SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between Organizational Trust and Personal Initiative: The Case of Healthcare Professionals

Hüseyin DEMİR
Elif Türkan ARSLAN
Pages
103–125
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be claimed that strengthening of healthcare professionals by supporting them would be efficient in the formation of the culture of initiative taking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is aimed to investigate both the relationship between the organizational level of trust and the status of initiative taking of healthcare professionals and if the status of initiative taking and the level of organizational trust differ according to demographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population and sample comprise of 400 and 196 healthcare professionals, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be claimed that strengthening of healthcare professionals by supporting them would be efficient in the formation of the culture of initiative taking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organizational trust · Personal initiative · Active performance

Özet

It is aimed to investigate both the relationship between the organizational level of trust and the status of initiative taking of healthcare professionals and if the status of initiative taking and the level of organizational trust differ according to demographic variables. The population and sample comprise of 400 and 196 healthcare professionals, respectively. By using convenience sampling method 161 people can be reached. The relationship between the variables is explored with Spearman correlation coefficient and simple linear regression analysis. In the analysis, independent two samples, t test and one-way ANOVA analysis are utilized. In the advanced level research Tukey HSD test is used. It is determined that there is a moderate level of organizational trust and initiative taking among healthcare professionals, and there is a positive but weak relationship between the level of organizational trust and the status of initiative taking. The level of organizational trust can explain approximately 20% of the personal initiative behavior. It can be claimed that strengthening of healthcare professionals by supporting them would be efficient in the formation of the culture of initiative taking.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, H., ARSLAN, E. T. (2022). The Relationship between Organizational Trust and Personal Initiative: The Case of Healthcare Professionals. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 103–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/530996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akın U. (2012) Public elementary school principals? taking personal initiative and its relation with their self-efficacy. Ankara University Educational Sciences Institute PhD Thesis, Ankara
  2. Alpar R. (2013) Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler. Detay Yayıncılık, Dördüncü Baskı, Ankara
  3. Alpar R. (2016) Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, Dördüncü Baskı, Ankara
  4. Altuntaş S. (2008) Hemşirelerin Örgütsel Güven Düzeyleri ile Kişisel-Mesleki Özellikleri ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışları Arasındaki İlişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, İstanbul
  5. Ashnai B., Henneberg S. C., Naudé P. and Francescucci A. (2016) Inter-Personal and Inter-Organizational Trust In Business Relationships: An Attitude–Behavior–Outcome Model. Industrial Marketing Management 52(4): 128–139
  6. Baek Y. M. and Jung C. S. (2015) Focusing the Mediating Role of Institutional Trust: How Does Interpersonal Trust Promote Organizational Commitment? The Social Science Journal 52: 481–489
  7. Baer M. and Frese M. (2003) Innovation Is Not Enough: Climates for Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations, and Firm Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24(1): 45–68
  8. Baş T. (2006) Anket Nasıl Hazırlanır, Uygulanır, Değerlendirilir? Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara
  9. Belschak F., Den Hartog D. and Fay D. (2010) Exploring Positive, Negative and Context-Dependent Aspects of Proactive Behaviors at Work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83: 267-273
  10. Frese M. and Fay D. (2001) Personal Initiative (PI): A Concept for Work in the 21st Century. Research in Organizational Behavior 23: 133–188
  11. Frese M., Fay D., Leng K., Hilburger T. and Tag A. (1997) The Concept of Personal Initiative: Operationalization, Reliability and Validity in Two German Samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 70(2): 139–161
  12. Frese M., Kring W., Soose A. and Zempel J. (1996) Personal Initiative at Work: Differences Between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal 39(1): 37–63
  13. Gamboa J. P., Gracia F., Ripoll P. and Peiro J. M. (2009) Employability and Personal Initiative As Antecedents of Job Satisfaction. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 12(2): 632–640
  14. Grant A., Nurmohamed S., Ashford S. and Dekas K. (2011) The Performance Implications of Ambivalent Initiative: The Interplay of Autonomous and Controlled Motiva