Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Adhesiv bridges

Adhesiv köprüler

Pages
40–46
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After etching, the metal framework can be bonded to enamel with a composite resin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Adhesive bridges have been a proven minimally invasive treatment option for replacement of a single tooth, with sound or almost intact adjacent abutments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite improved bonding systems available for micromechanical retention of retainers to acidetched tooth surfaces, the survival rate of adhesive bridges remains inferior compared with conventional fixed partial dentures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After etching, the metal framework can be bonded to enamel with a composite resin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Adhesive bridges have been a proven minimally invasive treatment option for replacement of a single tooth, with sound or almost intact adjacent abutments. Despite improved bonding systems available for micromechanical retention of retainers to acidetched tooth surfaces, the survival rate of adhesive bridges remains inferior compared with conventional fixed partial dentures. On the other hand, these restorations have many advantages. This technique is more conservative, hygienic and aesthetic compared with conventional bridge work. The success of this technique depends upon the ability to etch spesific hih modulus, nonprecious alloys. After etching, the metal framework can be bonded to enamel with a composite resin.

Özet

Adhesiv köprüler, tek diş kayıplarında uygulanabilen, invaziv olmayan, boşluğa komşu dişlerde çok az preparasyon gerektiren restorasyonlardır. Mikromekanik tutuculuk için bonding sistemlerde önemli ölçüde gelişme sağlandıysa da, pürüzlendirilmiş mine yüzeyine metalin bağlanması yeterince güçlü olmayabilir. Tutuculuk konvansiyonel sabit protezlere göre daha zayıftır. Öte yandan, bu restorasyonlar, pek çok avantaja sahiptir. Bu teknik konvansiyonel köprülere göre daha estetik, hijyenik ve konservatiftir. Bu tekniğin başarısı kıymetsiz metal alaşımının iyi pürüzlendirilmiş olmasına bağlıdır. Pürüzlendirmeden sonra, metal altyapı mineye kompozit rezinle bağlanır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEKİÇ, C. (2022). Adhesiv bridges. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 40–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/528546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Flood A M, Fracds. Resin bondedprosthesis: Clinical guidelines. Aust Dent.1 1989; 34:209-218.
  2. Wood M, Thompson P. Anterior Etched Cast Resin-Bonded Retainers: An Overview of Design, Fabrication, and Clinical Use. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1983; 4: 247-254. Barrack G. The Etched Cast Restoration- Clinical Techniques and Long-Term Results. Quintessence Int 1993;24:701-713.
  3. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharas K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J. prosth. Dent 2003;90:31-41. Tylman S D. Theory and Practice of Crown and Fixed Partial Prosthodontics ( Bridge ). 6th edt. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company, 1970 Creugers N H J. Resin- Bonded Bridges. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1991; 4:252- 255 Simonsen R J. Clinical Applications of the Acid Etch Technique. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1978
  4. Djemal S, Setchell D, King P, Wickers J. Longterm survival characteristics of 832 resin-rctained bridges and splints provided in a post graduate teaching hospital between 1978 and 1993-1999; 26: 302-320. Creugers NHJ, dekanter JAM. Patients satisfaction in two long-term clinical studies on resin-bonded bridges. J. Oral Rehab. 2000; 27:602-607. Dale B; Kenneth W A. Esthetic Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1993 6.Wood M, Thompson P. Resin- Bonded Prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1993:37:445-455.
  5. Yavuzyilmaz H, Ankan A, Yurdukoru B. Adheziv köprülerin klinik değerlendirilmesi ( 2 yıl süreli klinik çalışma ). A Ü Dişhek Fak Derg 1983; 10: 213-220.
  6. Rosenstiel S F, Land M F. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company, 1988.
  7. Eshleman J R, Janus C E. Jones C R. Tooth preparation designs for resin-bonded fixed partial dentures related to enamel thickness. J Prosthet Dent 1998:60:18-22.
  8. Taleghani M, Leinfelder K, Taleghani A. An alternative to cast etched retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 424- 428. Moschen I, Berger P, Faik M. Comparison of resin-bonded prosthesis groove parallelism with the use of four tooth preparation methods. J. Prosth. Dent. 1999; 82: 398-409. Wassel RW, gagliano G. Effects of adhesive fixed prosthesis retainer design on resultant resin luting agent thickness. J. Prosth. Dent. 1998; 80: 479-84. Moon C P. Bond strenghts of the lost salt procedure: A new rctantion method for resin- bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 65: 782- 786 Ziada HM, Orr JF, Benington 1C. Photoelastic stress analysis in perforated resin bonded bridge design. J. Oral Rehab. 2000; 27: