SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Exploring Fundamental Problematic Issues and Areas of Inquiry in Turkish Secondary Education: A Mixed Method Research

Türkiye Ortaöğretiminde Temel Sorun Alanları ile Bilgi İhtiyacı Duyulan Araştırma Alanlarının Tespit Edilmesine Yönelik Karma Bir Araştırma

Sait GÜRBÜZ
İhsan AYTEKİN
Mehmet BARCA
Pages
107–129
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it was found that teachers' qualifications and motivation of teachers, philosophy and strategy of national education, content and method of education, counselling and motivation, selection and placement system and measurement and evaluation systems are the fundamental problematic issues that need to be solved and investigated

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Solving problems that hinder the educational success, the analyzing of current internal and external situation in order to develop effective strategy and policy, and the need to identify the problem areas with systematic research in national education is becoming progressively important.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The qualitative part of the research has been carried out with grounded theory method using a sample of 57 principals, and the quantitative part with survey research method using a sample of 238 principals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it was found that teachers' qualifications and motivation of teachers, philosophy and strategy of national education, content and method of education, counselling and motivation, selection and placement system and measurement and evaluation systems are the fundamental problematic issues that need to be solved and investigated
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Solving problems that hinder the educational success, the analyzing of current internal and external situation in order to develop effective strategy and policy, and the need to identify the problem areas with systematic research in national education is becoming progressively important. The purpose of this study is to determine the fundamental problematic areas that need to be solved and areas of inquiry regarding secondary education to develop and implement an effective education system in the Turkish secondary education by using mixed research method. The qualitative part of the research has been carried out with grounded theory method using a sample of 57 principals, and the quantitative part with survey research method using a sample of 238 principals. As a result of the study, it was found that teachers' qualifications and motivation of teachers, philosophy and strategy of national education, content and method of education, counselling and motivation, selection and placement system and measurement and evaluation systems are the fundamental problematic issues that need to be solved and investigated

Özet

Milli eğitimde, etkin strateji ve politikaların geliştirilmesi ve eğitim başarısı önünde engel teşkil eden sorunların çözülmesi için mevcut iç ve dış durumun analiz edilmesi, sorun alanlarının doğru bir şekilde tespit edilmesine yönelik sistematik araştırma ihtiyacı gittikçe önemli hâle gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; ortaöğretimde etkin bir eğitim sisteminin geliştirilebilmesi ve uygulanabilmesi için ortaöğretim ile ilgili çözülmesi gereken temel sorun alanlarını ve bilgi ihtiyacı hissedilen temel araştırma alanlarını, karma araştırma yöntemi kullanarak tespit etmektir. Araştırmanın nitel kısmı gömülü kuram (grounded theory) yöntemi kullanılarak 57 okul müdüründen oluşan bir çalışma grubu ile nicel kısmı ise tarama araştırma (survey research) yöntemi kullanılarak 238 okul müdüründen oluşan bir çalışma grubu ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, öğretmen nitelik ve motivasyonu, milli eğitim felsefesi ve stratejisi, eğitimin içerik ve yöntemi, rehberlik ve motivasyon, seçme ve yerleştirme sistemi ile ölçme ve değerlendirme sistemleri, araştırılması ve çözüm üretilmesi gereken temel sorun alanları olarak saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRBÜZ, S., AYTEKİN, İ., BARCA, M. (2022). Exploring Fundamental Problematic Issues and Areas of Inquiry in Turkish Secondary Education: A Mixed Method Research. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 107–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/531517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alacacı, C., ve Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 182–192.
  2. Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., ve Letendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman Loxley Effect” on Mathematics and Science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46, 291–312.
  3. Baldwin, R. G. (1990). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In J. Schuster and D. Wheeler (Eds.), Enhancing faculty careers (pp. 20–40).
  4. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Balyer, A., ve Gündüz, Y. (2011). Değişik ülkelerde okul müdürlerinin yetiştirilmesi: Türk eğitim sistemi için bir model önerisi, Kurumsal Eğitimbilim, 4(2), 182-197.
  5. Beycioğlu, K., ve Dönmez, B. (2009).
  6. Rethinking educational supervision, İnonu University Journal of The Facultu of Education, 10 (2), 71-93.
  7. Börkan, B., ve Bakış, O. (2016). Determinants of academic achievement of middle schoolers in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 2193–2217.
  8. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3.Baskı). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. İçinde: A. C. Porter and A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150–197).
  10. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  11. Callan, G. L., Marchant, G. J., Finch, W. H., ve German, R. L. (2016). Metacognition, strategies, achievement, and demographics: Relationships across countries. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 1485–1502.
  12. Can, E. (2017). Öğrenci görüşlerine göre merkezi sınavların etkilerinin belirlenmesi, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(58), 108-122.
  13. Carvalho, M., Gamboa, L. F., ve Waltenberg, F. D. (2012). Equality of educational opportunity employing PISA data: Taking both achievement and access into account. Working Paper Series, Retriewed from: http:// www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-277.pdf Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, F., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., ve York. R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. Çalışkan, Ş., Karabacak, M., ve Meçik