Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Autonomous Teacher Training Eligibility of the Council of Higher Education’s 2018 Turkish Language Teaching Undergraduate Program: A Mixed Method Research

Yükseköğretim Kurulu 2018-Türkçe Öğretmenliği Lisans Programı’nın Özerk Öğretmen Yetiştirme Elverişliliği: Bir Karma Yöntem Araştırması

Pages
606–628
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research point to the importance and possibilities of developing teacher autonomy in new Turkish language education undergraduate programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Restrictors of teacher autonomy are frequently investigated in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yet, the obligations of teacher training on this issue have not been sufficiently emphasized.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research point to the importance and possibilities of developing teacher autonomy in new Turkish language education undergraduate programs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Restrictors of teacher autonomy are frequently investigated in the literature. Yet, the obligations of teacher training on this issue have not been sufficiently emphasized. In this study based on this deficiency, the adequacy of the central Turkish Language Education Undergraduate Program to develop teacher autonomy was examined. According to the findings obtained from this study, conducted according to the convergent parallel mixed-method, it was observed that the central Turkish Language Education Undergraduate Program was insufficient in terms of improving teacher autonomy. The research point to the importance and possibilities of developing teacher autonomy in new Turkish language education undergraduate programs.

Özet

Öğretmen özerkliğinin kısıtlayıcıları alanyazında sıklıkla ele alınmaktadır. Ancak öğretmen eğitiminin bu konudaki yükümlülükleri üzerinde yeterince durulmamıştır. Bu eksiklikten yola çıkarak gerçekleştirilen bu araştırmada merkezî Türkçe Öğretmenliği Lisans Programı’nın öğretmen özerkliğini geliştirme yeterliliği incelenmiştir. Karma yöntem yakınsayan koşut desene göre gerçekleştirilen bu araştırmada, merkezi Türkçe Öğretmenliği Lisans Programı’nın öğretmen özerkliğini geliştirme açısından yetersiz olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırma Türkçe öğretmenliği lisans programlarında öğretmen özerkliğinin geliştirilmesine yönelik içerik oluşturmanın önemini vurgulamakta ve olanaklarına işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAR, M. A. (2022). Autonomous Teacher Training Eligibility of the Council of Higher Education’s 2018 Turkish Language Teaching Undergraduate Program: A Mixed Method Research. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 606–628. https://ajindex.com/articles/531471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adams, G., & Povey, H. (2018). “Now there’s everything to stop you”: Teacher autonomy then and now. In M. Jurdak, & R. Vithal (Eds.), ICME-13 Monographs (s. 209-230).
  2. Springer. Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641-652.
  3. Amado, D., Del Villar, F., Leo, F. M., Sanchez Oliva, D., & Sanchez Miguel, G. C. (2014). Effect of a multi-dimensional intervention programme on the motivation of physical education students. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 1-6.
  4. Anderson, L. W. (1987). The decline of teacher autonomy: teers or cheers? International Review of Education, 3(3), 357-373.
  5. Angel Alvarado, R., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Belletich, O. (2020). Teaching autonomy: does Spanish education system achieve the desired effect? Psychology, Society, & Education, 12(1), 85-96.
  6. Angelle, P. M., & Teague, G. (2014). Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: Teacher perceptions in three US school districts. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 738 - 753. Aoki, N. (2007). Aspects of teacher autonomy: Capacity, freedom, and responsibility. In P. Benson, & S. Toogod (Eds.), Learner autonomy 7: Challenges to research and practice (s. 110-124). Dublin: Authentik. Ayral, M., Özdemir, N., Türedi, A., Yılmaz Fındık, L., Büyükgöze, H., Demirezen, S.,. Tahirbegi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teacher autonomy and student achievement: PISA sample. Journal of Educational Sciences Research International E-Journal, 4, 208-218.
  7. Bahar, M. A. (2017). The effect of metacognitive reading training according to 4MAT teaching system on the level of using metacognitive reading strategies and reading comprehension of factual informative texts. (Unpublished PhD thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
  8. Bakioğlu, A., & Baltacı, R. (2013). Güney Kore eğitim sistemi. In A. Bakioğlu (Eds.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yönetimi: PISA’da başarılı ülkelerin eğitim sistemleri (pp. 43-87). Ankara:
  9. Nobel. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. Barfield, A., Ashwell, T., Carroll, M., Collins, K., Cowie, N., Critchley, M.,. Robertson, M. C. (2002). Exploring and defining teacher autonomy. On developing autonomy: proceedings of the JALT college and university educators' conference (pp. 217-222). Tokyo: JALT. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. New York: Longman. Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English langu