SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 2008 - Sayı: 35

Portfolyo Değerlendirmesi: Son Çalışmalardaki Bulgulara Yakından Bir Bakış

Reliability of Portfolio: A Closer Look at Findings from Recent Publications

Michael SCHALLIES
Özge OSKAY ÖZYALÇIN
Pages
263–272
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concept of portfolio, portfolio building steps, contents of portfolio, evaluation of portfolio, advantages, disadvantages and concerns in using portfolio as well as validity and reliability of portfolio assessment are discussed considering recent findings from research literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this review article, conventional portfolio assessment and new developments in portfolio assessment are investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this review article, conventional portfolio assessment and new developments in portfolio assessment are investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concept of portfolio, portfolio building steps, contents of portfolio, evaluation of portfolio, advantages, disadvantages and concerns in using portfolio as well as validity and reliability of portfolio assessment are discussed considering recent findings from research literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this review article, conventional portfolio assessment and new developments in portfolio assessment are investigated. The concept of portfolio, portfolio building steps, contents of portfolio, evaluation of portfolio, advantages, disadvantages and concerns in using portfolio as well as validity and reliability of portfolio assessment are discussed considering recent findings from research literature.

Özet

Bu derleme makalede, geleneksel portfolio değerlendirmesi ve portfolio değerlendirmesindeki yeni gelişmeler değerlendirilmiştir. Portfolyo kavramı, portfolio hazırlama basamakları, portfolyonun içindekiler, portfolyonun değerlendirilmesi, portfolio kullanımının avantaj ve dezavantajları, portfolio değerlendirmesinin güvenilirliği ve geçerliği literatürdeki en son bulgular ışığında değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SCHALLIES, M., ÖZYALÇIN, Ö. O. (2022). Portfolyo Değerlendirmesi: Son Çalışmalardaki Bulgulara Yakından Bir Bakış. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2008 - Sayı: 35, 263–272. https://ajindex.com/articles/532384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adamchik, C. (1996). The design and assessment of chemistry portfolios. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(6), 528-31. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National council on measurement in education. Standards for Educational and Psychological testing (1999).
  2. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
  3. Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L & Bear, S. (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 221-244.
  4. Brennan, R. (2001). An essay on the history and future of reliability from the perspectives of replications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 295-317.
  5. Collins, A. (1992). Portfolio for science education: Issues in purpose, structure and authency, Science Education, 76(4), 451-463.
  6. Danielson, C & Abrutyn, L. (1997). An introduction to using portfolios in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Derham, C., Diperna, J., (2007). Digital Professional Portfolios of Preservice Teaching: An Initial Study of Score Reliability and Validity. JI. of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 363-381.
  7. Driessen, E. W., Overeem, K., Tartwijk, J., Van der Vleuten, C & Muijtjens, A. M. M., (2006). Validity of portfolio assessment: Which qualities determine ratings? Medical Education, 40, 862–866.
  8. Eysel, C. (2006). Interdisziplinäres Lehren und Lernen in der Lehrerbildung. Eine empirische Studie zum Kompetenzerwerb in einer komplexen Lernumgebung. Berlin: Logos Verlag. Fenwick, T. (1996). Assessing adult learning using portfolios, Paper presented at the Atlantic Teaching Showcase Conference. Université St. Anne, Church Point, Nova Scotia, October 25, 1996,
  9. Canada. Gadbury-Amyot, C. (2003). Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program, A Dissertation in Education, Doctor of Education, University of Missouri-Kansas City. Gadbury-Amyot, C, C., Kim, J., Palm R. L., Mills, E., Noble, E & Overman, P. (2003). Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program, Journal of Dental Education, 67(9) 991- 1002. Gelinas, A. (1998). Issues of Reliability and Validity in Using Portfolio Assessment to Measure Foreign Language Teacher Performance, Diss