Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1

The Outcomes of 'Surgeon-Tailored' Mesh with Midurethral Polypropylene Sling Operation

"KENDİ KESİM" MEŞ KULLANARAK MİDÜRETRAL POLİPROPİLEN SLİNG OPERASYON SONUÇLARIMIZ

Pages
28–33
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Surgeon-tailored mesh with MPS operation by establishing appropriate patient selection could be an alternative option for stress type incontinence surgery because of its cost-effectivity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives/Aims: Nowadays midurethral sling operation (MUS) has become the standard therapeutic option in stress type incontinence surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, we try to evaluate the clinical success, the complications and one year follow-up results in MPS operation.Materials and Methods :MPS operation was performed in 101 patients who have stress type incontinence, younger than 60 years, body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m², have not any pelvic operation history and uterine prolapse.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Surgeon-tailored mesh with MPS operation by establishing appropriate patient selection could be an alternative option for stress type incontinence surgery because of its cost-effectivity
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives/Aims: Nowadays midurethral sling operation (MUS) has become the standard therapeutic option in stress type incontinence surgery. Midurethral Polypropylene Sling (MPS) operation is one of the retropubic MUS operation by using 'Surgeon-Tailored' mesh. In our study, we try to evaluate the clinical success, the complications and one year follow-up results in MPS operation.Materials and Methods :MPS operation was performed in 101 patients who have stress type incontinence, younger than 60 years, body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m², have not any pelvic operation history and uterine prolapse. Polypropylene, monofilament and macropore characteristic of stanof them have resolved after the operation. Urethral catheter has pulled out 1 week after the operation in 8 (7,9 %) patient because of urinary retantion. Bladder perforation has detected in 1 (1,0 %) patient and her urethral catheter has pulled out 3 weeks after the operation. Chronic urinary retantion has occured in 4 (3,9 %) patients and they were underwent mesh excision. Only 1 (1,0 %) patient has been observed for each following complications; vaginal mesh extrusion, retropubic hematoma and wound enfection. There is no urethral and bladder erosion for MPS operation. The clinical success rate of mean one year follow-up is 89 %. Conclusion: Surgeon-tailored mesh with MPS operation by establishing appropriate patient selection could be an alternative option for stress type incontinence surgery because of its cost-effectivity

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Günümüzde midüretral sling (MUS) operasyonları stres tipte idrar kaçırma tedavisinde kullanılan standart tedavi seçeneği olarak kabul görmektedir. Midüretral Polipropilen Sling (MPS) operasyonu kendi kesim meş kullanarak yapılan retropubik bir MUS operasyonudur. Çalışmamızda MPS operasyonu ile tedavi edilen hastaların klinik başarı, komplikasyon ve ortalama bir yıllık takip sonuçlarını sunmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 60 yaşından genç, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) 30 kg/m² 'den küçük, geçirilmiş pelvik cerrahi hikayesi ve eşzamanlı uterus prolapsusu olmayan stres tipte idrar kaçıran 101 hasta dahil edildi. Operasyonda kullanılan meş polipropilen, monofilament ve makropor yapısında olup standart özelliklere sahiptir. Kendi kesim tekniği ile hazırlanan meşler 7,5 x 1 cm ölçüsünde kesildi ve her iki ucuna no.1 polipropilen sütür tespit edildi. MPS operasyonu uygulanan hastaların ortalama 1 yıllık takipleri, klinik başarı oranları, komplikasyonları ve yaşam kalitesi değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 101 hastanın, ortalama yaşı 46,5 (min:28 - maks:60) ve ortalama VKİ 27,5 kg/m² (min: 18,5 - maks: 29,9) 'dir. Hastaların 22 (% 21,6) tanesinde sıkışma bulguları mevcut olup 12 (% 54,5) 'sinin sıkışma bulguları operasyon sonrası dönemde gerilemiştir. Üriner retansiyonu olan 8 (% 7,9) hastanın üretral katateri operasyon sonrası 1. haftada, mesane yaralanması olan 1 (% 1,0) hastada ise operasyon sonrası 3. haftada üretral katateri çekilmiştir. Kronik üriner retansiyonu olan toplam 4 (% 3,9) hastada ise meş eksizyonu yapılmıştır. Sadece 1' er (% 1,0) hastada vajinal meş ekstruzyonu, retropubik hematom ve yara yeri enfeksiyonu izlenmiştir. MPS operasyonu olan hiçbir hastada üretral veya mesane erozyonu izlenmemiştir. Hastaların ortalama 12. ay takiplerindeki klinik başarı oranı % 89 olarak saptanmıştır. Tartışma ve Sonuç :Kendi kesim meş kullanılarak uygulanan MPS operasyonu düşük maliyetli olması nedeniyle uygun hasta seçimi sağlanarak stres tipi idrar kaçırma cerrahi tedavisinde alternatif bir seçenek olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, K., AKGÜL, H. M., KARACA, E. (2022). The Outcomes of 'Surgeon-Tailored' Mesh with Midurethral Polypropylene Sling Operation. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1, 28–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/535283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JLHR, et al. Guide- lines on Urinary Incontinence. European Association of Urology 2014; 73-86.
  2. Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Yucel O, et al. A new, simple, safe, effective and cost effective procedure for genuine stress incontinence: midurethral polypropylene sling. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43: 58-60.
  3. Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Alhan A. The midurethral poly- propylene sling for stress incontinence: 22-month re- sults of 81 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 272: 145-150.
  4. Karl ML. The Definition, Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Rev Urol 2004; 6: 3-9.
  5. Patel BN, Smith JJ, Badlani GH. Minimizing the cost of surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence and prolapse. Urology 2009; 74: 762-764.
  6. Subak LL, Goode PS, Brubaker L, et al. Urinary in- continence management costs are reduced fol- lowing Burch or sling surgery for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 171-177.
  7. Ulmsten U, Petros P. Intravaginal slingplasty(IVS). An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995; 29: 75-82
  8. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive sy- nthetic suburethral sling operations for urinary incon- tinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD006375. Van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Can preo- perative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority ran- domized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2012; 31: 1118-23.
  9. Ridgeway B, Barber MD. Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin North Am 2012; 39: 289-97.
  10. Roth CC, Holley TD, Winster JC, Synthetic slings: Whi- ch material, which approach. Curr Opin Urol 2006; 16(4): 234-239.
  11. Bukkapatnam R, Rodriguez LV. Synthetic sling options for stress urinary incontinence. Curr Urol Rep 2004; 5: 374-380.
  12. Seklehner S, Laudano MA, Xie D,et al. A Meta-analy- sis of the Performance of Retropubic Midurethral Slin- gs vs. Transobturator Midurethral Slings. J Urol 2014 Oct 1. pii: S0022-5347(14)04584-4. doi: 10.1016/j. juro.2014.09.104. [Epub ahead of print] Hammad FT, Kennedy-Smith A, Robinson RG. Erosions and urinary retention following polypropylene synthetic sling: Australasian survey. Eur Urol 2005; 47: 641-646.
  13. ÇİFTÇİ S, Özkürkçügil C. Vajinal Askı Cerrahisinde Meş- lere Bağlı Gelişen Komplikasyonlar. Kadın ve işlevsel Üroloji Bülteni. 2012; 2: 16 - 21 Tarcan T, Akbal C, Tinay İ, et al. D