Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2003 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı:

Detection and frequency analysis of a slower electrophoretical allele at GPDH locus in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster from Turkey

Pages
37–41
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A comparison with another locus, Adh (alcohol dehydrogenase), from the same individual flies indicates that this lower frequency could be explained less by sampling error (drift).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A new allele of aGpdh locus was detected in a population Drosophila melanogaster from Ankara province of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This allele (designated S') is slower in mobility than the common Slow (S) allele at aGpdh locus and appears in low frequency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A comparison with another locus, Adh (alcohol dehydrogenase), from the same individual flies indicates that this lower frequency could be explained less by sampling error (drift).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A new allele of aGpdh locus was detected in a population Drosophila melanogaster from Ankara province of Turkey. This allele (designated S') is slower in mobility than the common Slow (S) allele at aGpdh locus and appears in low frequency. A comparison with another locus, Adh (alcohol dehydrogenase), from the same individual flies indicates that this lower frequency could be explained less by sampling error (drift).

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZSOY, E. D. (2022). Detection and frequency analysis of a slower electrophoretical allele at GPDH locus in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster from Turkey. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 32 - Sayı:, 37–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/529417

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lewontin, R.C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Colombia University Press, NY, 1974. 2.Barbadilla, A., King, L.M. and Lewontin, R.C. What does electrophoretical variation tell us abo'ut protein variation? Mol.Biol.Evol. 13: 427-432, 1996. 3.Kamping, A. On the maintenance of allozyme and inversion polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster: Interactions between Adh, aGpdh and In(2L)t. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen, 2000. 4.Kamping, A. and Van Delden, W. A long term study on interactions between the Adh, aGpdh allozyme polymorphisms and the chromosomal inversion In(2L)t in a seminatural population of Drosophila melanogaster. J.Evol.Biol. 12: 809-821, 1999. 5.Van Delden, W. and Kamping, A. Worldwide latitudinal clines for the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster: What is the unit of selection? In: Environmental Stress, Adaptation and Evolution, Eds.: R.Bijlsma and V.Loeschke, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 97-115,1997. 6.Van Delden, W. and Kamping, A. The association between the polymorphisms at the Adh and aGpdh loci and the In(2L)t inversion in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to temperature. Evolution. 43: 775-793,1989. 7.Weir, B.S. Genetic Data Analysis II. Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data. Sinauer Assc. Sunderland, MA, 1996. 8.Kamping, A. and Van Delden, W. Biochemical differences between aGpdh genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. D.I.S. 70: 117-118,1991.