Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Authentic Leadership and Organizational Job Embeddedness in Higher Education

Yükseköğretimde Otantik Liderlik ve Örgütsel İşe Gömülmüşlük

Pages
413–426
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results revealed a significant and positive relationship between authentic leadership and organizational job embeddedness and mediating roles of psychological ownership and self-concordance on that relationship

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between authentic leadership and organizational job embeddedness and the mediating roles of psychological ownership and self-concordance on that relationship in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample encompasses 1193 faculty members along with their deans from randomly selected 13 universities in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Antalya, Bursa, Samsun and Gaziantep during 2013-2014 spring semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results revealed a significant and positive relationship between authentic leadership and organizational job embeddedness and mediating roles of psychological ownership and self-concordance on that relationship
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between authentic leadership and organizational job embeddedness and the mediating roles of psychological ownership and self-concordance on that relationship in higher education. The study sample encompasses 1193 faculty members along with their deans from randomly selected 13 universities in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Antalya, Bursa, Samsun and Gaziantep during 2013-2014 spring semester. Faculty member’s perceptions of psychological ownership, self-concordance and organizational job embeddedness were measured using the Psychological Ownership Scale developed by Van Dyne and Pierce (2004), Perceived Locus of Causality Scale developed by Sheldon and Elliot (1999) and Organization Embeddedness Scale developed by Mitchell, Holtom, Lee, Sablynski, and Erez (2001) respectively. Avolio, Gardner, and Walumbwa’s (2007) Authentic Leadership Questionnaire was used to assess faculty dean’s authentic leadership behaviors. The results revealed a significant and positive relationship between authentic leadership and organizational job embeddedness and mediating roles of psychological ownership and self-concordance on that relationship

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı yüksek eğitimde otantik liderlik ve örgütsel işe gömülmüşlük arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sahiplik ve öz-uyum kavramlarının aracılık rollerini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini 2013-2014 ilkbahar döneminde İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Antalya, Bursa, Samsun ve Gaziantep'te rastlantısal yöntemle seçilen 13 üniversitedeki 1193 öğretim üyesi ve onların dekanları oluşturmaktadır. Öğretim üyelerinin psikolojik sahiplik, öz-uyum ve örgütsel işe gömülmüşlük düzeyleri sırasıyla Van Dyne ve Pierce (2004) tarafından geliştirilen Psikolojik Sahiplik Ölçeği, Sheldon ve Elliot (1999) tarafından geliştirilen Davranış Nedenselliğinin Odağı Ölçeği ve Mitchell, Holtom, Lee, Sablynski ve Erez (2001) tarafından geliştirilen Örgütsel İşe Gömülmüşlük Ölçeği kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Fakülte dekanlarının otantik liderlik davranışlarını değerlendirmek için Avolio, Gardner ve Walumbwa'nın (2007) Otantik Liderlik Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar otantik liderlik ile örgütsel işe gömülmüşlük arasında önemli ve olumlu bir ilişki ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sahiplik ve öz-uyum kavramlarında aracılık rolleri bulunduğunu göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUTLU, H., CHAFRA, J. (2022). Authentic Leadership and Organizational Job Embeddedness in Higher Education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 413–426. https://ajindex.com/articles/531745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 48-70.
  2. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.
  3. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2007). Authentic Leadership Questionnaire [Çevrim-içi: http://www.mindgarden.com], Erişim tarihi: 26 Ağustos 2014.
  4. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801–823.
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173– 1182. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Shatter the glass ceiling: Women may make better managers. Human Resource Management, 33, 549-560.
  6. Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of the leader–member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567.
  7. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
  8. Birsel, M., Boru, D., Islamoglu, G., & Yurtkoru, E. S. (2012). Job embeddedness in relation with different socio demographic characteristics. Öneri, 51, 51-61.
  9. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Academic Press.
  10. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554–571.
  11. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
  12. Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 81–98.
  13. Cassar, V., & Buttigieg, S. (2013). An Examination of the Relationship between Authentic Leadership and Psychological Well-Being and the Mediating Role of Meaningfulness at Work. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(5), 171-183.
  14. Davidson, T., & De Stobbeleir, K. E. M. (2011). Shaping environments conduci