SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Servant Leadership and Voice Behavior in Higher Education

Yükseköğretimde Hizmetkâr Liderlik ve Dile Getirme Davranışı

Hakan ERKUTLU
Jamel CHAFRA
Pages
29–41
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results revealed a significant positive relationship between servant leadership and voice behavior and mediating roles of psychological empowerment and safety on that relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between servant leadership and voice behavior and the mediating roles of psychological empowerment and psychological safety on that relationship in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample encompasses a total of 793 faculty members along with their deans from randomly selected 10 state universities in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya, Bursa, Samsun and Gaziantep during 2012-2013 spring semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results revealed a significant positive relationship between servant leadership and voice behavior and mediating roles of psychological empowerment and safety on that relationship.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between servant leadership and voice behavior and the mediating roles of psychological empowerment and psychological safety on that relationship in higher education. The study sample encompasses a total of 793 faculty members along with their deans from randomly selected 10 state universities in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya, Bursa, Samsun and Gaziantep during 2012-2013 spring semester. Faculty member's perceptions of psychological empowerment, psychological safety and voice behavior were measured using the psychological empowerment scale developed by Spreitzer (1995), the psychological safety scale developed by Edmondson (1999) and van Dyne and LePine's (1998) voice behavior scale respectively. Ehrhart's (2004) servant leadership scale was used to assess faculty dean's perception of the servant leadership. The results revealed a significant positive relationship between servant leadership and voice behavior and mediating roles of psychological empowerment and safety on that relationship.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı yüksek eğitimde hizmetkâr liderlik ve dile getirme davranışı arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide psikolojik güçlendirme ve psikolojik güvenlik kavramlarının aracılık rollerini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini 2012-2013 ilkbahar döneminde İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya, Bursa, Samsun ve Gaziantep'te rastlantısal yöntemle seçilen 10 devlet üniversitesindeki 793 öğretim üyesi ve onların dekanları oluşturmaktadır. Öğretim üyelerinin psikolojik güçlendirme, psikolojik güvenlik ve dile getirme davranışları sırasıyla Spreitzer (1995) tarafından geliştirilen psikolojik güçlendirme ölçeği, Edmondson (1999) tarafından geliştirilen psikolojik güvenlik ölçeği ve van Dyne ve LePine'ın (1998) dile getirme davranışı ölçeği kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Fakülte dekanlarının hizmetkâr liderlik algılamalarını değerlendirmek için Ehrhart'ın (2004) hizmetkâr liderlik ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar hizmetkâr liderlik ile dile getirme davranışı arasında olumlu ve önemli bir ilişki ve bu ilişkide psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmin kavramlarında aracılık rolleri bulunduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUTLU, H., CHAFRA, J. (2022). Servant Leadership and Voice Behavior in Higher Education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 29–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/531843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Barbuto, J. E., Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group Organization Management, 31, 300--326. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator--mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173--1182. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational eflectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations ofa new discipline. San Francisco: Jossey--Bass. Chullen, C., Benjamin, D., Angermeier, B., Ingo, B., Wayne, B., Alan, D. (2010). Minimizing deviant behavior in healthcare organizations: the effects of supportive leadership and job design. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(6), 381--397. Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471--482. Detert, J., Burris, E. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869--884. Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004--1012. Dirks, K. T., Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: meta--analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal oprplied Psychology, 87, 611--628. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350--383. Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: group--level lens. In R. M. Kramer K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (pp. 239--272). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit--level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psycholog 57, 61--94. Eisenberg, E., Goodall, H. (2004). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin's. Epitropaki, 0., Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal oprplied Psychology, 90(4), 659--676. Errol, E. J., Bruce, E. W. (2005). correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizati