Journals / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Fuel part and mineral part of the thermoecological cost

Pages
187–190
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The first one is a simple demonstration example, the second is detailed and relates to the Polish energy system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The thermoecological cost, expressing the cumulative consumption of nonrenewable exergy per unit of the considered useful product, may be divided into the fuel part and the mineral part.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fuel part may be eliminated by the utilization of renewable exergy carriers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The first one is a simple demonstration example, the second is detailed and relates to the Polish energy system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:exergy of resources · cumulative consumption · depletion of resources

Abstract

The thermoecological cost, expressing the cumulative consumption of nonrenewable exergy per unit of the considered useful product, may be divided into the fuel part and the mineral part. The fuel part may be eliminated by the utilization of renewable exergy carriers. The mineral part cannot be eliminated. The depletion of mineral resources leads to the necessity of utilization of more and more lean natural resources. The equation system determining both parts of the thermoecological cost is formulated. Two numerical examples are included. The first one is a simple demonstration example, the second is detailed and relates to the Polish energy system.

🔖

Cite This Article

SZARGUT, J., STANEK, W. (2022). Fuel part and mineral part of the thermoecological cost. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 187–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/541865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Cornellisen R.L., Nimwegen P.A. van & Hirs G.G. (2000). Exergetic Life-Cycle Analysis. Proceedings ECOS,2000,
  2. Enshede, The Netherlands. El-Sayed Y. M. & Aplenc A. J. (1970). Application of the Thermoeconomic Approach to the Analysis and Optimization to the Vapour-Compression Desalting System. J. Eng. Power 92(1), 17-26. El-Sayed Y. M. & Evans R. B. (1970). Themoeconomics and the Design of Heat Systems. J. Eng. Power 92(1), 27- 35. Stanek W. (2009). Evaluation Method of the Ecological Effects in Thermal Processes Using the Exergy Analysis (in Polish), Edition of the Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice. Szargut J. (1978). Minimization of the Consumption of Natural Resources. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. ser. Techn. 6, 41- 45. Szargut J. (1986). Application of Exergy for the Calculation of Ecological Cost. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. ser. Techn. 7-8, 475-480.
  3. Szargut J. (1997). Depletion of Unrestorable Natural Exergy Resources. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. ser. Techn. 2, 241-259.
  4. Szargut J. (2004). Optimization of the Design Parameters Aiming at the Minimization of the Depletion of Non-renewable Resources. Energy, the Intern. Journ. 2161- 2169.