Journals / Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

An Experimental Study on Determination of Crack Propagation Energy of Rock Materials under Dynamic (Impact) and Static Loading Conditions

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the context of improvementof the Charpy impact test for rock materials, some issues were pointed out in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Charpy impact test, a widely applied impact strength determination test for variousmaterials such as metals, polymers and cementitious materials was performed to evaluatethe crack propagation energy of 13 different granite type rock materials under the impactload condition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The energy levels measured from static load tests were significantly lower thanthose obtained from the dynamic load test that the ratio of energy level under the dynamicloading to energy level under static loading condition was measured to change between 39and 200 for different 13 type of granite materials tested in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the context of improvementof the Charpy impact test for rock materials, some issues were pointed out in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Charpy impact test, a widely applied impact strength determination test for variousmaterials such as metals, polymers and cementitious materials was performed to evaluatethe crack propagation energy of 13 different granite type rock materials under the impactload condition. Additionally, crack propagation energies of the granite materials were determinedunder the static load condition to compare the results with those of the Charpyimpact test. The energy levels measured from static load tests were significantly lower thanthose obtained from the dynamic load test that the ratio of energy level under the dynamicloading to energy level under static loading condition was measured to change between 39and 200 for different 13 type of granite materials tested in this study. The crack propagationtime for the chevron-notched specimens under static loading was also measured using professionalsound recording systems. As results of this study have not indicated that the crackpropagation speed and energy values measured from different granite materials have a directrelationship, energy-dependent crack propagation speed was found to be an inherent propertyof rock materials. The Charpy impact test was assessed usable for being a sensitive crackpropagation energy determination method for rock materials. In the context of improvementof the Charpy impact test for rock materials, some issues were pointed out in this study.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖMÜRLÜ, E. (2022). An Experimental Study on Determination of Crack Propagation Energy of Rock Materials under Dynamic (Impact) and Static Loading Conditions. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/537973

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ISRM. The Orange Book-The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014 (ed. by Ulusay R). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2014
  2. ISRM. The Blue Book-The complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterisation, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006 (ed. by Ulusay R, Hudson JA). Turkish National Group of ISRM, Ankara, 2007
  3. ISRM. Suggested method for determining mode I fracture toughness using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disk (CCNBD) specimens. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 32 (1995) 57–64
  4. ISRM. Suggested methods for determining the fracture toughness of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechics Abstracts 25 (1988) 71–96
  5. Backers T. Fracture Toughness Determination and Micromechanics of Rock Under Mode I and Mode II Loading, PhD Thesis. University of Potsdam, Germany, 2004
  6. Funatsu T, Shimizu N, Kuruppu M, Matsu K. Evaluation of mode I fracture toughness assisted by the numerical determination of K-resistance. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 48 (2014) 143–157
  7. Tutluoglu L, Keles C. Mode I fracture toughness determination with straight notched disk bending method. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 48 (2011) 1248-1261
  8. Zhou YX, Xia K, Li XB, Li HB, Ma GW, Zhao J, Zhou ZL, Dai F. Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 49 (2012) 105-112
  9. Whittaker BN, Singh RN, Sun G. Rock Fracture Mechanics: Principles, Design and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992
  10. Shetty DK, Rosenfield AR, Duckworth WH. Fracture toughness of ceramics measured a chevron-notched diametral-compression test. Journal of American Ceramic Society 68 (1985) C325-C327
  11. Altindag R. The evaluation of rock brittleness concept on rotary blast hole drills. Journal of South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 102 (2002) 61–66
  12. Altindag R. Correlation of specific energy with rock brittleness concepts on rock cutting. Journal of South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 103 (2003) 163–71
  13. Tiryaki B. Evaluation of the indirect measures of rock brittleness and fracture toughness in rock cutting. Journal of South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 106 (2006) 407-423
  14. Kaiser PK, Cai M. Design of rock support system under rockburst condition. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng