a more recent approach takes all the negentropy advantages, without leading to inconsistencies, by applying the negentropy as a physical exergy component flow.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The introduction of the negentropy in thermoeconomics represented a great advance in the discipline, since this magnitude allows quantifying the condenser product in a steam cycle plant, which was not possible before because the condenser is a dissipative component, whose product cannot be expressed in terms of exergy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, most authors have been applying the negentropy as a fictitious flow, joined up with the exergy flow.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper aims at opening a discussion about the procedure for negentropy application in thermoeconomics, by showing that: (i) the original procedure leads to some inconsistencies; and (ii), a more recent approach takes all the negentropy advantages, without leading to inconsistencies, by applying the negentropy as a physical exergy component flow.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The introduction of the negentropy in thermoeconomics represented a great advance in the discipline, since this magnitude allows quantifying the condenser product in a steam cycle plant, which was not possible before because the condenser is a dissipative component, whose product cannot be expressed in terms of exergy. However, most authors have been applying the negentropy as a fictitious flow, joined up with the exergy flow. This paper aims at opening a discussion about the procedure for negentropy application in thermoeconomics, by showing that: (i) the original procedure leads to some inconsistencies; and (ii), a more recent approach takes all the negentropy advantages, without leading to inconsistencies, by applying the negentropy as a physical exergy component flow.

Özet

Negentropinin termoekonomiye girişi bu disiplinde büyük bir ilerlemeyi temsil etmiştir çünkü bu büyüklük bir buhar çevrim santralindeki kondenser ürününün nicelendirilmesini sağlamıştır. Kondenser, ürünü ekserji açısından ifade edilemeyecek harcayıcı bir parça olduğundan bu daha önce olası değildi. Bununla birlikte çoğu yazar negentropiyi ekserji akışı ile birleşmiş hayali bir akış olarak uygulamaktadırlar. Bu makale termoekonomideki negentropi uygulaması prosedürü için (i) orijinal prosedürün bazı tutarsızlıklara yol açtığını ve (ii) yeni yaklaşımın tutarsızlıklara yol açmadan negentropiyi fiziksel ekserji bileşenli akış olarak uygulayarak tüm negentropi avantajlarını barındırdığını göstererek bir tartışma başlatmayı hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANTOS, J., NASCİMENTO, M., LORA, E., REYES, A. M. (2022). Termoekonomideki negentropi uygulaması üzerine hayali veya ekserji bileşenli akış. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 163–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/541943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alves, L. G. and Nebra, S. A., 2003, “Thermoeconomic Evaluation of a Basic Optimized Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycle”, Int. J. Thermodynamics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 13-22. Arena A. P. and Borchiellini R., 1999, “Application of Different Productive Structures for Thermoeconomic Diagnosis of a Combined Cycle Power Plant”, Int. J. Therm. Sci., Vol. 38, pp. 601-612.
  2. Çengel, Y. A. and Boles, M. A., 2006, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 5th ed, McGraw-Hill. El-Nashar, A. M., 2001, “Cogeneration for Power and Desalination – State of the Art Review”, Desalination, Vol. 134, pp. 7-28.
  3. Erlach, B., Serra, L. and Valero, A., 1999, “Structural Theory as Standard for Thermoeconomics”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 40, pp. 1627-1649.
  4. Frangopoulos, C. A., 1987, “Thermo-Economic Functional Analysis and Optimization”, Energy, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 563-571.
  5. Frangopoulos, C. A., 1994, “Application of the Thermoeconomic Functional Approach to the CGAM Problem”, Energy, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 323-342.
  6. Lazzaretto, A. and Tsatsaronis, G., 2006, “SPECO: Systematic and General Methodology for Calculating Efficiencies and Costs in Thermal Systems”, Energy, Vol. 31, pp. 1257-1289.
  7. Lozano, M. A., Valero, A. and Serra, L., 1993, “Theory of Exergetic Cost and Thermoeconomic Optimization”, Energy Systems and Ecology, Eds. J. Szargut, Z. Kolenda, G. Tsatsaronis and A. Ziebik, Cracow, Poland, Vol. 1, pp. 339-350.
  8. Lozano, M. A. and Valero, A., 1993, “Thermoeconomic Analysis of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration System”, ASME Book, No. H00874, WAM 1993,
  9. AES, Vol. 30, pp. 312-20.
  10. Lozano, M. A., Valero, A. and Serra, L., 1996, “Local Optimization of Energy Systems. Energy Systems Division”, ASME Book, No. G0122, Eds. A.B. Duncan, J. Fiszdon, D. O’Neal and K. Den Braven, Atlanta, pp. 241- 250. Moran M. J. and Shapiro, H. N., 2004, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Santos, J. J. C. S., Nascimento, M. A. R. and Lora, E. E. S., 2006, “On The Thermoeconomic Modeling for Cost Allocation in a Dual-Purpose Power and Desalination Plant”, Proceedings of ECOS 2006,
  11. Aghia Pelagia, Crete, Greece, Vol. 1, pp. 441-448.
  12. Santos, J. J. C. S., Nascimento, M. A. R., Lora, E. E. S. and Martínez Reyes, A. M, 2008a, “On The Productive Structure for the Residues Cost Allocation in a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant”, Proceedings of ECOS 2008,
  13. Cracow, Poland, Vol. 2, pp. 641-648.
  14. Santos, J. J. C. S., Nascimento, M. A. R., Lora, E. E. S. and Martínez Reyes, A. M.,