SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 31

"Physical Education and Sports for the Disabled" Course and Students' Attitudes

Engelliler İçin Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersinin Öğrencilerin Engellilere Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi

Ferda GÜRSEL
Pages
67–73
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analysis of covariance ANCOVA for mixed measures test revealed significant difference attitude towards individual with physical disabilities between groups the measurements at the beginning and end of the semester F(11,78)=14.22, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was designed to investigate the attitudes of prospective physical education teachers towards individuals with physical disabilities by adapted physical education course. 47 prospective physical education teachers (Study group) and 34 students (Sport management and coaching- control group) participated in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study group took 14 weeks Adapted Physical Education course and the control group did not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analysis of covariance ANCOVA for mixed measures test revealed significant difference attitude towards individual with physical disabilities between groups the measurements at the beginning and end of the semester F(11,78)=14.22, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the attitudes of prospective physical education teachers towards individuals with physical disabilities by adapted physical education course. 47 prospective physical education teachers (Study group) and 34 students (Sport management and coaching- control group) participated in the study. Study group took 14 weeks Adapted Physical Education course and the control group did not. Attitude Towards Disabled Person- “O Form” scale was used to determine the attitudes of the groups (Yuker, Block, &Young, 1970). Analysis of covariance ANCOVA for mixed measures test revealed significant difference attitude towards individual with physical disabilities between groups the measurements at the beginning and end of the semester F(11,78)=14.22, p

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Engelliler İçin Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersinin (EBES), Beden Eğitimi Spor Öğretmenliği Bölümü öğrencilerinin bedensel engelli kişilere yönelik genel tutumları üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmaya 47 Beden Eğitimi spor öğretmenliği (çalışma grubu), 34 diğer bölüm öğrencileri (spor yöneticiliği ve antrenörlük- kontrol grubu) katılmışlardır. Çalışma grubu 14 hafta boyunca Engelliler İçin Beden Eğitimi ve Spor dersi almış kontrol grubu ise bu dersi almamıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Yuker, Block ve Young, (1970) tarafından geliştirilen Yetersizlikten Etkilenmiş Kişilere Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği- “O Formu” (Attitude Toward Disabled Person) kullanılmıştır. Kovaryans Analizi ANCOVA testi sonuçlarına göre EBES dersi aldıktan sonra bedensel engelli bireylere yönelik genel tutumlar çalışma ve kontrol grupları arasında anlamlı fark göstermiştir F(1,79)=14.22, p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSEL, F. (2022). "Physical Education and Sports for the Disabled" Course and Students' Attitudes. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2006 - Sayı: 31, 67–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/532480

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bacon, e.h., & Schultz, J.B. (1991) a survey of mainstreaming practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 144-149.
  2. Bender, W. N., Vail, C. O., & Scott, K. (1995). Teacher’s attitude increased mainstreaming: Implementing effective instruction for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 87-94.
  3. Buell, M. J., Halam, R., Gamel-McCormick, M., & Scheer, S. (1999). A survey of general and special education teacher’s perceptions an in-service needs concerning inclusion. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 46(2), 143-156.
  4. Craig, C. S. (1991). Labels and the attitudes of undergraduate physical education students toward disabled individuals. Physical Educator, 48(3), 142-146.
  5. Folsom-Meek, S. L., Groteluschen, W., & Nearing, R.J.,& (1996) The influence of academic major and hands-on experience on college students’ attitudes toward learners with mild disabilities. Brazillian Journal of Adapted Physical Education Research, 31(1),47-66.
  6. Forlin, C., Fogarty, G., & Caroll, A. (1999). Validation of the factor structure of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51 (1), 50-55.
  7. Ford, A., Pugach, M. A., & Otis-Wilborn, A. (2001). Preparing general educators to work well with students who have disabilities: what’s reasonable at the preservice level? Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(4), 275-285.
  8. Gregory, D. (1997). Before and after the Americans with Disabilities Act: an analysis of attitude and knowledge of undergraduate music majors. Journal of Music Therapy, 24(2), 119-128.
  9. Hodge, S.R. (1998). Prospective Physical education Teacher’s Attitudes Toward Teaching Students with disabilities. Physical Educator, 55(2), 68-78.
  10. Hodge, S. R., & Jansma, P. (1997/1998, Winter). Attitude change of physical education majors toward teaching students with varied disabilitytypes.Clinical kinesiology, 51(4),72-79.
  11. Hasting, R., Hewes, A., Lock, S., & Witting, A. (1996). Do special needs courses have any impact on student teacher’s perceptions of children with severe learning difficulties? British Journal of Special Education, 23, 139-144.
  12. Mathews, P.R., Hameister, B.G., & Hosley, N. S. (1998). Attitudes of college student toward study abroad: Implications for disability, service providers.Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13(2), 67-77.
  13. Murpy, D. M. (1996). Implications of inclusion for general and special education. Elementary School Journal, 96, 469-493.
  14. Özyürek, M.