SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Mercury Removal from Glycine Leach Solutions Using Sodium Sulfide (Na2S) Precipitation

Sadiye Kantarcı(SIRNAK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING)0000-0002-1024-0812
İbrahim Alp(KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING)0000-0002-6032-3528
Youpoungam Abdou Azizi0000-0003-3143-4509
Salih Sıvırcık(GUMUSHANE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING)0009-0002-4207-385X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that Na₂S dosage was the most effective parameter in mercury removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amino acid leaching has been considered an environmentally friendly alternative for gold recovery; however, the dissolution of mercury (Hg) during the leaching of amalgamation tailings remains a major challenge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is a novelty study that focuses on Hg removal by passing the Hg-containing tailings, previously processed by amalgamation, into solution via glycine (NH2CH2COOH) leaching.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that Na₂S dosage was the most effective parameter in mercury removal.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glycine · Heavy Metal Immobilization · Sulfide Precipitation

Abstract

Amino acid leaching has been considered an environmentally friendly alternative for gold recovery; however, the dissolution of mercury (Hg) during the leaching of amalgamation tailings remains a major challenge. This study is a novelty study that focuses on Hg removal by passing the Hg-containing tailings, previously processed by amalgamation, into solution via glycine (NH2CH2COOH) leaching. In this regard, a precipitation method using sodium sulfide (Na₂S) was developed to remove Hg from solutions obtained after glycine leaching. The effects of precipitation time, pH, Na2S dosage, and temperature were investigated. The effects of pH, precipitation time, and temperature were found to be limited within the investigated ranges. The results showed that Na₂S dosage was the most effective parameter in mercury removal. The initial Hg concentration of 12,160 ppb was reduced to 223 ppb at a Na₂S:Hg molar ratio of 60, corresponding to approximately 98% removal efficiency under the selected operating conditions. Increasing the Na₂S:Hg ratio to 80 resulted in a slightly higher removal efficiency (~99%) with a final Hg concentration of 144 ppb; however, a ratio of 60 was considered optimal in terms of reagent consumption and process efficiency. The outcomes indicate that Hg removal with Na₂S is a rapid and effective process under alkaline conditions, while Au remains in solution and Cu and Ag are partially removed, indicating limited selectivity and the need for further optimization. Therefore, this study provides a basis for developing more environmentally friendly processes for amalgamation tailings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kantarcı, S., Alp, İ., Azizi, Y. A., Sıvırcık, S. (2026). Mercury Removal from Glycine Leach Solutions Using Sodium Sulfide (Na2S) Precipitation. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, Volume: 13 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (68)

  1. Han C, Wang W, Xie F, Zhang T. Mechanism and kinetics of mercuric sulfide leaching with cuprous-thiosulfate solutions. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;177:223–32.
  2. United Nations Environment Programme, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program. Global Mercury Assessment 2018: Review Draft 2018. 2018;1–81. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25462/GMA 2018-ReviewDraft_250518_CLEAN_SEC. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  3. Keane S, Bernaudat L, Davis KJ, Stylo M, Mutemeri N, Singo P, et al. Mercury and artisanal and small-scale gold mining: Review of global use estimates and considerations for promoting mercury-free alternatives. Ambio. 2023;52(5):833–52.
  4. Simpson WW, Staker WL, Sandberg RG. Calcium Sulfide Precipitation of Mercury. Bur Mines Rep Investig. 1986;8.
  5. Nakano K, Shoki K, Yamasue E, Takaoka M. Recycling or chemical stabilization? Greenhouse gas emissions from treatment of waste containing mercury under the Minamata Convention. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag [Internet]. 2023;25(5):2668–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01714-8
  6. De Andrade Lima LRP, Bernardez L, Barbosa LAD. Characterization and treatment of artisanal gold mine tailings. J Hazard Mater. 2008;150:747–53.
  7. Kantarcı S, Alp İ, Youpoungam AA. Potassium Amyl Xanthate (PAX) as an alternative organic reactive for mercury removal from cyanidation process of amalgamation tailing. Environ Geochem Health. 2024;46(1)(28).
  8. UNEP. Guidance document on the management of artisanal and small-scale gold mining tailings. 2021;
  9. UNEP. WEBINAR - Best management practices in the use of cyanide in artisanal and small-scale gold mining. UN Environment Programme, Global Mercury Partnership. 2022.
  10. Alencar Meira da Silva H, Davée Guimarães JR. Mercury cyanide complexes and their relevance as environmental contaminants. Chemosphere. 2024;350(November 2023).
  11. Aylmore MG. Alternative lixiviants to cyanide for leaching gold ores. Dev Miner Process. 2005;15(C):501–39.
  12. Gökelma M, Birich A, Stopic S, Friedrich B. A review on alternative gold recovery reagents to cyanide. J Mater Sci Chem Eng. 2016;4(August):8–17.
  13. Gos S, Rubo A. The Relevance of Alternative Lixiviants with Regard to Technical Aspects, Work Safety and Environmental Safety. Cyplus Degussa AG, Hanau, Ger. 2001;
  14. Eksteen JJ, Oraby EA. The leaching and adsorption of gold using low concentration amino acids and hydrogen peroxide: Effect of catalytic ions, sulphide minerals and amino acid type. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2015;70:36–42. Available at: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.mineng.2014.08.020
  15. Altinkaya P, Wang Z, Korolev I, Hamuyuni J, Haapalainen M, Kolehmainen E, et al. Leaching and recovery of gold from ore in cyanide-free glycine media. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2020;158(August):106610. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mineng.2020.106610
  16. Barani K, Dehghani M, Azadi MR, Karrech A. Leaching of a polymetal gold ore and reducing cyanide consumption using cyanide-glycine solutions. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2021;163(January):106802. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106802
  17. Youpoungam AA. Investıgatıon Of Mercury Removal And Gold Recovery Methods From Amalgamıng Waste. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Tech Univ Grad Sch Nat Appl Sci Min Eng Grad Program,(in Turkish),Trabzon/Türkiye. 2023;144.
  18. Kantarcı S, Yoğurtcuoğlu E, Alp İ. Preliminary Test on Au-Ag leaching from Gossan Ore in aqueous alkaline glycine solutions. 16th Int Miner Process Symp (IMPS 2018). 2018;October 23.
  19. Oraby EA, Eksteen JJ, Tanda BC. Gold and copper leaching from gold-copper ores and concentrates using a synergistic lixiviant mixture of glycine and cyanide. Hydrometallurgy [Internet]. 2017;169:339–45. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. hydromet.2017.02.019
  20. Oraby EA, Eksteen JJ, Karrech A, Attar M. Gold extraction from paleochannel ores using an aerated alkaline glycine lixiviant for consideration in heap and in-situ leaching applications. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2019;138(April):112–8. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.04.023
  21. Oraby EA, Eksteen JJ, O’Connor GM. Gold leaching from oxide ores in alkaline glycine solutions in the presence of permanganate. Hydrometallurgy [Internet]. 2020;198(October):105527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105527
  22. Oraby EA, Eksteen JJ. The leaching of gold, silver and their alloys in alkaline glycine-peroxide solutions and their adsorption on carbon. Hydrometallurgy [Internet]. 2015;152:199–203. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.12.015
  23. Oraby EA, Eksteen JJ. Gold dissolution and copper suppression during leaching of copper-gold gravity concentrates in caustic soda-low free cyanide solutions. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2016;87:10–7. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. mineng.2015.08.006
  24. Tanda BC. Glycine as a lixiviant for the leaching of low grade copper-gold ores. 2017;(February). Available at: https://espace. curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/56525/Tanda Bennson 2017.pdf?sequence=1
  25. Eksteen JJ, Oraby EA, Tanda B. An alkaline glycine-based process for copper recovery and iron rejection from chalcopyrite. Proc 46th Annu Hydrometall Meet 4th Int Symp Iron Control Hydrometall [Internet]. 2016;349–58. Available at: http://www. mpsinnovation.com.au/wp-content/uploads/impcPaper351.pdf
  26. Li H, Deng Z, Oraby E, Eksteen J. Amino acids as lixiviants for metals extraction from natural and secondary resources with emphasis on glycine: A literature review. Hydrometallurgy [Internet]. 2023;216:106008. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304386X22001931
  27. Aksu S, Doyle FM. The Role of Glycine in the Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Copper. J Electrochem Soc [Internet]. 2002;149(6):G352. Available at: https://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1149/1.1474436
  28. Kantarci S, Youpoungam AA, Alp İ. International Patent Number: WO/2022/132061 A method and alternative reagents for the co-recovery and selective separation of mercury (hg) and gold (au) from au-hg metal alloys, which can exist in different auxhgy forms. 2022.
  29. Li, Q., Liu, T. and Deng, P. Recovery of Mercury and Lead from Wastewater by Sulfide Precipitation-Flotation. In Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials. 2015.
  30. Pohl A. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water and Wastewaters by Sulfur-Containing Precipitation Agents. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020;231(10).
  31. Kantarcı S, Alp İ. Removal of mercury from cyanide solutions. Karadeniz Chem Sci Technol [Internet]. 2019;(4). Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kcst/issue/51487/584591
  32. Sandberg RG, Simpson WW, Staker WL. Calcium Sulfide Precipitation of Mercury During Cyanide Leaching of Gold Ores. Rep Investig - United States, Bur Mines. 1984;
  33. Staker WL, Simpson WW, Sandberg RG. Mercury Removal from Gold Cyanide Leach Solution. Soc Min Eng AIME. 1983;
  34. Eksteen JJ, Oraby EA, Tanda BC. A conceptual process for copper extraction from chalcopyrite in alkaline glycinate solutions. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2017;108:53–66. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2017.02.001
  35. Deng Z, Oraby EA, Eksteen JJ. The sulfide precipitation behaviour of Cu and Au from their aqueous alkaline glycinate and cyanide complexes. Sep Purif Technol [Internet]. 2019;218(February):181–90. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.02.056
  36. Oghabi H, Haghshenas DF, Firoozi S. Selective separation of Cd from spent Ni-Cd battery using glycine as an eco-friendly leachant and its recovery as CdS nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol [Internet]. 2020;242(December 2019):116832. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116832
  37. Khodaei H, Fatmehsari Haghshenas D, Firoozi S. Selective leaching of zinc from carbonate source using glycine as an ecofriendly lixiviant. Miner Eng [Internet]. 2022;185:107680. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0892687522002904
  38. Li H, Oraby E, Eksteen J. Recovery of copper and the deportment of other base metals from alkaline glycine leachates derived from waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs). Hydrometallurgy [Internet]. 2021;199(October 2020):105540. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105540
  39. Mohamed AHA, Youpoungam AA, Boyraz T, Alp İ, Sinon A. Characterization and evaluation of glycine and cyanide leaching application on artisanal gold mining tailings. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2025;61(3).
  40. Youpoungam AA, Kantarcı S, Alp İ. Characterization and Reprocessing of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mine Tailings. Mining, Metall Explor. 2024;41(5):2603–18.
  41. Kantarcı S, Alp İ. Removal of mercury from cyanide leach solution using potassium amyl xanthate ( PAX ). Sep Purif Technol. 2023;309(December 2022).
  42. Jin-ming H. Selective Removal of Mercury in the Leachate Solution from Gold Ore Containing Mercury by Precipitation-Flocculation Method. Environ Sci Chem Technol Water Treat. 2007.
  43. Tassel F, Rubio J, Misra M, Jena BC. Removal of Mercury From Gold Cyanide Solution By Dissolved Air Flotation. Miner Eng. 1997;10(8):803–11.
  44. Joon Won L. The fundamental dissolution kinetics of silver sulfide and mercury sulfide in atmospheric cyanide solutions. Master Appl Sci - MASc, Dep Mater Eng Appl Sci Fac of; Mater Eng, Univ Br Columbia. 2013;
  45. Wang X, Forssberg KSE. The Chemistry of Cyanide-Metal Complexes in Relation to Hydrometallurgical Processes of Precious Metals. Miner Process Extr Met Rev. 1990;6:81–125.
  46. Gabby KL. Selective Mercury Sequestration from a Silver/Mercury Cyanide Solution. PhD Thesis, Michigan Technol Univ Chem Div. 2013;170.
  47. Gabby KL, Eisele TC, Bucknam CH, Hall B, Milosavljevic E. Simultaneous mercury capture and silver leaching using Ag2S-bearing ores and residues. Miner Metall Process. 2014;31(4):181–5.
  48. Solujic L, VanDyke MR, Milosavljevic E, Hendrix J. Stabilization (Precipitation) of Mercury From Precious Metals Extraction Waste Utilizing Trimercapto-s-Triazine. Second InternationalSymposium Extr Process Treat Minimization Wastes, Solujic, L, VanDyke, M R, Milosavljevic, E, Hendrix, J Stabilization Mercur From Precious Met Extr Waste. 1996;215–24.
  49. Misra M, Lorengo J, Nanor JB, Bucknam CB. Removal of mercury cyanide species from solutions using dimethyl dithiocarbamates. Miner Metall Process. 1998;15(4):60–4.
  50. Prokkola H, Nurmesniemi E, Lassi U. Removal of metals by sulphide precipitation using Na2S and HS- solution. ChemEngineering. 2020;4(51).
  51. Chen L, Lin K-F, Yang C-L. Pilot study of absorption of NO2 with Na2S aqueous solutions. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2011;30(4):632–9.
  52. Reátegui-Romero W, Castillejo-Melgarejo F, King-Santos ME. Industrial Manufacturing of Aqueous Solutions of Sodium Sulfhydrate (NaHS 43%) in a Multi-Phase Reactor. Open Chem Eng J. 2019;13(1):46–67.
  53. Norman JC, Sell NJ, Ciriacks JA. pH and conductivity of concentrated aqueous sodium sulfide/sodium carbonate solutions undergoing carbonation. Can J Chem Eng. 1990;68(2):346–8.
  54. Wang J, Wang R, Pan Y, Liu F, Xu Z. Thermodynamic analysis of gold leaching by copper-glycine-thiosulfate solutions using Eh-pH and species distribution diagrams. Miner Eng. 2022;179(107438).
  55. Kantarcı S. Removal of mercury from cyanide leach solution using potassium amyl xanthate ( PAX ). 2023;309(December 2022).
  56. Paquette KE, Helz GR. Inorganic Speciation of Mercury in Sulfidic Waters: The Importance of Zero-Valent Sulfur. Environ Sci Technol [Internet]. 1997;31(7):2148–53. Available at: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es961001n
  57. Matlock MM, Howerton BS, Van Aelstyn MA, Nordstrom FL, Atwood DA. Advanced mercury removal from gold leachate solutions prior to gold and silver extraction: A field study from an active gold mine in Peru. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36(7):1636–9.
  58. Staker WL, Simpson WW, Sandberg RG. Mercury Removal From Gold Cyanide Leach Solution. Miner Metall Process. 1984;56–61.
  59. Lewis AE. Review of metal sulphide precipitation. Hydrometallurgy [Internet]. 2010;104(2):222–34. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.06.010
  60. Van Hille RP, A. Peterson K, Lewis AE. Copper sulphide precipitation in a fluidised bed reactor. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(10):2571–8.
  61. Hledik C, Zeng Y, Plattner T, Fuerhacker M. Mercury Concentrations in Dust from Dry Gas Cleaning of Sinter Plant and Technical Removal Options. Water (Switzerland). 2024;16(14):1–13.
  62. Sandberg RG, Simpson WW, Staker W l. Calcium Sulfide Precipitation of Mercury During Cyanide Leaching of Gold Ores. Bur Mines Rep Investig. 1984;13.
  63. Renders P, Seward T. The stability of hydrosulfido- and sulfido-complexes of Au(I) and Ag(I) at 25 degree C. Chemistry (Easton) [Internet]. 1989; Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-stability-of-hydrosulfido-and-sulfido-complexes-Renders-Seward/0c563e9b496307c99c420fb1f9cfb642d21f5 62c
  64. Bulatovic SM. Handbook of Flotation Reagents: Chemistry, Theory and Practice, Vol. 1, Elsevier Sci. Technol. Books. 2007. 127–149 s.
  65. Miller JD, Alfarol E, Misra M, Lorengo J. Mercury Control in the cyanidation of Gold Ores. Proc Eng Found Tech Solut Pollut Prev Min Miner Process Ind. 1995;151–64.
  66. Drott A, Björn E, Bouchet S, Skyllberg U. Refining thermodynamic constants for mercury(II)-sulfides in equilibrium with metacinnabar at sub-micromolar aqueous sulfide concentrations. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(9):4197–203.
  67. Joon Won L. The fundamental dissolution kinetics of silver sulfide and mercury sulfide in atmospheric cyanide solutions. Master Appl Sci - MASc, Dep Mater Eng Appl Sci Fac of; Mater Eng, Univ Br Columbia. 2013;
  68. Solujic L, VanDyke MR, Milosavljevic E, Hendrix J. Stabilization (Precipitation) of Mercury From Precious Metals Extraction Waste Utilizing Trimercapto-s-Triazine. Second InternationalSymposium Extr Process Treat Minimization Wastes, Solujic, L, VanDyke, M R, Milosavljevic, E, Hendrix, J Stabilization Mercur From Precious Met Extr Waste. 1996;215–24.