SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Human Rights Review / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14

CJEU and ECtHR: Two Sides of the Same Coin or Different Currencies ?

ABAD ve AİHM: Bir madalyonun iki yüzü mü yoksa iki farklı para birimi mi?

Begüm BULAK UYGUN
Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An overall appraisalof the cohabitation of these two judicialpowerhouses will be made by referenceto the state of human rights protectionwithin the regional mechanisms andtheir impact at national level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The protection of fundamentalhuman rights across Europe remindsthe issue of the European Union (EU)accession to the European Conventionon Human Rights (ECHR).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysisof the interaction between the Courtof Justice of the European Union (CJEU)and the European Court of HumanRights (ECtHR) is essential for a betterunderstanding of the multi-layeredhuman rights architecture in Europe.With reference to multi-levelcomponents, this study focus on thefollowing issues in order to find outwhether the CJEU and ECtHR consisttwo sides of the same coin - meaningthat they adjudicate human rights inthe same way - or if they constitutedifferent currencies – meaning thatthey have different impacts in humanrights protection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An overall appraisalof the cohabitation of these two judicialpowerhouses will be made by referenceto the state of human rights protectionwithin the regional mechanisms andtheir impact at national level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The protection of fundamentalhuman rights across Europe remindsthe issue of the European Union (EU)accession to the European Conventionon Human Rights (ECHR). The analysisof the interaction between the Courtof Justice of the European Union (CJEU)and the European Court of HumanRights (ECtHR) is essential for a betterunderstanding of the multi-layeredhuman rights architecture in Europe.With reference to multi-levelcomponents, this study focus on thefollowing issues in order to find outwhether the CJEU and ECtHR consisttwo sides of the same coin - meaningthat they adjudicate human rights inthe same way - or if they constitutedifferent currencies – meaning thatthey have different impacts in humanrights protection. An overall appraisalof the cohabitation of these two judicialpowerhouses will be made by referenceto the state of human rights protectionwithin the regional mechanisms andtheir impact at national level.

Özet

Avrupa genelinde temel insan haklarının korunması, Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB) Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’ne (AİHS) katılımı konusunu akla getirmektedir. Avrupa’daki çok katmanlı insan hakları mimarisinin daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi için Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı (ABAD) ile Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM) arasındaki etkileşimin analizi gereklidir. Mevcut farklı bileşenlere ilişkin olarak, bu çalışma kapsamında ABAD ve AİHM’nin bir madalyonun iki tarafını mı oluşturdukları (insan haklarını aynı şekilde yargıladıkları varsayımı) – ya da iki farklı para birimini mi teşkil ettikleri (insan haklarının korunmasında farklı yaklaşım ve etkilere sahip oldukları varsayımı) – konularına odaklanılmakta ve değerlendirmede bulunulmaktadır. Sözkonusu iki yargı organının birlikte varoluşunun genel değerlendirilmesi, insan haklarının bölgesel mekanizmalar dâhilinde korunmasının ulusal seviyedeki etkileri referans alınarak yapılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYGUN, B. B. (2022). CJEU and ECtHR: Two Sides of the Same Coin or Different Currencies ?. Human Rights Review, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/538174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Andreakadis S., “The European Convention on Human Rights, the EU and the UK: Confronting a Heresy: A Reply to Andrew Williams”, EJIL 24 (2013), No.4, 1187-1193. Bianco G. and Martinico G., “Dialogue or Disobedience ? On the Domestic Effects of the ECHR in Light of the Kamberaj Decision”, European Public Law 20, no. 3 (2014) 435-450. Bryde B.-O., “The ECJ’s Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence – A milestone in Transnational Constitutionalism” in M. Poiares Maduro and L.Azoulai (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law. The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010). Callewaert J., “The European Convention on Human Rights and European Union Law: A Long Way to Harmony”, EHRLR 6 (2009).
  2. Callewaert J., The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights, (COE 2013). Carozza P. G., “Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law”, 97 AJIL (2003) 38-79. Carozza P. G., “The Charter and the Member States”, in S. Peers and A.Ward (eds) The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: Context and Possibilities (2003). Christoffersen J., “Fair balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights”, International Studies in Human Rights, vol 99, (Martinus Nijhoff 2009). Claes M. and de Visser M., “The Court of Justice as a Federal Constitutional Court: A Comparative Perspective” in E. Cloots, G. De Baere and S. Sottiaux (eds.), Federalism in the European Union (Hart 2012) 83, 102. De Burca G., “After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator ?”, 20 MJ 2 (2013), 168-184. De Schutter O., “Bosphorus Post-Accession: Redefining the relationships between the European Court of Human Rights and the Parties to the Convention”, in V.Kosta, N. Skoutaris and V. P Tzevelokos (eds), The EU Accession to the ECHR, (Hart 2014), 177-198. Delmas-Marty M., “« A reasoned » Conception of the Reason of State”, in The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, International Protection versus National Restrictions, (Martinus Nijhoff 1992). Dzehtsiarou K., “European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights”, German Law Journal, 12 (2011).
  3. Dzehtsiarou K., European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights, (CUP 2015).
  4. Fabbrini F., Fundamental Rights in Europe, Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective, (OUP 2014). Fabb