Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types

Pages
60–64
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it is seen that yarns produced by US cotton have less contamination than the yarns produced by local cotton.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contamination on cotton fibers is one of the most important problems that shows itself on yarn and fabric.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Contamination usually consists of plant leafs, parts, etc. on the cotton and this situation occurs during the harvesting and transporting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it is seen that yarns produced by US cotton have less contamination than the yarns produced by local cotton.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Contamination · Cotton Fiber · Yarn

Abstract

Contamination on cotton fibers is one of the most important problems that shows itself on yarn and fabric. Contamination usually consists of plant leafs, parts, etc. on the cotton and this situation occurs during the harvesting and transporting. Also contamination occurs by bale pieces such as burlap, nylon and polypropylene residues. Developed technologies are using for selection of the foreign material in blowroom and bobbin processes, but it is not possible to completely remove the foreign material from the yarn. In general, the amount of foreign material in the local cotton is more than the US cotton. In this study, yarn production is made in the same specifications with local and US cotton, then yarn foreign material cuttings on bobbin machine and yarn quality values are compared. According to the results, it is seen that yarns produced by US cotton have less contamination than the yarns produced by local cotton. With this situation it is determined that, despite less contamination, yarn technical values of US cotton is worse than local cotton.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, Y., FİDAN, G. (2022). Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 60–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/539370

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Gencer, O., Özüdoğru, T., Kaynak, M. A., Yılmaz, A., & Ören, N. Türkiye’de pamuk üretimi ve sorunları, TMMOB, Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası, Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisligi, VI. Teknik Kongresi 2005
  2. Kaya H., Dolunçay A., Toklu P., Türkoglu S., Nasırcı Z., Süllü S., Özbek B., Adana, Kahramanmaraş ve Gaziantep illerinde pamuk ipliği üretimi yapan tekstil işletmelerinin genel durumu, pamuk lifine ilişkin kalite beklentileri, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Tekstil ve Mühendis. 2006. 13(62-63): p. 1-15
  3. Anonim, Itmf: Pamukta Kontaminasyon Oranı Arttı, [cited 2017 05 October]; Available from:
  4. Uster®, On-Line Quality Management on Bobbin Machines, Uster Quantum 2 Manuel Application,2009
  5. Uster®, Modern Yarn Cleaning on Bobbin Machines, Uster News Bulletin, No:48, September 2011
  6. International Trade Centre, Cotton Exporter’s Guide, [cited 2018 20 July]; Available from: http://www.cottonguide.org/