Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2010 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

A comparison of two different diets and their restricted groups in relation to developmental time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster

Pages
311–317
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the contrary, the S diet showed significant differences in the yeast and yeast + sugar restricted groups when compared with the respective control and sugar restricted groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effects of dietary conditions on many life history traits have been studied for a long time with Drosophila.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason an optimization protocol for dietary restriction (DR) studies seems to be necessary and in fact recently an optimization protocol published by Bass et al. [1].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the contrary, the S diet showed significant differences in the yeast and yeast + sugar restricted groups when compared with the respective control and sugar restricted groups.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Effects of dietary conditions on many life history traits have been studied for a long time with Drosophila. However, many laboratories use different diets and techniques, which make it difficult to compare the results obtained from various studies. For this reason an optimization protocol for dietary restriction (DR) studies seems to be necessary and in fact recently an optimization protocol published by Bass et al. [1]. In our study we compared the standard diet (S) that we use in our laboratory and the proposed diet (P) with the restricted groups of both diets. In our work, differences between two different dietary protocols with respect to egg-to-adult viability and developmental time were investigated. The P diet did not show any significant differences between the groups with respect to developmental time. On the contrary, the S diet showed significant differences in the yeast and yeast + sugar restricted groups when compared with the respective control and sugar restricted groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNDER, B. Ş. (2022). A comparison of two different diets and their restricted groups in relation to developmental time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 311–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/529290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bass, T.M., Grandison, R.C., Wong, R., Martinez, P., Partridge, L., Piper, M.D.W., Optimization of dietary restriction protocols in Drosophila, J. Gerontol. Biol. Sci., 62(10), 1071, 2007
  2. Heilbronn, L.K., Ravussin, E., Calorie restriction and aging: review of the literature and implications for studies in humans., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 78, 361, 2003
  3. Chippindale, A.K., Leroi, A.M., Kim, S.B., Rose, M.R., Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life-history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction, J. Evol. Biol., 6, 171, 1993
  4. Pletcher, S.D., Macdonald, S.J., Marguerie, R., Certa, U., Stearns, S.C., Goldstein, D.B., Partridge, L., Genome-wide transcript profiles in aging and calorically restricted Drosophila melanogaster, Cur. Biol., 12, 712, 2002
  5. Önder, B.Ş., Yılmaz, M., Özsoy, E.D., Larval food restriction and longevity: Effects on the age specific mortality and mean longevity in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling D. simulans, Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem., 37(1), 1, 2009
  6. Mockett, R.J., Cooper, T.M., Orr, W.C., Sohal, R.S., Effects of caloric restriction are species-specific, Biogerontology, 7, 157, 2006
  7. Mair, W., Piper, M.D., Partridge, L., Calories do not explain extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 7, e223, 2005
  8. Chapman, T., and Partridge, L., Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 263, 755, 1996
  9. Kapahi, P., Zid, B.M., Harper, T., Koslover, D., Sapin, V., Benzer, S., Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 14, 885, 2004
  10. Bross, T.G., Rogina, B., Helfand, S.L., Behavioral, physical, and demographic changes in Drosophila populations through dietary restriction. Aging Cell., 4, 309, 2005
  11. Zwaan, B.J., Bijlsma, R., Hoekstra, R.F., On the developmental theory of ageing. I. Starvation resistance and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster in relation top readult breeding conditions, Heredity, 66, 29, 1991
  12. Partridge, L. and Fowler, K., Direct and correlated responses to selection on at age reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 46, 76, 1992
  13. James, A.C., and Partridge, L., Thermal evolution of rate of larval development in Drosophila melanogaster in laboratory and field populations. J. Evol. Biol. 8, 315, 1995
  14. Zwaan, B.J., Bijlsma, R., Hoeks