Journals / Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of The Posture Positions of The Apparel Workshop Employees with The Rapid Entire Body Assessment(REBA) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment(RULA) Method

Pages
149–160
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among the primary precautions needed to be taken to prevent the risks can be having the employee work at different tasks within certain intervals, monitoring the health, providing occupational health and safety educational programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As the industry made progress, human labor force gained importance as an element of work life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the analysis obtained, REBA score for the fabric cutting employee is 6, RULA score for the sewing machine operator is 4, REBA score for the quality control employee is 4, REBA score for the stain removal employee is 3, REBA score for the ironing employee is 6 and REBA score for the packaging employee is 5.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among the primary precautions needed to be taken to prevent the risks can be having the employee work at different tasks within certain intervals, monitoring the health, providing occupational health and safety educational programs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As the industry made progress, human labor force gained importance as an element of work life. The science of ergonomics came into being in order to take necessary precautions by determining the convenience of human motions with anatomy and risks and possible dangers during work. Through the methods of risk assessment, risks and possible dangers are determined to create a healthy environment for workers. Through REBA and RULA risk assessment methods, worker motions and postures are studied to determine convenience by calculating risk scores related to worker motions. The aim of REBA and RULA risk assessment methods is to study whether or not the worker is functioning in accordance with his/her skills and to prevent labor accidents and occupational diseases with the help of the data obtained.In this study, REBA and RULA risk scores are tried to be calculated by studying the motions of apparel workshop employees working in the fabric cutting, quality, packaging, ironing and stain removal sections. According to the analysis obtained, REBA score for the fabric cutting employee is 6, RULA score for the sewing machine operator is 4, REBA score for the quality control employee is 4, REBA score for the stain removal employee is 3, REBA score for the ironing employee is 6 and REBA score for the packaging employee is 5. According to the scores obtained through the use of REBA and RULA risk assessment method, the motions and postures of employees are determined to be at dangerous levels. Among the primary precautions needed to be taken to prevent the risks can be having the employee work at different tasks within certain intervals, monitoring the health, providing occupational health and safety educational programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çakır, A. D., Yavuz, Ş., Gür, B., KOSE, D. A. (2022). Investigation of The Posture Positions of The Apparel Workshop Employees with The Rapid Entire Body Assessment(REBA) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment(RULA) Method. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 149–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/537886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bayraktaroğlu, S. İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Genişletilmiş 6. Baskı, Adapazarı: Sakarya Kitabevi. 2015
  2. World Health Organization. Occupational Health a Manual for Primary Health Care Workers. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean Cairo;. p.14-20. 2001
  3. Aktay N. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Eğitimi ile İş Güvenliği Kültürü Arasındaki İlişki, İş Müfettiş Yardımcılığı Etüdü, İstanbul. 2012
  4. Akay D., Dağdeviren M., ve Kurt M., Çalışma Duruşlarının Ergonomik Analizi, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3): 73-84. 2003
  5. Erdemir F., Eldem C., Bir döküm atölyesindeki çalışma duruşlarının dijital insan modelleme tabanlı REBA yöntemi ile ergonomik analizi, Politeknik Dergisi, 23(2): 435-443. 2020
  6. Kahraman, M. F. Ergonomik Risk Değerlendirme Yöntemlerinin Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Teknikleri İle Önceliklendirilmesi ve Bütünleşik Bir Model Önerisi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 2012
  7. Sabancı A., Sümer S., Ergonomi. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Yayın No:80 3. Basım ISBN:978-605-5426-79-8 Ankara. 2015
  8. Zander, J., Principles of Ergonomics, Agricultural University Wageningen. 1973
  9. Aytaç, S. ve Kaya, Ö. Ergonominin Çalışma Yaşamındaki Önemi. İş Yazıları Dergisi, Sayı: 14, S. 1-14. 2019
  10. Sağıroğlu, H., Coşkun, M. ve Erginel, N. REBA İle Bir Üretim Hattındaki İş İstasyonlarının Ergonomik Risk Analizi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, Sayı:3 (3), S. 339-345. 2015
  11. Demir, M. Konaklama İşletmelerinde Ergonominin İşgören Verimliliği Üzerine Etkileri. İş, Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, Sayı: 5 (2), S. 10-18. 2003
  12. Neşeli, C. Ergonomik Risk Analizi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması ve Bir Kalıp İmalat Firmasında Uygulaması. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi. 2016
  13. Çakır, O., İnşaat İşlerinde Ergonomik Risklerin Reba, Rula ve Niosh Risk Değerlendirme Yöntemleri İle İncelenmesi, Üsküdar Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 2019
  14. Gürler Turan, Ö. Ofis Çalışmalarında Ergonomik Risklerin İş Sağlığı Ve Güvenliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 2016
  15. Chiasson, M. È., Imbeau, D., Aubry, K., Delisle, A. Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomic