SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 26

The Role of Translated Turkish Literature in Iran after The Islamic Revolution

İSLAM DEVRİMİ'NDEN SONRA TÜRK EDEBİYATINDANYAPILAN TERCÜMELERİN İRAN'DAKİ YERİ

Umut BAŞAR
Behruz BEKBABAYİ
Ehsan EMİRZADEH
Pages
367–384
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the results showed that the prevailing translation strategy after Islamic revolution has been in the process of naturalization and localization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Examining the post-revolutionary situation of translation in Iran reveals the social condition of Iran and the position of source literature in Persian literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results have indicated that the number of Turkish translated literature, especially after 1380s, has increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the results showed that the prevailing translation strategy after Islamic revolution has been in the process of naturalization and localization.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Examining the post-revolutionary situation of translation in Iran reveals the social condition of Iran and the position of source literature in Persian literature. Upon collecting the data related to the translated Turkish literature, the position of Turkish literature in Iran and the post-revolutionary social conditions were examined. The results have indicated that the number of Turkish translated literature, especially after 1380s, has increased. However, translators and professors of Turkish literature and language believe that the number of translated Turkish literature is very low. In addition, the results showed that the prevailing translation strategy after Islamic revolution has been in the process of naturalization and localization. In fact, translated Turkish literature was not innovatory; on the contrary, target literature was mostly conservative. As a result, stereotyped patterns and models were repeated. Translated Turkish literature has been audited for a long time after Islamic Revolution. In other words, the target literature has minimized the foreignness of the translated text and reduced the foreign cultural norms to target-language cultural norms in orderto protect and fortify them.

Özet

Bu araştırma, İran İslam Devriminden sonra Türkçeden yapılan tercümelerin durumunu ve bu tercümelerin İran toplumu ile Fars edebiyatındaki yerini göstermektedir. Bu araştırmada Türk Edebiyatından Farsçaya tercüme edilen eserlere ilişkin verilerin toplanmasıyla, Türk Edebiyatının İran İslam Devriminin gerçekleşmesinden sonraki dönemde İran'daki yeri araştırılmaktadır. Bulgulara göre tercüme edilen eserlerin sayısında özellikle 2000 yılından sonra artış görülmektedir. Bununla beraber bazı mütercim ve akademisyenlere göre Türkçeden tercüme edilen eserlerin sayısı oldukça azdır. İslam Devrimi sonrasında tercümede yerelleştirmenin genellikle tercih edilen bir yöntem olduğunu bulgular göstermektedir. Aslında tercüme faaliyetleri yenileşmenin hizmetinde olamayarak aksine muhafazakâr eğilim gösterip klişe şekiller ve olguları tekrar etmiştir. Başka bir deyişle edebiyat kendi değerleri ile normlarını korumak ve kendinden olmayan unsurları silmek üzere geleneksel öğeleri kuvvetlendirme yolunda adımlar atmıştır. Türkçe tercüme eserler ise bir müddet ilgi görmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞAR, U., BEKBABAYİ, B., EMİRZADEH, E. (2022). The Role of Translated Turkish Literature in Iran after The Islamic Revolution. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 26, 367–384. https://ajindex.com/articles/533578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Alvarez, R. and Vidal, M. (1996).
  2. Translation, Power, Subversion (1-9). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cronin, M. (1995). Altered States: Translation and Minority Languages.TTR: Traduction, Terminologi, Rédactionin (Vol. 8(no. 1), pp. 85-103).
  3. Even-Zohar, I. (1978/2000). The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary System. (L. Venuti, Ed.) in (pp. 192–197). Translation studies reader (1st ed.). London: Routledge. Even-Zohar, I. (1990b). Polysystem Theory. Poetics Today, 11(1), 9-13.
  4. Ferahzad, K. (1390). Tercüme der Devran-ı Defa-i Mukaddes. Fasılname-i Mütealat-ı Zeban ve Tercüme, Şomare: 1. Gürçağlar, Ş. (2008). The Politics and Poetics of Translation in Turkey, 1923-1960. Amsterdam: New York. Halliday, F. (1996). Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics in the Middle East. United Kingdom: I.B.Tauris. Hermans, T. (1996). Norms and the Determination of Translation. A Theoretical Framework. (R. Alvarez and M. C. Vidal, Eds.). Translation, Power, Subversionin (pp. 26-9). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Heyet, C. (1365). Seyri der Tarih-i Zeban ve Lehçeha-i Türk. Tahran: Peykan. Mehr Haber Ajansı. (1389). Türkler Farsçadan Tercümede Daha Aktifler / Türk Edebiyatına Karşı Dikkatsizlik. Munday, J. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies. London: Routledge. Niranjana, N. (1992). Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism, and the Colonial Context in (pp. 2-173).
  5. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press.
  6. Schaffner, C. (2010). Norms of Translation. (Y. Gambier and L. V. Doorslaer, Eds.). Handbook of Translation Studies in (Vol. 1, pp. 237-238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Spivak, G. (1993). Outside in the TeachingMachine in (pp. 182-190). New York: Routledge. Toury, G. (1991). Introducing Translation Theory: Selected Articles in (pp. 13-14). Tel Aviv University: Dyonun. Tymoczko, M. and Gentzler, E. (2002). Translation and Power in (pp. xi- xxviii). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  7. Tyulenev, S. (2014). Translation and Society: An Introductionin (p. 5). New York: Routledge. Venuti, L. (1995). The Translator’s Invisibility in (pp. 19-21). London; New York: Routledge. Venuti, L. (Ed.). (1992). Rethinking Translation; Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. London: Routledge. Wolf, M. (2007). Introduction: The Emergence of a Sociology of Translation. (M. Wolf and A. Fukari, Eds.). Constructing a Sociology of Translationin (p. 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Wolf, M. (2010). Sociology of Translation. (Y. Gam