SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Yükseköğretimde Yardımsever Liderlik ve Kişilerarası Sapkın Davranışlar

Benevolent Leadership and Interpersonal Deviant Behaviors in Higher Education

Hakan Vahit ERKUTLU
Pages
107–124
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results revealed a significant negative relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and fully mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and the mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample included 1190 faculty members along with their 78 department chairs in 13 universities selected by the cluster random-sampling method in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Adana, Bursa, Samsun, Kayseri, Erzurum and Gaziantep.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results revealed a significant negative relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and fully mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and the mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship in higher education. The study sample included 1190 faculty members along with their 78 department chairs in 13 universities selected by the cluster random-sampling method in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Adana, Bursa, Samsun, Kayseri, Erzurum and Gaziantep. It was completed in 9 January – 24 February 2017. Faculty member’s perceptions of psychological capital, psychological ownership and benevolent leadership were measured using “the Psychological Capital Questionnaire” developed by Luthans, Youssef, & Avolio (2007), “the Psychological Ownership Scale” developed by Avey, Avolio, Crossley, & Luthans (2008) and Cheng, Chou, & Farh’s (2000) “Benevolent Leadership Scale” respectively. Bennett and Robinson’s (2000) “Interpersonal Deviance Scale” was used to assess department chair’s perception of the interpersonal deviance. Results revealed a significant negative relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and fully mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı yükseköğretimde yardımsever liderlik ve kişilerarası sapkınlık arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sermaye ve psikolojik sahiplik kavramlarının aracılık rollerini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Adana, Bursa, Samsun, Kayseri, Erzurum ve Gaziantep'te tesadüfi küme örneklemesi yöntemi ile seçilmiş olan 13 üniversitedeki 1190 öğretim üyesi ve onların 78 bölüm başkanı oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma 9 Ocak- 24 Şubat 2017 tarihleri arasında tamamlanmıştır. Öğretim üyelerinin psikolojik sermaye, psikolojik sahiplik ve yardımsever liderlik algılamaları sırasıyla Luthans, Youssef ve Avolio (2007) tarafından geliştirilen "Psikolojik Sermaye Ölçeği", Avey, Avolio, Crossley ve Luthan (2008) tarafından geliştirilen "Psikolojik Sahiplik Ölçeği" ve Cheng, Chou ve Farh'ın (2000) "Yardımsever Liderlik Ölçeği" kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Bölüm başkanlarının kişilerarası sapkınlık algılamalarını değerlendirmek için Bennett ve Robinson'un (2000) "Kişilerarası Sapkınlık Ölçeği" kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar yardımsever liderlik ile kişilerarası sapkınlık davranışı arasında olumsuz ve önemli bir ilişki ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sermaye ve psikolojik sahiplik kavramların tam aracılık rolleri bulunduğunu göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUTLU, H. V. (2022). Yükseköğretimde Yardımsever Liderlik ve Kişilerarası Sapkın Davranışlar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 107–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/531709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Avey, J., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. (2009). Psychological capital: a positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48, 677–693.
  2. Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. R., & Luthans, F. (2008). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions and analysis of a multi-dimensional theory-based measure. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 30, 173-191.
  3. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the Process of Ethical Leadership: The Mediating Role of Employee Voice and Psychological Ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach to representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87.
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173– 1182. Basik, K. (2010). Expanding the boundaries of behavioral integrity in organizations. (Dissertation thesis), Florida State University, Talllahassee, FL. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
  6. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.
  7. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003).
  8. The Past, Present and Future of Workplace Deviance Research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science (pp. 247–281).
  9. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Academic Press.
  10. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
  11. Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632.
  12. Caldwell, C., & Hayes, L. A. (2007). Leadership, trustworthiness, a