Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Effect of polymer and surfactant concentrations on PVP nanofibers morphology

Pages
99–105
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the density of polymer solutions increased with both polymer solution and surfactant concentration increasement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, biocompatible polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) based nanofiber production was carried out with various polymer and surfactant concentrations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firstly; various concentrations of PVP (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 wt %) polymer solutions were prepared, solution properties (conductivity, viscosity, surface tension, pH and density) were determined and nanofiber production was achieved under the optimum process parameters. 12 wt % PVP concentration was chosen as an optimum in terms of nanofiber morphology and fiber fineness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the density of polymer solutions increased with both polymer solution and surfactant concentration increasement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Electrospinning · Nanofiber · Polyvinylpyrrolidone

Abstract

In this study, biocompatible polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) based nanofiber production was carried out with various polymer and surfactant concentrations. Firstly; various concentrations of PVP (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 wt %) polymer solutions were prepared, solution properties (conductivity, viscosity, surface tension, pH and density) were determined and nanofiber production was achieved under the optimum process parameters. 12 wt % PVP concentration was chosen as an optimum in terms of nanofiber morphology and fiber fineness. Then, polymer concentration was kept constant at 12 wt % and various concentrations of surfactant (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 wt %) added into the polymer solutions. According to the solution properties and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images; conductivity, viscosity and average fiber diameter increased with polymer and surfactant concentrations increasement and ultra-fine, bead free and uniform nanofibers were obtained. On the other hand, surface tension and pH values were affected by polymer concentration changing, however, surface tension decreased significantly and pH decreased slightly with the addition of surfactant to the PVP polymer solution. Moreover, the density of polymer solutions increased with both polymer solution and surfactant concentration increasement.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, H. K., ÇALLIOĞLU, F. C. (2022). Effect of polymer and surfactant concentrations on PVP nanofibers morphology. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 99–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/539335

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Subbiah, T., et al., Electrospinning of nanofibers. Journal of applied polymer science, 2005. 96(2): p. 557-569
  2. Tucker, N., et al., The history of the science and technology of electrospinning from 1600 to 1995. Journal of engineered fibers and fabrics, 2012. 7(2_suppl): p. 155892501200702S10
  3. Bhardwaj, N., and S.C. Kundu, Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnology advances, 2010. 28(3): p. 325-347
  4. Dhandayuthapani, B., U.M. Krishnan, and S. Sethuraman, Fabrication and characterization of chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofibers for skin tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2010. 94(1): p. 264-272
  5. Salles, T.H.C., C.B. Lombello, and M.A. d'Ávila, Electrospinning of gelatin/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) blends from water/acetic acid solutions. Materials Research, 2015. 18(3): p. 509-518
  6. Deitzel, J.M., et al., The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer, 2001. 42(1): p. 261-272
  7. Lubasova, D. and L. Martinova, Controlled morphology of porous polyvinyl butyral nanofibers. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2011
  8. Shao, H., et al., Effect of electrospinning parameters and polymer concentrations on mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion of randomly-oriented electrospun poly (vinylidene fluoride) nanofiber mats. RSC advances, 2015. 5(19): p. 14345-14350
  9. Tarus, B., et al., Effect of polymer concentration on the morphology and mechanical characteristics of electrospun cellulose acetate and poly (vinyl chloride) nanofiber mats. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016. 55(3): p. 2975-2984
  10. Thompson, C., et al., Effects of parameters on nanofiber diameter determined from electrospinning model. Polymer, 2007. 48(23): p. 6913-6922
  11. Veleirinho, B., M.F. Rei, and J. Lopes‐DA‐Silva, Solvent and concentration effects on the properties of electrospun poly (ethylene terephthalate) nanofiber mats. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 2008. 46(5): p. 460-471
  12. He, J.-H., et al., Electrospun nanofibres and their applications. 2008: ISmithers Shawbury, UK
  13. Ramakrishna, S., et al., An introduction to electrospinning and nanofibers. 2005. Singapura: World Scientific Publishing Company
  14. Rachmawati, H., et al., The in vitro–in vivo safety confirmation of peg-40 hydrogenated castor oil as a surfactant for oral nanoemulsion formulation. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 2017. 85(2): p. 18
  15. Fallahi, D., M. Rafi