Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2004 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation temporomandibular joint functions after the surgical removal of impacted third molars

Gömülü 3. molar diş cerrahisi sonrası temporomandibular eklem fonksiyonlarındaki değişiklikler

Pages
15–21
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: For all the muscle groups, the changes related to time, at the preoperative and postoperative third, seventh and thirtieth days, were statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determinate the subjective findings of the changes at the maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the functions of masticatory muscles (TAR: right temporalis anterior, TAL: left temporalis anterior, MMR: right masseter, MML: left masseter, SCMR: right sternocieidomastoid, SCML: left sternocieidomastoid) after the surgical extractions of both mandibular and maxillary submerged wisdom teeth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In this study, preoperative measurement values of maximum mouth opening and masticatory muscles activities were compared with the postoperative measurements on day 3, 7 and 30 after the extractions of submerged wisdom teeth from maxilla and mandible.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: For all the muscle groups, the changes related to time, at the preoperative and postoperative third, seventh and thirtieth days, were statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determinate the subjective findings of the changes at the maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the functions of masticatory muscles (TAR: right temporalis anterior, TAL: left temporalis anterior, MMR: right masseter, MML: left masseter, SCMR: right sternocieidomastoid, SCML: left sternocieidomastoid) after the surgical extractions of both mandibular and maxillary submerged wisdom teeth. Patients were followed up and the time period they need for returning back to their normal functions were noted. Material and Method: In this study, preoperative measurement values of maximum mouth opening and masticatory muscles activities were compared with the postoperative measurements on day 3, 7 and 30 after the extractions of submerged wisdom teeth from maxilla and mandible. Kinesiograph and EMG (Bio-Pak system, BioResearch Associates, Inc. Milwaukee, USA) were used to determine the maximum mouth opening and masticatory muscles1 functions respectively. Results: For all the muscle groups, the changes related to time, at the preoperative and postoperative third, seventh and thirtieth days, were statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, alt ve üst çene 3. molar dişlerin cerrahi operasyon ile alınmalarının ardından maksimum ağız açıklığı (MAA) ve çiğneme kaslarındaki (TAR:sağ temporalis anterior, TAL:sol temporalis anterior, MMR:sağ masseter, MML:sol masseter, SCMR: sağ sternocieidomastoid, SCML: sol sternocieidomastoid) değişikliklerin sübjektif bulgularının belirlenmesi ve bu bulguların geriye dönme süreçlerinin izlenmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada alt ve üst çene gömülü 3. molar dişlerin cerrahisi öncesi kaydedilen maksimum ağız açıklığı ve çiğneme kas aktivitileri, cerrahi sonrası 3.gün, 7. gün ve 30. gün değerleri ile karşılaştırıldı. Çalışmada maksimum ağız açıklığı kinesiograf, çiğneme kasları aktiviteleri ise EMG ile kaydedildi (Bio-Pak system, BioResearch Associates, Inc. Milwaukee, USA). Bulgular: Tüm kas grupları için operasyon öncesi, cerrahi sonrası 3., 7. ve 30. günlerde zamana bağlı değişimin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu görüldü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKOCAOĞLU, M., KASABOĞLU, O., ÇİFTÇİ, Y., HAYRAN, M., AVCI, M. (2022). The evaluation temporomandibular joint functions after the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 15–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/528568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. De Boever JA, Adriaens PA. Occlusal relationship in patients with pain-dysfunction symptoms in the tem- poromandibular joints. J Oral Rehabil 1983; 10:1
  2. Keskin H, Özdemir T, Tuncer N, Aksoy C. Gnatoloji. İÜ. Basımevi ve Film Merkezi 1997, istanbul 3. Gelb H., Bernstein I. Clinical evaluation of two hundred patients with temporomandibular joint syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 234
  3. Raustia AM., Oikarinen KS. Effect of surgical removal of the mandibular third molars on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction: A pilot study. J Craniomandib Pract 1991; 9: 356-360
  4. Bell WE. Temporomandibular Disorders. Classification, Diagnosis, Management. ed 3. Chicago,1990, Year Book Medical Publishers INC
  5. Mangi Q, Ridgway RF, Ibrahim Z, Evoy D. Dislocation of the mandible. Surg Endosc 2004;14 7. Baba K, Tsukiyama Y, Yamazaki M, Clark T. A review of temporomandibular disorder diagnostic techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86:184-94
  6. Report of acceptance of TMD devices. ADA council on scientific affaires. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1615-6
  7. Bowley JF, Marx DB. Masticatory muscle activity assessment and reliability of a portable electromyo- graphic instrument. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:252-60
  8. Chong-Shan S, Hui-Yun W. Value of EMG analysis of mandibular elevators in open-close-clench cycle to diag- nosing TMJ disturbance syndrome. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:101-7
  9. Rilo B, Da Silva JL, Gude F, Santana U. Myoelektric activity during unilateral chewing in healthy subjects: Cycle duration and order of muscle activation. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:462-6
  10. Bui CH, Seldin EB, Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1379-89
  11. Garcia GA, Gude Sampedro SF, Gandara RJ, Gallas TM. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55:1223-6
  12. Shugars DA, Benson K, White RP Jr, Simpson KN, Bader JD. Developing a measure of patient perceptions of short-term outcomes of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54:1402-8
  13. White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Shafer DM, Laskin DM, Buckley MJ, Phillips C. Recovery after third molar sur- gery: clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61:533-4
  14. Phillips C, White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Zhou X. Risk fac- tors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:1436-48