SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Ethical Leadership and Workplace Bullying in Higher Education

Yükseköğretimde Etik Liderlik ve İşyeri Zorbalığı

Hakan ERKUTLU
Jamel CHAFRA
Pages
55–67
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results revealed a significant negative relationship between ethical leadership and bullying and mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between ethical leadership and workplace bullying and the mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of this study is composed of 591 faculty members along with their deans from 9 private universities chosen by random method in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya and Gaziantep in 2011-2012 spring semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results revealed a significant negative relationship between ethical leadership and bullying and mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between ethical leadership and workplace bullying and the mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship in higher education. The sample of this study is composed of 591 faculty members along with their deans from 9 private universities chosen by random method in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya and Gaziantep in 2011-2012 spring semester. Faculty members’ perceptions of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment were measured using the scale developed by Kahn (1990) and psychological contract fulfillment scale developed by Robinson and Morrison (1995). Brown, Treviño, and Harrison’s (2005) ethical leadership scale and Einarsen and Hoel’s (2001) the Negative Act Questionnaire-Revised scale were used to assess faculty member’s perception of the ethical leadership and workplace bullying respectively. The results revealed a significant negative relationship between ethical leadership and bullying and mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship

Özet

Bu çalışma yükseköğretimde etik liderlik ve işyeri zorbalığı arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmini kavramlarının aracılık rollerini araştırmaktır. Çalışma 2011-2012 bahar eğitimöğretim döneminde İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya ve Gaziantep illerinde bulunan ve rastlantısal olarak seçilen 9 vakıf üniversitesindeki 591 öğretim üyesi ve dekanlarını kapsamaktadır. Öğretim üyelerinin psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmin düzeyleri sırasıyla Kahn (1990) tarafından geliştirilmiş "psikolojik güvenlik ölçeği" ile Robinson ve Morrison (1995) tarafından geliştirilmiş "psikolojik sözleşme tatmin ölçeği" ile değerlendirilmiştir. Brown, Treviño, ve Harrison'un (2005) "etik liderlik ölçeği" ile Einarsen ve Hoel'in (2001) "gözden geçirilmiş işyeri zorbalığı ölçeği" öğretim üyelerinin bağlı bulundukları fakülte dekanlarının etik liderlik düzeyleri ve işyeri zorbalığı algılarını ölçmektedir. Sonuçlar etik liderlik ile işyeri zorbalığı arasında olumsuz ve önemli bir ilişki ve bu ilişkide psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmin kavramlarında aracılık rolleri bulunduğunu göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUTLU, H., CHAFRA, J. (2022). Ethical Leadership and Workplace Bullying in Higher Education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 55–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/531949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Apaydın, C. (2012). Relationship between workplace bullying and organizational cynicism in Turkish public universities. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 9649-9657.
  2. Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717-741.
  3. Aquino, K., Tripp, T., & Bies, R. (2001). How employees respond to interpersonal offense: The effects of blame attribution, offender status, and victim status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52-59.
  4. Aydın, O., & Öcel, H. (2009). The Negative Acts Questionnaire: A study for validity and reliability. Turkish Psychological Articles, 12(24), 94-106.
  5. Baillien, E., Neyens, I., De Witte, H., & De Cuyper, N. (2009). Towards a Three Way Model of Workplace Bullying: a Qualitative Study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1-16.
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182. Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Brown, M., Treviño, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
  7. Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 81–98.
  8. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stilleri ile yıldırma arasındaki ilişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 33, 77-87.
  9. Chiu, S., & Peng, J. (2008). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employee deviance: The moderating role of hostile attributional style. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 426–433.
  10. Dutton, J. (2003). Energize Your Workplace: How to Build and Sustain High-Quality Relationships at Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Dutton, J., & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high-quality relationships at work. In K. Cameron,