SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Web-Based Turkish Dichotic Listening Test-Retest Reliability

Öykü Akkay(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0006-7861-7168
Emre Eskicioğlu(Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6842-2205
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The findings indicate that the DL test provides high reliability under non-forced conditions, but its reliability decreases under attentional conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study evaluated the test–retest reliability of a newly developed web-based dichotic listening test with Turkish syllables presented to individuals with normal hearing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By adapting the dichotic listening paradigm from its traditional laboratory implementation to a digital format, this study aimed to increase accessibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The findings indicate that the DL test provides high reliability under non-forced conditions, but its reliability decreases under attentional conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dichotic listening test · test-retest reliability · auditory processing

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the test–retest reliability of a newly developed web-based dichotic listening test with Turkish syllables presented to individuals with normal hearing. By adapting the dichotic listening paradigm from its traditional laboratory implementation to a digital format, this study aimed to increase accessibility. Materials and Methods: Forty-seven participants aged between 18 and 35 with normal hearing completed a web-based Turkish dichotic listening test. Participants were recruited online and completed the test using their own devices and headphones. A retest session was conducted two weeks after the first test. Results: The test exhibited high test-retest reliability across both ears in the non-forced condition (ICC_right = .79; ICC_left = .80), moderate reliability in the forced right condition (ICC = .70), and notably lower reliability in the forced left condition (ICC = .40). Conclusion: The findings indicate that the DL test provides high reliability under non-forced conditions, but its reliability decreases under attentional conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akkay, Ö., Eskicioğlu, E. (2026). Web-Based Turkish Dichotic Listening Test-Retest Reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1914938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Bayazıt, O., Öniz, A., Hahn, C., Güntürkün, O., & Özgören, M. (2009). Dichotic listening revisited: Trial-by-trial ERP analyses reveal intra-and interhemispheric differences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 536-545.
  2. Bedoin, N., Abadie, R., Krzonowski, J., Ferragne, E., & Marcastel, A. (2019). A combined forced-attention dichotic listening–Go/Nogo task to assess response inhibition and interference suppression: An auditory event-related potential investigation. Neuropsychology, 33(8), 1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000586
  3. Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., Arciuli, J., Kompus, K., Gudmundsen, M., & Hugdahl, K. (2013). “Right on all occasions?”–On the feasibility of laterality research using a smartphone dichotic listening application. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00042
  4. Blumstein, S., Goodglass, H., & Tartter, V. (1975). The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 2, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(75)80066-6
  5. Brancucci, A., Babiloni, C., Babiloni, F., Galderisi, S., Mucci, A., Tecchio, F.,. & Rossini, P. M. (2004). Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(8), 2329–2336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03302.x
  6. Broadbent, D. E. (2013). Perception and communication. Elsevier.
  7. Di Berardino, F., Gitto, M., Braga, L., Motta, N., Castelli, V., Filipponi, E.,. & Zanetti, D. (2025). Preliminary evaluation and reliability of the Italian adaptation of the dichotic digit test in adults and children. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 45(4), 269. http://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2974
  8. D'Anselmo, A., Marzoli, D., & Brancucci, A. (2016). The influence of memory and attention on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Hearing Research, 342, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.012
  9. Elyamany, O., Iffland, J., Lockhofen, D., Steinmann, S., Leicht, G., & Mulert, C. (2024). Top-down modulation of dichotic listening affects interhemispheric connectivity: An electroencephalography study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1424746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1424746
  10. Eskicioglu, E., Taslica, S., Guducu, C., Oniz, A., & Ozgoren, M. (2025). Effects of voice onset time and place of articulation on perception of dichotic Turkish syllables. Speech Communication, 167, 103170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2024.103170
  11. Eskicioğlu, E., Güdücü, Ç., & Özgören, M. (2024). A Behavioral Approach to the Effects of the Gender of Voice on the Dichotic Listening Test Performance. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 8(1), 137-142.
  12. Eskicioglu, E., Taslica, S., Narin, B., Guducu, C., Oniz, A., & Ozgoren, M. (2019). Brain asymmetry in directing attention during dichotic listening test: An fNIRS study. Laterality, 24(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2018.1527847
  13. Ferreira, G. C., & Costa, M. J. (2020). Variability of the dichotic sentence test in the test and retest of normal hearing adults. CoDAS, 32, e20190040. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202019040
  14. Gorecka, M. M., Vasylenko, O., & Rodríguez-Aranda, C. (2020). Dichotic listening while walking: A dual-task paradigm examining gait asymmetries in healthy older and younger adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(8), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1811207
  15. Hiscock, M., & Kinsbourne, M. (2011). Attention and the right-ear advantage: What is the connection? Brain and Cognition, 76(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.016
  16. Hugdahl, K. (1995). Dichotic listening: Probing temporal lobe functional integrity. Brain Asymmetry, 1, 123–156.
  17. Hugdahl, K., & Hammar, Å. (1997). Test-retest reliability for the consonant-vowel syllables dichotic listening paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(5), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403752
  18. Hugdahl, K., Westerhausen, R., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., Laine, M., & Hämäläinen, H. (2009). Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00676.x
  19. Husain, I. A., Millar, K. A., & Voyer, D. (2024). Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention. Laterality. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2024.2430964
  20. Jäncke, L., Liem, F., & Merillat, S. (2021). Are language skills related to structural features in Broca's and Wernicke's area? European Journal of Neuroscience, 53(4), 1124–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15038
  21. Javed, K., Reddy, V., Das, J. M., & Wroten, M. (2023). Neuroanatomy, Wernicke area. StatPearls Publishing.
  22. Jerger, J., & Martin, J. (2006).Dichotic listening tests in the assessment of auditory processing disorders. Hearing Balance and Communication, 4(1), 25–34. http://doi.org/10.1080/16513860600567823
  23. Kazimierczak, K., Craven, A. R., Ersland, L., Specht, K., Dumitru, M. L., Sandøy, L. B., & Hugdahl, K. (2022). Combined fMRI region-and network-analysis reveal new insights of top-down modulation of bottom-up processes in auditory laterality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 802319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.802319
  24. Kelley, K. S., & Littenberg, B. (2019). Dichotic listening test–retest reliability in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(1), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0158
  25. Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083219
  26. Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(67)80010-8
  27. Kinsbourne, M. (1973). The control of attention by interaction between the cerebral hemispheres.
  28. Koomar, J. A., & Cermak, S. A. (1981). Reliability of dichotic listening using two stimulus formats with normal and learning-disabled children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35(7), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.35.7.456
  29. Mahdavi, M. E., Pourbakht, A., Parand, A., & Jalaie, S. (2018). Test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change of randomized dichotic digits in learning-disabled children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 29(03), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16134
  30. McClannahan, K. S., Chiu, Y. F., Sommers, M. S., & Peelle, J. E. (2021). Test-retest reliability of audiometric assessment in individuals with mild dementia. JAMA Otolaryngology, 147(5), 442–449. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0012
  31. Moncrieff, D., Jorgensen, L., & Ortmann, A. (2013). Psychophysical auditory tests. In Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology (Vol. 10, pp. 217–234). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-5310-8.00011-9
  32. Moradiju, E., Mahdavi, M. E., Zarrinkoob, H., & Tabatabaee, S. M. (2017). Test-retest reliability of Persian auditory processing tests. Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 6(4), 160–167.
  33. Ono, Y., Zhang, X., Noah, J. A., Dravida, S., & Hirsch, J. (2022).Bidirectional connectivity between Broca's and Wernicke's area. Brain Connectivity, 12(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2020.0790
  34. Öner, N., & LeCompte, W. A. (1985). Durumluk-sürekli kaygı envanteri el kitabı. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  35. Palaniswamy, H. P., Bhat, M., Bhat, R. G., Krishna, Y., & Rajashekhar, B. (2023).Development and validation of non-speech dichotic listening test. Journal of Otology, 18(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2022.12.004
  36. Pollmann, S., Maertens, M., von Cramon, D. Y., Lepsien, J., & Hugdahl, K. (2002). Dichotic listening in patients with callosal lesions. Neuropsychology, 16(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.16.1.56
  37. Ramachandran, S., Kumaar, B., Karupaiah, K., Rajan, R., Kodilingam, A., Manoj, A., & Prabhu, P. (2023). Test-retest reliability of dichotic listening test. Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 39(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-023-00552-7
  38. Rogers, C. S., Payne, L., Maharjan, S., Wingfield, A., & Sekuler, R. (2018). Older adults show impaired modulation of attentional alpha oscillations. Psychology and Aging, 33(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000238
  39. Ross, B., Hillyard, S. A., & Picton, T. W. (2010). Temporal dynamics of selective attention during dichoti listening. Cerebral Cortex, 20(6), 1360–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp201
  40. Tabak, S. N., & Konukseven, O. (2024). Turkish dichotic sentence mobile scan test results in young and elderly people. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 40(1), 33.
  41. Tanaka, T. N., Carvalho, N. G. D., Colella-Santos, M. F., & Amaral, M. I. R. D. (2022). AudBility: Test-retest reliability in children. CoDAS, 34, e20210219. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021219en
  42. Uysal, S. A., Ekinci, Y., Çoban, F., & Yakut, Y. (2019). Edinburgh el tercihi anketi Türkçe güvenirliği. Journal of Exercise Therapy, 6(2), 112–118.
  43. Voyer, D., & Hearn, N. (2019). Auditory semantic priming and right ear advantage. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.013
  44. Westerhausen, R. (2019). A primer on dichotic listening. Laterality, 24(6), 740–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1598426
  45. Westerhausen, R., & Samuelsen, F. (2020). An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm. PLoS One, 15(6), e0234665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234665
  46. Westerhausen, R., Fabri, M., & Hausmann, M. (2023). Dichotic-listening performance after callosotomy. Neuropsychologia, 188, 108627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108627
  47. Brancucci, A., Babiloni, C., Babiloni, F., Galderisi, S., Mucci, A., Tecchio, F.,. & Rossini, P. M. (2004). Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(8), 2329–2336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03302.x
  48. Di Berardino, F., Gitto, M., Braga, L., Motta, N., Castelli, V., Filipponi, E.,. & Zanetti, D. (2025). Preliminary evaluation and reliability of the Italian adaptation of the dichotic digit test in adults and children. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 45(4), 269. http://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2974