SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene sphere implantation

Sklera biseksiyonu ve poröz polietilen sfer implantasyonuyla eviserasyon

C. Banu COŞAR
Suphi ACAR
Pages
146–148
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene implantation is a safe and easy procedure that allows the insertion of large implants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Evisceration With Scleral Bisection and Porous Polyethylene Sphere Implantation Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene implantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The charts of 11 patients who had evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene sphere (Medpor, Porex Surgical Inc., Atlanta, USA) implantation at Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital Eye Clinic 2, from December 2002 to April 2004 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene implantation is a safe and easy procedure that allows the insertion of large implants.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Evisceration With Scleral Bisection and Porous Polyethylene Sphere Implantation Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene implantation. Materials and Methods: The charts of 11 patients who had evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene sphere (Medpor, Porex Surgical Inc., Atlanta, USA) implantation at Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital Eye Clinic 2, from December 2002 to April 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. The age and sex of the patient, preoperative diagnosis, porous polyethylene implant sizes, and complications were reviewed. Results: An 18 mm implant was used in 7 eyes (63.6%) and a 20-mm implant was used in 4 (36.4%) eyes. Postoperatively, one patient had chemosis that resolved in 15 days. There was no other complication including conjunctival erosion, implant exposure, implant migration, enophthalmos, infection or evidence of sympathetic ophthalmia during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene implantation is a safe and easy procedure that allows the insertion of large implants.

Özet

Amaç: Sklera biseksiyonu ve poröz polietilen sfer implantasyonuyla eviserasyon cerrahisinin sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Aralık 2002-Nisan 2004 tarihleri arasında Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Kliniği'nde skleral biseksiyon tekniği ve poröz polietilen sfer (Medpor, Porex Surgical Inc., Atlanta, ABD) impantasyonuyla eviserasyon cerrahisi uygulanan 11 hastanın dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların yaşı ve cinsiyeti, operasyon öncesi tanı, poröz polietilen implant büyüklüğü ve komplikasyonlar değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yedi gözde (%63.6) 18 mm implant ve 4 gözde (%36.4) 20 mm implant kullanıldı. Postoperatuar dönemde 1 hastada 15 günde çekilen kemozis görüldü. Takip süresince, sütür açılması, konjunktiva erozyonu, implant açıkta kalması, implant göçü, enoftalmus, infeksiyon veya sempatik oftalmi bulgusu izlenmedi. Tartışma: Skleral biseksiyon ve poröz polietilen implantasyonu; büyük implantların kullanımına imkân veren güvenli ve basit bir işlemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞAR, C. B., ACAR, S. (2022). Evisceration with scleral bisection and porous polyethylene sphere implantation. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 146–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/535611

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Levine MR, Fagien S. Enucleation and evisceration. In: Ste wart WB, ed. Surgery of the eyelid, orbit and lacrimal system. Vol 3, San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1995, pp 84-111
  2. Zolli CL. Implant extrusion in eviscerations. Ann Ophthalmol 1988;20:127-35
  3. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Volumetric determination of enucleation implant size. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:489-94
  4. Massry GC, Holds JB. Evisceration with scleral modification. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;17:42-7
  5. Stephenson CM. Evisceration of the eye with expansion sclerotomies. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;3:249-51
  6. Kostick DA, Linberg JV. Evisceration with hydroxyapatite implant: surgical technique and review of 31 case reports. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1542-9
  7. Jordan DR, Parisi J.The scleral filet technique for secondary or bital implantation surgery. Can J Ophthalmol 1996;31:356-61
  8. Jordan DR, Anderson RL The universal implant for evisceration surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;13:1-7
  9. Jordan DR, Khouri LM. Evisceration with posterior sclerotomies. Can J Ophthalmol 2001;36:404-7
  10. Yang JG, Khwarg SI, Wee WR, Kim DM, Lee JH. Hydroxya patite implantation with scleral quadrisection after evisceration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997;28:915-9
  11. Banaz A, Arslan MO. Eviserasyon ve posterior sklerotomi He Medpor implantasyonu erken sonuçlarımız. TOD 36. Ulusal Oftalmoloji Kongresi, Ankara 2002; s70
  12. Rubin LR. Polyethylene as a bone and cartilage substitute: a 32-year retrospective. In: Rubin LR, ed. Biomaterials in Plastic Surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1983:477-93
  13. Karesh JW, Dresner SC. High density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant. Ophthalmology 1996;101:1688-96
  14. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Dorey M, Yuen VH, Gilberg S. Fibro vascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbita implant in a rabbit modal. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20(2): 136-43
  15. Van Acker E, De Potter P. Porous polyethylene (Medpor) or bital implant. Prospective study of 75 primary implantations. J Fr Ophthalmol 2001;24(10):1067-73
  16. Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, White WL, Shore JW. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;19(5):364-71
  17. Bigham WJ, Stanley P, Cahili JM et al. Fibrovascular ingrowth in porous ocular implants: the effect of material composition, porosity, growth factors, and coatings. Ophthal Plast Re c