Effects of photoperiod on testis development of insecticide resistant and susceptible populatiions of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)
The effect of photoperiod was evaluated by measuring the length, width and volume of the testis of both the resistant and susceptible strain.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to examine the influences of different photoperiod regimes on selected testis development parameters in relation to insecticide resistance and susceptible strains of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), under laboratory conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The control stocks were bred under 12/12 hr L:D (hours light:dark) photoperiod condition, and experimental stocks were bred under 0/24 hr, 6/18 hr, 12/12 hr and 18/6 hr L:D photoperiod conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The effect of photoperiod was evaluated by measuring the length, width and volume of the testis of both the resistant and susceptible strain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The present study was conducted to examine the influences of different photoperiod regimes on selected testis development parameters in relation to insecticide resistance and susceptible strains of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), under laboratory conditions. The control stocks were bred under 12/12 hr L:D (hours light:dark) photoperiod condition, and experimental stocks were bred under 0/24 hr, 6/18 hr, 12/12 hr and 18/6 hr L:D photoperiod conditions. The effect of photoperiod was evaluated by measuring the length, width and volume of the testis of both the resistant and susceptible strain.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÇAĞLAR, S. S., SAĞLAM, İ. K. (2022). Effects of photoperiod on testis development of insecticide resistant and susceptible populatiions of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 34 - Sayı:, 43–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/529400
French, A. and Hoopingarmer, R., Gametogenesis in the House fly, Musca domestica. Ann. Ento. Soc. Amer., 58: 650-657, 1965. 2.Keiding, J., The house fly training and information guide. WHO Vector Biology and Control Division, Vector Control Series, WHO 63: 30.86, 1986. 3.Lachance, L.E, Degrugillier, M., Leverich, A.P., Comperative effects of chemosterilants on the spermatogenic stages in house fly. 2 Recovery of fertility and sperm transfer in successive matings after sterilization with 1,3-Propanediol Dimethanesulfate or X-rays. Ann. Ento. Soc. Amer., 63: 422-428, 1970. 4.Şişli, M.N., Boşgelmez, A., Koçak, O., Porsuk, H., Karasinek, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) populasyonlarma Malathion, Fenitrothion ve Propoxur'un etkisi. Microbiol. Bull., 17: 49-62, 1983. 5.Şişli, M. N., Koçak, O., Çağlar, S. S. and Eryılmaz A., Life table studies on the wild and susceptible population of house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) and the effects of malathion, fenithrothion and propoxur on these populations. TÜBİTAK II. Ulusal Çev. Simp. Tebliğ. Metinleri, 817-824, 1984. 6.Çağlar, S.S., The investigation on resistance level to Tetramethrin of housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) and life table studies. Doğa Tr. J. of Zool., 15: 91-97, 1991. 7.Çağlar, S.S., Effects of photoperiod on population dynamics of Tetramethrin resistant population of housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Volume 14, Series A, 21-37, 1993. 8.Ruberson, J.R., Shen, Y.J., and Kring T.J., Photoperiodic sensitivity and diapause in the predator Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 93 (5): 1123-1130,2000. 9.Çağlar, S.S., Akıner, M., Yazgan, N., Resistance to Organophosphate and Pyrethroid insecticides in different populations of Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) Proceedings of thel3th European SOVE Meeting, 246-251, 2001. 10.Pienarr, R. de V. Combinations and variations of techniques for improved chromosome studies in the Graminae. J. S. African Bot. 21: 1-8, 1955. 11.Conn, H.J., Darrow, M.A. and Emmel. V. M., Staining procedures. Williams and Wilkens Co., Baltimore, Maryland. 289 p., 1960. 12.Holt, G.G, North, D.T., Spermatogenesis in the cabbage leaf hopper, Tricholoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Ento. Soc. Amer., 63: 501-507, 1970. 13.Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J., Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Co. San Fransisco. 776 p., 1981. 14.Hodgson, E., Comparative studies of