SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation / 2019 / Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 3

Validation and application of the International Classification of Functioning core set for spinal cord injury in the Turkish patients

Hilmi Umut TATLI
Belma Füsun KÖSEOĞLU
Didem SEZGİN ÖZCAN
Sinem KOÇER AKSELİM
Asuman DOĞAN
Pages
244–258
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggestthat the application of ICF-Core Set in our patients provided us with a unique capability to assess their every aspect of disability, health andfunctioning

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to apply the Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-Core Set for spinal cord injury (SCI) -early post-acute-situation in the Turkish SCI patients and to investigate its construct validity.Patients and methods: One-hundred and twenty patients with SCI were included in this prospective and descriptive study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The percentage of participants and the frequency of the problems encountered at each level ofICF category were reported.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggestthat the application of ICF-Core Set in our patients provided us with a unique capability to assess their every aspect of disability, health andfunctioning
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to apply the Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-Core Set for spinal cord injury (SCI) -early post-acute-situation in the Turkish SCI patients and to investigate its construct validity.Patients and methods: One-hundred and twenty patients with SCI were included in this prospective and descriptive study. ICF data wereprimarily collected by conducting interviews with patients as well as from their acute medical management records, physical examinationfindings and laboratory measurements. The percentage of participants and the frequency of the problems encountered at each level ofICF category were reported. Furthermore, the construct validity was evaluated by calculating the Spearman correlation between the ICFcategories and other generic and disease specific measures.Results: The study illustrated that 55 of the 63 ICF categories of the Component Body Functions (CBF) and each and every category forthe Component Body Structures (CBS) as well as the Component Activities and Participation (CAP) were reported as a problem among theTurkish patients with SCI. Furthermore, 24 ICF categories for the Component Environmental Factors (CEF) were determined as a facilitatorwhile 6 ICF categories were identified as a barrier. The ICF–Core Set for SCI illustrated a high construct validity with some of the genericand disease-specific measures.Conclusion: Our results identified the common problems, complications and special needs in a Turkish population with SCI. We suggestthat the application of ICF-Core Set in our patients provided us with a unique capability to assess their every aspect of disability, health andfunctioning

🔖

Cite This Article

TATLI, H. U., KÖSEOĞLU, B. F., ÖZCAN, D. S., AKSELİM, S. K., DOĞAN, A. (2019). Validation and application of the International Classification of Functioning core set for spinal cord injury in the Turkish patients. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Cilt: 65 - Sayı: 3, 244–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/375176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kirshblum S, Brooks M. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injury. In: Gans B, Walsh N, Robinson L, editors. DeLisa’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 665-717
  2. Bryce TN. Spinal cord injury. In: Cifu DX, editor. Braddom’s, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2015. p. 1095-137
  3. Dawson J, Shamley D, Jamous MA. A structured review of outcome measures used for the assessment of rehabilitation interventions for spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46:768-80
  4. Alexander MS, Anderson KD, Biering-Sorensen F, Blight AR, Brannon R, Bryce TN, et al. Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions. Spinal Cord 2009;47:582-91
  5. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: 2001. p. 3-207
  6. Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004;44:9-11
  7. Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008;44:329-42
  8. Kirchberger I, Cieza A, Biering-Sørensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the early post-acute context. Spinal Cord 2010;48:297-304
  9. Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sørensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord 2010;48:305-12
  10. Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964;192:540-2
  11. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:311-9
  12. Hisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanterinin üniversite öğrencileri için geçerliği, güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi 1989;7:3-13
  13. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989;46:1121-3
  14. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83
  15. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A. The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the