Journals / Human Rights Review / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15

COMMUNITY AND LAW: IDENTFYING THE LOCUS OF LAW IN COMMUNITY

Toplum ve Hukuk: Hukukun Toplum İçindeki Konumunu Belirlemesi

Pages
63–79
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Iwill explicate the different componentsthat comprises the “community andlaw approach” and will stress theimportance in locating the law withinsuch a community.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:“Community and law approach”provides an illuminating insight intoalternative legal orderings within asocial unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article,I will elaborate briefly on the existingliterature on Legal Pluralism and willdevelop on how to commence witha “community and law approach” byretrieving legal norms in communities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Iwill explicate the different componentsthat comprises the “community andlaw approach” and will stress theimportance in locating the law withinsuch a community.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

“Community and law approach”provides an illuminating insight intoalternative legal orderings within asocial unit. The comprehensiveness oflegal systems within a community or asocial unit provides a suitable basis fora structural framework of alternativelegal systems or Legal Pluralism, whichis missing in the discourse on LegalPluralism. Identifying the locus of lawwithin a community”, provides us withan indication on how autopoietic a legalsystem can be within a social unit, takinginto account the social rootedness oflegal norms. Legal norms emanate froman organizational framework in whichlegal norms are situated. In this article,I will elaborate briefly on the existingliterature on Legal Pluralism and willdevelop on how to commence witha “community and law approach” byretrieving legal norms in communities. Iwill explicate the different componentsthat comprises the “community andlaw approach” and will stress theimportance in locating the law withinsuch a community.

Özet

“Toplum ve hukuk yaklaşımı” bir sosyal birim içerisinde alternatif yasal düzenlemelerin aydınlatıcı iç yüzünü anlamayı sağlar. Bir toplumda ya da sosyal birimdeki yasal sistemerin kapsayıcılığı, hukuki çoğulculuk söyleminde eksik bulunan, alternatif yasal sistemlerin ya da hukuki çoğulculuğun yapısal çerçevesi için uygun bir temel oluşturmaktadır. “Bir toplum içinde hukukun yerini belirleme” bize hukuk normlarının sosyal kökleri dikkate alınarak yasal bir sistemin sosyal bir birim içerisinde nasıl var olabileceğinin göstergesini sağlar. Hukuk normları içlerinde bulunduklar yasal çerçeveden kaynaklanır. Bu çalışmada hukuki çoğulculuk literatürü kısa ve özlü bir biçimde açıklanacak ve “toplum ve hukuk yaklaşımı”nın hukuk normlarının yeniden dönüştürerek toplumlara kazandırılması bu konu hakkında katkı sağlamaya çalışılacaktır. “Toplum ve hukuk yaklaşımı”ndan oluşan farklı bileşenler açıklanacak ve böyle bir toplumda yasanın toplum içinde konumunun belirlenmesindeki önem vurgulanacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLALI, M. (2022). COMMUNITY AND LAW: IDENTFYING THE LOCUS OF LAW IN COMMUNITY. Human Rights Review, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 15, 63–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/538183

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Brint Steven, Gemeinschaft Revistied: A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept, V.19, Issue. 1., Washington DC, 2001.
  2. Cotterel Roger, A Legal Concept of Community, Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, V. 12, Issue. 2, Cambridge, 1997.
  3. Cotterel, Roger, Law’s Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997. Durkheim Emile (transl. By Joseph Ward Swain), The Elementary form of Religious Life, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, 1964. Emile Durkheim (Ed. Emirbayer Mustafa / Cohen Ira J), Emile Durkheim: Sociologist of Modernity, Blackwell Publishing, New Jersey, 2008.
  4. Glatzer Bernt, The Pashtun Tribal System, Contemporary Society: Tribal Studies, V.5, New Delhi, 2002.
  5. Greif Avner, Impersonal Exchange Without Impartial Law: The Community Responsibility System, Chicago Journal of International Law, V.5 Issue.1, Chicago 2008.
  6. Kahan Dan M., The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and Law, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 102, Issue. 71, Michigan, 2003.
  7. Rheinstein, M., Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, (ed., Max Rheinstein and Edward Shils trans., Free Press 1954) (1925).
  8. Mnookin, Robert H., Alternative Dispute Resolution, (Ed. Peter Newman), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Stockton Press, New York 1998.
  9. Nelken David, Eugen Ehrlich, Living Law, and Plural Legalities, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, V. 9, Issue. 2., Tel Aviv, 2008.
  10. Oakes Guy, Max Weber on Value Rationality and Value Spheres, Journal of Classical Sociology, V. 3, Issue. 1, London, 2003.
  11. Olson Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, 1965.
  12. Parsons Talcott, Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory, Glencoe, III.: Free Press, Illinois, 1961. Plessner Helmuth/ König René/ Gusfield Joseph R., Grenzen der Gemeinschaft, https://www.academia.edu/30730370/Grenzen_der_Gemeinschaft._ Helmuth_Plessner_Ren%C3%A9_K%C3%B6nig_und_Joseph_R._Gusfield Portes Alejandro, Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology Annual Review of Sociology, V. 24, Issue. 1, Massachusetts, 1998.
  13. Reiss Maria, The Materialization of Legal Pluralism in Britain: Why Shari’a Council Decisions should be non-binding?, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, V. 26, Issue. 3, Arizona, 2009.
  14. Sampson Robert J., Linking the Micro- and Macrolevel Dimensions of Community Social Organization, Social Forces, V.70, Issue. 1. Oxford, 1991. Shayk