Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

Distribution of two pine processionary moth species in Turkey evidences a contact zone

Pages
868–876
Publication Date
2015-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results bring up interesting questions relating to the evolution of the identified hybrid zone.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The pine processionary moths Thaumetopoea pityocampa and T.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to reveal the limits of the ranges of the two species in Turkey by using nuclear (ITS-1, photolyase) and mitochondrial markers (COI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results bring up interesting questions relating to the evolution of the identified hybrid zone.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pine processionary moth · Thaumetopoea pityocampa · T. wilkinsoni

Abstract

The pine processionary moths Thaumetopoea pityocampa and T. Wilkinsoni are among the most important Mediterranean pine defoliators. Although recent studies suggest that the two species may coexist in Turkey, the relevant literature lacks precise information on the occurrence and exact distribution of the two species in this country. In particular, whether the two sister taxa form a contact zone is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to reveal the limits of the ranges of the two species in Turkey by using nuclear (ITS-1, photolyase) and mitochondrial markers (COI). Multilocus molecular characterization of the two species showed for the first time that the two species co-occur in some of the sampling sites. In addition, we determined clear signatures of mitochondrial introgression between the two species, and therefore the existence of a possible hybrid zone within Turkey. These results bring up interesting questions relating to the evolution of the identified hybrid zone.

Özet

The pine processionary moths Thaumetopoea pityocampa and T. Wilkinsoni are among the most important Mediterranean pine defoliators. Although recent studies suggest that the two species may coexist in Turkey, the relevant literature lacks precise information on the occurrence and exact distribution of the two species in this country. In particular, whether the two sister taxa form a contact zone is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to reveal the limits of the ranges of the two species in Turkey by using nuclear (ITS-1, photolyase) and mitochondrial markers (COI). Multilocus molecular characterization of the two species showed for the first time that the two species co-occur in some of the sampling sites. In addition, we determined clear signatures of mitochondrial introgression between the two species, and therefore the existence of a possible hybrid zone within Turkey. These results bring up interesting questions relating to the evolution of the identified hybrid zone.

🔖

Cite This Article

İPEKDAL, K., BURBAN, C., KERDELHUE, C., ÇAĞLAR, S. S. (2015). Distribution of two pine processionary moth species in Turkey evidences a contact zone. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 868–876. https://ajindex.com/articles/176613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acatay A (1953). Çam kese böceği (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. = Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams) hakkında araştırmalar ve adalardaki mücadelesi. İ.Ü. Ormn Fak Dergisi 3: 29–47 (in Turkish). Barton NH (1982). The structure of the hybrid zone in Uroderma bilobatum (Chiroptera: Phyllostomatidae). Evol 36: 863–866.
  2. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985). Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16: 113–148.
  3. Buckley TR, Cordeiro M, Marshall DC, Simon C (2006). Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand Alpine Cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst Biol 55: 411–425.
  4. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000). TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657–1659. Démolin G (1969).
  5. Bioecology of the pine processionary, Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. Incidence of climatic factors. Boletín del Servicio de Plagas Forestales 23: 1–13.
  6. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998). Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175–185. Frérot B, Demolin G (1993). Sex pheromone of the processionary moths and biosystematic considerations within the genus Thaumetopoea (Thaumetopoeidae, Thaumetopoeinae). Boll Zoll Agr Bachic II 25: 33–40.
  7. Gemmell NJ, Akiyama S (1996). A simple and efficient method for the extraction of DNA. T Genetics 12: 338–339.
  8. Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98.
  9. Hansen MM, Ruzzante DE, Nielsen EE, Mensberg KL (2000). Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism reveals life-history dependent interbreeding between hatchery and wild brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Mol Ecol 9: 583–594.
  10. Hewitt GM (1996). Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 58: 247–276.
  11. Hewitt GM (2003). Ice ages, species distributions, and evolution. In: Rothschild LJ, Lister A, editors. Evolution on Planet Earth: The Impact of the Physical Environment. London, UK: Academic Press.
  12. Howard DJ (1986). A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evol 40: 34–43.
  13. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969). Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, editor. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 21–132. Kerdelhué C, Zane L, Simonato M, Salvato P, Rousselet J, Roques A, Battisti A (2009). Quaternary history and contemporary patterns in a currently expanding species.