Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

The Role of Teacher’s Feedback in Physical Education: Motivational Climate as Mediator

Beden Eğitiminde Öğretmen Geribildiriminin Rolü: Aracı Değişken Olarak Motivasyonel İklim

Pages
372–386
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results were discussed in terms of implications for physical education environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the role of perceived teachers’ feedback on the relationship among students’ perceptions of motivational climate, intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, enjoyment and concentration in physical education lessons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total of 835 middle school students (MAge = 12.83 ± 0.67) voluntarily participated to the cross-sectional data collection.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results were discussed in terms of implications for physical education environment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of perceived teachers’ feedback on the relationship among students’ perceptions of motivational climate, intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, enjoyment and concentration in physical education lessons. Total of 835 middle school students (MAge = 12.83 ± 0.67) voluntarily participated to the cross-sectional data collection. Convenience sampling was used to select schools from Denizli. Structural Equation Modelling showed that knowledge of performance feedback positively predicted perceived performance approach climate and perceived mastery climate positively predicted enjoyment, concentration and intrinsic motivation. Furthermore, perceived motivational climate was not found to mediate the relationship among perceived teacher feedback, motivation and lesson engagement. The results were discussed in terms of implications for physical education environment.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, beden eğitimi derslerinde öğretmenin geribildiriminin öğrencilerin algılanan motivasyonel iklim, içsel ve dışsal motivasyon, eğlence ve konsantrasyon düzeyleri üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Kesitsel veri toplamaya toplam 835 ortaokul öğrencisi (XYaş = 12.83 ± 0.67) gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Denizli ilinden okulların seçiminde uygun örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modeli sonuçları, performans bilgisi geribildiriminin algılanan performans yaklaşımı ikliminin pozitif tahmin edicisi olduğunu ve algılanan ustalık ikliminin eğlence, konsantrasyon ve içsel motivasyonun pozitif tahmin edicisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bunun yanında, algılanan motivasyonel iklimin, algılanan öğretmen geribildirimi ile motivasyon, eğlence ve konsantrasyon arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık etmediği belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, beden eğitimi ortamı için anlamı bakımından tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AŞÇI, H., İLKER, G. E. (2022). The Role of Teacher’s Feedback in Physical Education: Motivational Climate as Mediator. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 372–386. https://ajindex.com/articles/531638

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agbuga, B., & Xiang, P. (2008). Achievement goals and their relations to self-reported persistence/effort in secondary physical education: A trichotomous achievement goal framework. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 179-191.
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261– 271. Amorose, A.J. & Weiss, M.R. (1998). Coaching feedback as a source of ınformation about perceptions of ability: A developmental examination. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20(4), 395-420.
  3. Anderssen, N. & Wold, B. (1992). Parental and peer influences on leisure-time physical activity in young adolescents. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 4, 341-348.
  4. Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). Amos (Version 21.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS. Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G. & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 2, 360-364.
  5. Braithwaite, R., Spray, C.M., & Warburton, V.E. (2011). Motivational climate interventions in physical education: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 628-638.
  6. Brunel, P. C. (1999). Relationship between achievement goal orientations and perceived motivational climate on intrinsic motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 9, 365-374.
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Rahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Cury, F., Biddle, S., Famose, J.P., Goudas, M., Sarrazin P. & Durand, M. (1996). Personal and situational factors influencing intrinsic interest of adolescent girls in school physical education: A structural equation modelling analysis. Educational Psychology, 16 (3), 305-315.
  8. Cury, F., Elliot, A., Sarrazin, P., Da Fonseca, D., & Rufo, M. (2002). The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: a sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 473–481.
  9. Daşdan Ada, E.N., Aşçı, F. H., Kazak Çetinkalp, F.Z., & Altıparmak, M. E. (2012). Durumsal Güdülenme Ölçeği’nin (DGÖ) beden eğitimi ders ortamı için geçerlik ve güvenirliği. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 10 (1), 7-12.
  10. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Deci, E.L., Cascio W.F. & Krusell, J. (1975). Cognitive evaluation theory and some comments on the Calder and Staw critique. Journal of Personality and So