Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Effect of Face-to-Face Education Provided Before the COVID-19 Pandemic and Online Education Provided During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Perceived Learning Outcomes: Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department

Covid 19 Pandemisi Öncesi Verilen Yüz Yüze Eğitimin ve Covid-19 Pandemisi Sırasında Verilen Çevrim İçi Eğitimin Algılanan Öğrenim Çıktıları Üzerine Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması: Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü

Pages
538–555
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While higher scores were observed in PLO in synchronous education of occupational therapy lesson online (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In the present study, it was aimed to compare the effects of six lessons, which were given synchronously in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation (PTR) and selected from among the lessons with high theoretical weight, on the perceived learning outcomes (PLO) of being given with face-to-face or synchronous online education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Students between the ages of 18-25 studying at Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University PTR, participated in the study (n=215, 120 female / 95 male).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While higher scores were observed in PLO in synchronous education of occupational therapy lesson online (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan öğrenim çıktısı · COVID 19 · çevrim içi eğitim

Abstract

Objective: In the present study, it was aimed to compare the effects of six lessons, which were given synchronously in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation (PTR) and selected from among the lessons with high theoretical weight, on the perceived learning outcomes (PLO) of being given with face-to-face or synchronous online education. Materials and Methods: Students between the ages of 18-25 studying at Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University PTR, participated in the study (n=215, 120 female / 95 male). In the last week of the course, the students filled out the POP Evaluation Form and the Online Education Satisfaction Questionnaire for the six courses with high theoretical weight. Results: For most of the PLO of the lessons, it was observed that similar results were obtained in both lesson systems (p>0.05). While higher scores were observed in PLO in synchronous education of occupational therapy lesson online (p

Özet

Amaç: Mevcut çalışmada Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon bölümünde (FTR) senkron olarak verilen ve teorik ağırlığı yüksek olan dersler arasından seçilen altı dersin yüz yüze eğitimle veya senkron çevrim içi eğitimle verilmesinin algılanan öğrenim çıktılarına (AÖÇ) olan etkisinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi FTR bölümünde okuyan 18-25 yaş arası öğrenciler (n=215, 120 kadın, 95 erkek) çalışmaya katılım sağlamıştır. Teorik ağırlığı yüksek olan altı dersin AÖÇ Değerlendirme Formu ve Çevrim içi Eğitimden Memnuniyet Anketi dersin son haftasında öğrencilere doldurtulmuştur. Bulgular: Derslerin AÖÇ’lerinin çoğunda her iki ders sisteminde de benzer sonuçlar alındığı görülmüştür (p>0,05). Üçüncü sınıf derslerinden iş ve uğraşı dersi çevrim içi senkron eğitimde, AÖÇ’de daha yüksek puanlar gözlenirken (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALACA, N., FEYZİOĞLU, Ö., KABA, H., SAFRAN, E. E. (2022). Comparison of the Effect of Face-to-Face Education Provided Before the COVID-19 Pandemic and Online Education Provided During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Perceived Learning Outcomes: Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 538–555. https://ajindex.com/articles/533417

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi.
  2. Duyurular. (2020). https://www.acibadem.edu.tr/duyurular
  3. Adams, A. E., Randall, S., & Traustadóttir, T. (2015). A tale of two sections: An experiment to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid versus a traditional lecture format in introductory microbiology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar6. Aragon, S., & Johnson, E. (2004). Factors influencing completion and non-completion of community college online courses. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 3498-3505). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292.
  4. Bacon, D. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education,38(1), 3–6.
  5. Bacon, D. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education,38(1), 3–6.
  6. Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115.
  7. Bates, A. W., & Bates, T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Psychology Press.
  8. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122.
  9. Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 323-346.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdle. De Luca, G., Van Kerckhove, K., Coletti, P., Poletto, C., Bossuyt, N., Hens, N., & Colizza, V. (2018). The impact of regular school closure on seasonal influenza epidemics: a data-driven spatial transmission model for Belgium. BMC İnfectious Diseases, 18(1), 1-16.
  11. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.
  12. Duque, L. C. (2014). A framework for analysing higher education performance: students' satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1-2), 1-21. González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Rodríguez, D. A