Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Resource based view in the Turkish construction sector and resource selection with ANP technique

Pages
40–47
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the data processed with the Super Decisions software provides numerical and quantitative comparisons of resources in the construction sector, it also points to a selected set of resources that can work with BIM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The competitive environment observed in the international construction sector has reflected in the Turkish construction sector through joint projects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to achieve competitive advantage in joint construction projects and to achieve success against national competitors, it is necessary to review resource selection strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the data processed with the Super Decisions software provides numerical and quantitative comparisons of resources in the construction sector, it also points to a selected set of resources that can work with BIM.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ANP · Building information · Modelling

Abstract

The competitive environment observed in the international construction sector has reflected in the Turkish construction sector through joint projects. In order to achieve competitive advantage in joint construction projects and to achieve success against national competitors, it is necessary to review resource selection strategies. In this context, the main purpose of this study is to look at the resource selection criteria of the construction companies in terms of International Resource-Based Theory. The 77 resources of the construction firms reviewed during this study were evaluated by taking into consideration their ability to be strategic resource and their competitive advantages. In this study, the Building Information Modelling (BIM) tools and technique, which has been spoken as a resource that will benefit competition in Turkey in recent years, was discussed as an objective and the research problem was whether BIM is a strategic resource or not. In the resource evaluation process, resources should be listed and evaluated by firm employees and managers. In the survey conducted for this purpose, construction firms were asked to select the resources they already had from the resource pool of the research and to score only 9 important resources. To establish vertical hierarchy and horizontal relationships, the obtained results of the evaluation were analyzed by using the Analytical Network Process (ANP) method. In the established hierarch, the objective was BIM and the selection criteria were VRIO criteria including Valuable, Rare, Inimitable and Organization, which are the resource selection criteria of the Resource-Based Theory. The scores obtained as a result of the survey study applied to the Turkish construction firms were reflected to the ANP technique. While the data processed with the Super Decisions software provides numerical and quantitative comparisons of resources in the construction sector, it also points to a selected set of resources that can work with BIM.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEYLANİ, Ö., DİKBAŞ, H. A. (2022). Resource based view in the Turkish construction sector and resource selection with ANP technique. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 40–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/539376

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barney, J.B., Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991. 17: 99–120
  2. Barney, J.B., Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 2001. 27: 643–650
  3. Barney, J.B., "Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-Year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View. Journal of Management, 2001. 27: 643–650
  4. Chandler, A., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. 1962, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  5. Penrose, E., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. 1959, London: Basil Blackwell
  6. Porter, M.E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. 1980, New York: The Free Press
  7. Rumelt, R.P., Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm.” In “Competitive Strategic Management. 1984, ed. R.B. Lamb, pp 566–70. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  8. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. 1996, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 24–29
  9. Saaty, T.L., Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. International Symposium AHP 1999, Japan, 13–16
  10. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making For Leaders. 2000, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 47– 52
  11. Selznick, P., Leadership and Administration.1957, Harper & Row: New York
  12. Wernerfelt, B., Small forces and large firms: Foundations of the RBT. Strategic Management Journal, 2013. 34(6): 635–643.