SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 149 - Sayı: 149

THE ASSESSMENT OF GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF TURKEY BY MEANS OF HEAT FLOW ESTIMATION

Uğur AKIN
Emin U. ULUGERGERLİ
Semih KUTLU
Pages
201–210
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thenecessity of conducting a detailed additional studies for East Black sea, East and SoutheastAnatolia is also revealed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the heat flow distribution of Turkey was investigated in the interest ofexploring new geothermal fields in addition to known ones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The averagevalue in the heat flow map of Turkey was determined as 74 mW/m2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thenecessity of conducting a detailed additional studies for East Black sea, East and SoutheastAnatolia is also revealed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Heat flow · Curie temperature · Curie point depth

Abstract

In this study, the heat flow distribution of Turkey was investigated in the interest ofexploring new geothermal fields in addition to known ones. For this purposes, thegeothermal gradient was estimated from the Curie point depth map obtained from airbornemagnetic data by means of power spectrum method. By multiplying geothermal gradientwith thermal conductivity values, the heat flow map of Turkey was obtained. The averagevalue in the heat flow map of Turkey was determined as 74 mW/m2. It points out existenceof resources of geothermal energy larger than the average of the world resources. in termsof geothermal potential, the most significant region of Turkey is the Aydin and itssurrounding with a value exceeding 200 mW/m2. On the contrary, the value decreasesbelow 30 mW/m2in the region bordered by Aksaray, Niğde, Karaman and Konya. Thenecessity of conducting a detailed additional studies for East Black sea, East and SoutheastAnatolia is also revealed

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, U., ULUGERGERLİ, E. U., KUTLU, S. (2014). THE ASSESSMENT OF GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF TURKEY BY MEANS OF HEAT FLOW ESTIMATION. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 149 - Sayı: 149, 201–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/54045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AFAD, 2014. T.C. Başbakanlık Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı Deprem Araştırma Dairesi Başkanlığı. 17 Nisan 2014, http://www.deprem.gov.tr/sarbis/Shared/Default.a spx Akın, U., Duru M. 2006. Türkiye Isı Akısı Haritası (manyetik verilerden) raporu. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Report No: 10840, Ankara (unpublished). Akın, U., Duru, M., Kutlu, S., Ulugergerli, E.U. 2006. Heat flow map of Turkey (from magnetic data). 17.Geophysical Congress, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara (in Turkish). Extended Abstract CD. Akın, U., Çiftçi, Y. 2011. Heat flow of the Kırşehir massif and geological sources of the radiogenic heat production. Bull. Min. Exp. Res., 143, 53-73.
  2. Aydın, İ., Karat, H.İ., Koçak, A. 2005. Curie-point depth map of Turkey. Geophys. J. Int. 162, 633-640.
  3. Bal, A. 2004. Aydın İzmir civarının hava manyetik verilerinden ısı akısı değerlerinin belirlenmesi ve ısı akısı dağılımının İncelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Jeofizik Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı. 141s., Ankara (unpublished). Bhattacharyya, B.K. 1965. Two dimensional harmonic analysis as a tool for magnetics interpretation. Geophysics 30, 829, 857. Bhattacharya, B.K. 1966. Continous spectrum of the total magnetic field anomaly due to a rectangular prismatic body, Geophysics, 31, 97-121.
  4. Bullard, E.C. 1939. Heat flow in South Africa. Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Ser. A., 173. 474-572.
  5. Ericson, A.J. 1970. The measurement and interpretation of heat flow in the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Ph. D. Thesis, Cambridge, Mass., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 272p. Fytikas, M.D. 1980. Geothermal exploration in Greece. 2nd. Int. Sem on the Results of E.C. Geothermal Energy Research, Strasbourgh. (eds) A.S. Strub ve P. Ungemanch, 213 – 237, Reidel Publ., Dordrecht. Fournier, R. O., Rowe, J. J. 1966. Estimation of underground temperatures from the silica content of water from hot springs and wet steam wells. Am. J. Sci., 264, 685-697.
  6. Fournier, R. O., Rowe, J. J. 1977. The solubility of amorphous silica in water at high temperatures and high pressures. American Mineralogist. Volume 62, pages 1052-1056.
  7. Gorshkov, G.S. 1972. Progress and problems in volcanology: Tectonophysics, 13, 1-4, 123-140.
  8. Göktürkler, G. 2002.
  9. Yerbilimlerinde, Isı Transferi Modellemesi: Kararlı-Hal Kondüktif Isı İletimi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 4, 3, 67-80.
  10. Gupta, M.L., Verma, R.K., Hazma V.M., Venkateshwar, Rao.G., Rao, R.U.M. 1970. Terrestri