SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 40

The effects of reflection points in video-cases and teacher participation in online discussion groups on reflective thinking

Video-durumlarda yansıma noktalarının ve tartışma gruplarında öğretmen katılımının yansıtıcı düşünmeye etkisi

Hüseyin ÖZÇINAR
Deniz DERYAKULU
Pages
321–331
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, teacher participation in the online discussion groups did not affect the student teachers’ reflective thinking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to find out the effects of reflection points in the video-cases and teacher participation in the online discussion groups on student teachers’ reflective thinking skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was carried out in 2x2 factorial design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, teacher participation in the online discussion groups did not affect the student teachers’ reflective thinking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find out the effects of reflection points in the video-cases and teacher participation in the online discussion groups on student teachers’ reflective thinking skills. The research was carried out in 2x2 factorial design. The independent variables of the study were adding reflection points to the video-cases and teacher participation in the online discussion groups. The dependent variable was the student teachers’ reflective thinking. Participants were 74 student ICT teachers from two large universities’ departments of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education. Study results revealed that adding reflection points to the video-cases significantly increased the student teachers’ reflective thinking. However, teacher participation in the online discussion groups did not affect the student teachers’ reflective thinking.

Özet

Bu araştırma, video-durumlarm uzman yorumlarıyla zenginleştirilmesinin ve video-durumlarm tartışılması için oluşturulan çevrimiçi tartışma gruplarında öğretmen adayları ile öğretmenlerin birlikte bulunmalarının, öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme düzeylerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma, 2x2 faktöryel desende yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın bağımsız değişkenleri, video-durumlara yansıma noktaları eklenmesi ve tartışma gruplarında öğretmen katılımından oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın bağımlı değişkeni ise, yansıtıcı düşünme düzeyidir. Çalışma, 2008-2009 öğretim yılında güz döneminde Ankara Üniversitesi ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü III. sınıfında öğrenim gören toplam 74 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın ortaya koyduğu sonuçlara göre, video-durumlara yansıma noktaları eklenmesi, yansıtıcı düşünme düzeyini anlamlı olarak arttırmış, çevrimiçi tartışma gruplarındaki öğretmen katılımı ise, yansıtıcı düşünme düzeyi üzerinde anlamlı bir etki yaratmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇINAR, H., DERYAKULU, D. (2022). The effects of reflection points in video-cases and teacher participation in online discussion groups on reflective thinking. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 40, 321–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/532262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ball, D.L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond and G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professional: Handbook ofpolicy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., & Pedretti, E. ( 2001). Multi-media case methods in pre-service science education: Enabling an apprenticeship for praxis. Science Education, 31, 191-209.
  2. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1997). İki faktörlü varyans analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 141-58.
  3. Clark, C. M. (1986). Ten years of conceptual development in research on teacher thinking. In M. Ben-Peretz, R. Bromme, and R. Halkes (Eds.), Advances of research on teacher thinking (pp.7-21) Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger. Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2005). Engaging electronically: Using CMC to develop students' argumentation skills in higher education. Language and Education, 19(1), 32-49
  4. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Shattered images: Understanding expectations and realities of field experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(6), 457-471
  5. Costa, A.L., & Callick, B. (2000). Activating and engaging habits of mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Dolen, W.M., van, Dabholkar, P.A., & Ruyter, J. (2007). Satisfaction with online commercial group chat: The influence of perceived technology attributes, chat group characteristics, and advisor communication style. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 339-358.
  6. Galvez-Martin, M., Bowman, C. L., & Morrison, M. (1998). An exploratory study of the level of reflection attained by preservice teachers. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 9(2), 19-25
  7. Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Places where teachers are taught. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Gunawardena, C.N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147-166.
  8. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49
  9. John, M. St. & Stokes, L. (2003). Opening windows onto classrooms: Promises and challenges in the design of video cases for professional development in mathematics and science. Retrieved October 20, 2008 from http://www.inverness-research.org/report /ab_videocasesconf.htm. Jones, Q. (2000, March). Time to split, virtually: E