SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medeniyet Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?

Kronik İnme Hastalarında Üst Ekstremite Proprioseptif Eğitimin Fonksiyonel Sonuçlara Etkisi Var mıdır?

Nuray ALACA
Numan Melik OCAL
Mehmet Kerem CANBORA
Pages
91–98
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SSPS-22.0 program wasused for statistical evaluation and p 0.05).There was a statistically significant improvement in both PTR (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of upper extremity proprioceptive training on spasticity and functional motor skills in patients with chronic hemiplegia occurring after stroke.Method: Thirty chronic hemiplegic patients (17 females, mean age: 66.47±12.55 years) admitted tothe Research Center with a diagnosis of chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke were included inthe study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first group received a conventional physiotherapy program (PTR) for 5 days a week and the second group additionally received a proprioceptivetraining program (PTR-PT) for 5 days a week.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SSPS-22.0 program wasused for statistical evaluation and p 0.05).There was a statistically significant improvement in both PTR (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of upper extremity proprioceptive training on spasticity and functional motor skills in patients with chronic hemiplegia occurring after stroke.Method: Thirty chronic hemiplegic patients (17 females, mean age: 66.47±12.55 years) admitted tothe Research Center with a diagnosis of chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke were included inthe study. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group received a conventional physiotherapy program (PTR) for 5 days a week and the second group additionally received a proprioceptivetraining program (PTR-PT) for 5 days a week. Before and 6 weeks after the treatment modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor evaluation scale (FMA) and action-researcharm-test (ARAT) and motor activity log-28 scale (MAL-28) were applied. SSPS-22.0 program wasused for statistical evaluation and p 0.05).There was a statistically significant improvement in both PTR (p

Özet

Amaç: İnme sonrası, kronik hemipleji olan hastalarda üst ekstremite proprioseptif eğitimin spastisite, fonksiyonel motor beceriler ve günlük yaşam aktivitesi üzerine etkisini araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Araştırma Merkezine inme sonrası, kronik hemipleji tanısı ile başvuran 30 kronik hemiplejik birey (17 kadın, 66.47±12,55 yaş) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar iki guba ayrıldı. Birinci gruba haftada 5 gün konvansiyonel fizyoterapi programı (FTR), ikinci gruba ise bu programa ek olarak haftada 5 gün proprioseptif eğitim programı (PE) eklenmiştir. Hastaların tedavi öncesi ve 6 hafta sonrasında; modifiye ashworth ölçeği (MAÖ), Fugl-Meyer Üst Ekstremite Motor Değerlendirme Ölçeği (FÜM), Action-Research-Arm-Testi (ARAT), Motor Aktivite Günlüğü-28 Ölçeği (MAG-28) uygulandı. İstatiksel olarak SSPS-22,0 programı kulanıldı ve p0,05), FÜM, ARAT ve MAG-28 ölçeklerinde istatiksel olarak hem FTR (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALACA, N., OCAL, N. M., CANBORA, M. K. (2022). Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?. Medeniyet Medical Journal, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 91–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/579235

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Yavuzer G, Atay MB, Bussmann JB, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Bonita R. Epidemiology of Stroke. Lancet. 1992
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, Mcguire JR, Diaz S. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Urton ML, Kohia M, Davis J, Neill MR. Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occup Ther Int. 2007
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Dalyan AM, Cakcı A. İnme Rehabilitasyonu. In: Oguz H, Dursun E, Dursun N, editors. Tıbbi Rehabilitasyon. 2rd ed. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri
  6. p. 589-619. 6. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Otman S, Aksu S, Aras Ö, Karaduman A, Kerem M, Köse N, Meriç A, Livanelioğlu A, Hemipleji Rehabilitasyonunda Nörofizyolojik Yaklaşımlar. 1rd ed. Ankara: Hipokrat Kitapevi
  9. Hsieh YW, Chang WH, Chen CC, et al. Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot- assisted stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014
  10. 95(2):316-21. [CrossRef] 10. Rand D. Proprioception deficits in chronic stroke upper extremity function and daily living. PLoS ONE. 2018
  11. 13(3):e0195043. [CrossRef] 11. Kiper P, Agostini M, Baba A, Turolla A, Proprioceptive Based Training for stroke recovery. Proposal of new treatment modality for rehabilitation of upper limb in neurological diseases. Arch Phy Ther. 2015
  12. 5(1):6. [CrossRef] 12. Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller SM, Robinson M. Factors influencing stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1971
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Wade DT, Wood VA, Langton-Hewer R. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985
  14. 48(1):7-13. [CrossRef] 14. Smith DL, Akhtar AJ, Garraway WM. Proprioception and spatial neglect after stroke. Age Ageing. 1983
  15. 12(1):63-9. [CrossRef] 15. Gottlieb D, Kipnis M, Sister E, Medvedev V, Brill S, Vardi Y. Classification of stroke rehabilitation patients with a simple impairment scale. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1997
  16. 11(4):239-43. [CrossRef] 16. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: Measurem