Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

The Assessment of the Fifth-Grade Students’ Science Critical Thinking Skills through Design-Based STEM Education

Pages
690–714
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, developing and validating instruments to assess the integrated critical thinking skills will contribute to the empirical examination of this construct within the context of school science learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Critical thinking has been one of the 21st-century skills consistently associated with students’ future career advancement as a positive student outcome of STEM education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this design-based research study, the student’s modules were developed by the integrated STEM education principles involving the activities and worksheets in line with the frame of critical thinking approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, developing and validating instruments to assess the integrated critical thinking skills will contribute to the empirical examination of this construct within the context of school science learning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:STEM education · Science critical thinking · Design-based

Abstract

Critical thinking has been one of the 21st-century skills consistently associated with students’ future career advancement as a positive student outcome of STEM education. The aim of the study is to develop and validate science critical thinking skill instruments to assess the improvement in the subject of living organisms and force and friction through design-based STEM education. In this design-based research study, the student’s modules were developed by the integrated STEM education principles involving the activities and worksheets in line with the frame of critical thinking approach. The kappa statistics for content validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, and item and reliability analysis for the quality of items were used in the development stage of instruments. The results of these analyses endorsed the 15 two-tier item for each test of Living Things Critical Thinking (LTCT) and Measuring Force and Friction Critical Thinking (MFFCT) as unidimensional constructs to produce valid and reliable data to measure the fifth grade students' critical thinking skills in the related science content. Comparing the pre and post applications of instruments in the study group indicated that STEM modules improved the students’ science critical thinking skills such as interpretation, analysis, and inference. In this respect, developing and validating instruments to assess the integrated critical thinking skills will contribute to the empirical examination of this construct within the context of school science learning.

Özet

Critical thinking has been one of the 21st-century skills consistently associated with students’ future career advancement as a positive student outcome of STEM education. The aim of the study is to develop and validate science critical thinking skill instruments to assess the improvement in the subject of living organisms and force and friction through design-based STEM education. In this design-based research study, the student’s modules were developed by the integrated STEM education principles involving the activities and worksheets in line with the frame of critical thinking approach. The kappa statistics for content validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, and item and reliability analysis for the quality of items were used in the development stage of instruments. The results of these analyses endorsed the 15 two-tier item for each test of Living Things Critical Thinking (LTCT) and Measuring Force and Friction Critical Thinking (MFFCT) as unidimensional constructs to produce valid and reliable data to measure the fifth grade students' critical thinking skills in the related science content. Comparing the pre and post applications of instruments in the study group indicated that STEM modules improved the students’ science critical thinking skills such as interpretation, analysis, and inference. In this respect, developing and validating instruments to assess the integrated critical thinking skills will contribute to the empirical examination of this construct within the context of school science learning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doğan, H., Gencer, A. S. (2022). The Assessment of the Fifth-Grade Students’ Science Critical Thinking Skills through Design-Based STEM Education. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 690–714. https://ajindex.com/articles/540146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abdallah, M. M. S. & Wegerif, R. B. (2014). Design-based research (DBR) in educational enquiry and technological studies: A version for PhD students targeting the integration of new technologies and literacies into educational contexts. ERIC: ED546471. Retrieved 3, 2019, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546471.pdf
  2. Arıcak, O. T., Avcu, A., Topçu, F., & Tutlu, M. G. (2020). Use of item response theory to validate cyberbullying sensibility scale for university students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 18-29. Retrieved October 3, 2020, from https://dx.doi.org/10.21449/ijate.629584
  3. Asysyifa, D.S., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analysis of students critical thinking skills using partial credit models (PCM) in physics learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 245 253. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518068
  4. Awang, Z. (2012). A handbook on structural equation modeling using AMOS (6th Ed). Universiti Teknologi Mara Press:
  5. Malaysia. Baharin, N., Kamarudin, N., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2018). Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810–822. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4421
  6. Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 11(4), 361-375. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016042608621
  7. Beyer, B. K. (1995).
  8. Critical thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Brooks, G. P. & Johanson, G. A. (2003). TAP: Test analysis program. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 303-304.
  9. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  10. Bursal, M. (2017). SPSS ile temel veri analizleri. Ankara:
  11. Anı Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara:
  12. Pegem Akademi. Coaley, K. (2010). An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. London: Sage Publications. Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
  13. Deng, N., Wells, C., & Hambleton, R. (2008). A confi