Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 2004 - Sayı: 27

Öğrencilerin Sözcük Bilgisinin Strateji Eğitimi ve Sözcüklerin Tekrarlanması ile Geliştirilmesi

Improving Learners' Vocabulary Through Strategy Training and Recycling the Target Words

Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the treatment the experimental group received contributed to students’ vocabulary recall of the selected items positively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine whether an approach combining creating strategy awareness and recycling words will result in better vocabulary learning (delayed recall) of selected words than teaching vocabulary following the course book alone, for intermediate level English language learners.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two English language classes, a total of 51 students at Hacettepe University Preparatory School participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the treatment the experimental group received contributed to students’ vocabulary recall of the selected items positively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an approach combining creating strategy awareness and recycling words will result in better vocabulary learning (delayed recall) of selected words than teaching vocabulary following the course book alone, for intermediate level English language learners. Two English language classes, a total of 51 students at Hacettepe University Preparatory School participated in the study. The study followed a pre-test post-test control group design. The comparison of the means of the pre-test scores of both control and experimental groups showed that the two groups were not significantly different in terms of their vocabulary proficiency on the tested items. After the treatment however, the post-test scores of the two groups showed significant differences. The results indicated that the treatment the experimental group received contributed to students’ vocabulary recall of the selected items positively.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, strateji eğitimi ve sözcüklerin tekrar edilmesi yöntemleri kullanılarak sözcük öğrenen orta düzey ingilizce bilgisine sahip öğrencilerin bu yöntemi izlemeden sadece kitaptan sözcük öğrenen öğrencilerle karşılaştırıldığında sözcük öğrenmede daha başarılı olup olmayacakları araştırılmıştır. Çalışmaya Hacettepe Üniversitesi hazırlık okulunda 2 ayrı sınıfta ingilizce öğrenen toplam 51 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmanın deseni öntest-sontest kontrol grubu şeklinde kurulmuştur. Öntest sonuçlarının ortalamalarının karşılaştırılması sonucu kontrol ve deney gruplarının öntestte ölçülen sözcük bilgisi açısından farklılık göstermediği anlaşılmıştır. Uygulama sonrası verilen sontest puanlarının ortalamaları karşılaştırıldığında ise deney grubu lehine istatistiksel olarak farklılık bulunmuştur. Bu da deney grubuna verilen eğitimin hedef sözcüklerin öğrenilmesinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEFEROĞLU, G., AKIN, A. (2022). Öğrencilerin Sözcük Bilgisinin Strateji Eğitimi ve Sözcüklerin Tekrarlanması ile Geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2004 - Sayı: 27, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/532516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Baykal, G. & Daventry, A. (2000). Vocabulary for interacting with. In S. Tüzel-Köymen & E. Kortan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th METU international ELT convention: Interaction on the threshold of a new millennium, (pp. 168-173). Ankara: Middle East Technical University. Crothers, E. & P. Suppes. (1967). Experiments in second language learning. New York: Academic Press.
  2. Ellis, G. & Sinclair, B. (1986). A systematic programme of learning training: The learner to learn more effectively. In Holden, S. (Ed.), Techniques of teaching. MEP. Gairns, R. & Redman, S. (1998). Working with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Gu, Y. & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language outcomes. Language Learning, 46, 643-679.
  4. Harmer, J. (1994). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman. Kachroo, J. N. (1962). Report on an investigation into the teaching of vocabulary in the first year of English. Bulletin of the Central Institute of English, 2, 67-72.
  5. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago: Association Press.
  6. Meara, P. (1982). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. In V. Kinsella (Ed.) Surveys I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Moir, J. (1996). Task awareness and learning effectiveness: A case study of ten learners’ perceptions of a vocabulary learning task. Unpublished MA paper, LALS, Victoria University of Wellington. Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Nation, I. S. P. (2002). Best practice in vocabulary teaching and learning. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 267-272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 1, 133–158.
  10. Nunan, D. (2002). Learner strategy training in the classroom: An action research study. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 133-143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House. Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typolo