Journals / Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Dietary Exposure Assessment of Aflatoxin From Dried Figs in Turkey

Pages
173–177
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Calculated MOE and population risk according to estimated daily intake revealed that Turkish adult population are not under the toxicological risk through dried fig consumption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aflatoxins are fungi’s secondary toxigenic metabolites and known as potent hepatocarcinogen for humans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to make this evaluation total of 23.547 aflatoxin monitoring data of dried figs from the Turkish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock between the crop years of 2011/2012-2015/2016 in Turkey were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Calculated MOE and population risk according to estimated daily intake revealed that Turkish adult population are not under the toxicological risk through dried fig consumption.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aflatoxin · Dietary Intake · Risk Assessment

Abstract

Aflatoxins are fungi’s secondary toxigenic metabolites and known as potent hepatocarcinogen for humans. The purpose of the present study is to assess health risk for Turkish adult population posing by dried fig consumption due to the aflatoxin contamination. In order to make this evaluation total of 23.547 aflatoxin monitoring data of dried figs from the Turkish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock between the crop years of 2011/2012-2015/2016 in Turkey were used. Intakes were estimated using consumption data and aflatoxin concentrations and expressed using the average Turkish adults’ body weight 72.8 kg . Estimated daily exposure was found 0.005 ng/kg bw/day for aflatoxin B1 , 0.009 for total aflatoxins in a worst case scenario. The calculated margin of exposure MOE was higher than the 10.000. Cancer risk in Turkish adult population observed in the range between 0.00017 to 0.00030 cancers per 100,000 people per year. Calculated MOE and population risk according to estimated daily intake revealed that Turkish adult population are not under the toxicological risk through dried fig consumption.

🔖

Cite This Article

İmge, H. (2022). Dietary Exposure Assessment of Aflatoxin From Dried Figs in Turkey. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 173–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/537989

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. INC, International Nut and Dried Fruit Council. Nuts and Dried Fruits Statistical yearbook 2017/2018 (2017). https://www. nutfruit.org/files/tech/1524481168_INC_Statistical_ Yearbook_2017-2018.pdf Access date 24.07.2018 2. Scott, PM, Trucksess, MW. Prevention of mycotoxins in dried fruit, other fruit products, and botanicals, in: Appell, M, Kendra, D F, Trucksess, MW (Eds.). Mycotoxin prevention and control in agriculture. ACS Symposium Series, Washington DC. 1031 pp. 17–35, 2009. 3. Richard, JL. Some major mycotoxins and their mycotoxicoses-An overview. International J Food Microbiol 119 (1–2) (2007) 3–10. 4. IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Some naturally occuring substances: Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks of chemicals to humans vol 56 Lyon, France, 1993 https:// monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ mono56.pdf Access date 24.07.2018 5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain on a request from the European Commission related to the potential increase of consumer health risk by a possibleof the existing maximum levels for aflatoxins in almonds, hazelnuts and pistachios and derived products. The EFSA Journal 446 (2007) 1-127. 6. JECFA. Evaluations of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. WHO Food additives Series, vol. 40. (1998)
  2. IPCS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 7. JECFA. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Forty-ninth Report. Technical Report Series No. 884. Geneva: WHO. (1999) pp 69–77. 8. Liu Y, Wu F. Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: A risk assessment. Environmental Health Perspective 118 (6) (2010) 818–824. 9. Scientific Committee for Food (SCF). European Commission DG XXIV Unit B3. Thirty-fifth Report. Opinion on aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2, M1 and patulin. Expressed on 23 September 1994. 10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry: action levels for poisonous or deleterious substances in human food and animal feed. (2000) Available at: https:// www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocuments RegulatoryInformation/ChemicalContaminantsMetalsNatural ToxinsPesticides/ucm077969.htm#afla Access: 14/11/18 11. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). Report of the sixth session of the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods, 35th session. July 2-7, 2012. (2012)
  3. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at: http