SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research) / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

In-ceram tozunun kolloidal alumina ile sinterize edilmesi sonucu dayanıklılığının incelenmesi

Three point bending strength of in-ceram core material sinterized with colloidal alumina

Bahadır ERSU
İbrahim TULUNOĞLU
Muhittin YENİGÜL
Pages
71–78
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The mean fracture resistance for groups A and B were 963.75 MPa and 1164 MPa, respectively and the difference between two groups were statistically significant (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the use of a colloidal alumina/inorganic binder on the shear strength of In-Ceram core material.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample and the fracture surface were evaluated with SEM (Scanning Electro Microscope) x600, x800, x1200, and x2000 magnification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The mean fracture resistance for groups A and B were 963.75 MPa and 1164 MPa, respectively and the difference between two groups were statistically significant (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the use of a colloidal alumina/inorganic binder on the shear strength of In-Ceram core material. Methods: Two groups of samples (A & B) were fabricated in accordance with the relevant ISO specification; while the fabrication of group A was conducted in the conventional manner, group B samples were fabricated by using In-Ceram powder and colloidal alumina as binder. Three point bending test was applied on each group. The sample and the fracture surface were evaluated with SEM (Scanning Electro Microscope) x600, x800, x1200, and x2000 magnification. Results: The mean fracture resistance for groups A and B were 963.75 MPa and 1164 MPa, respectively and the difference between two groups were statistically significant (P

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmada In-Ceram kor materyalinin kolloidal alumina ile sinterize edilmesi sonucu dayanıklılığı araştırılmıştır. Metod: Uluslararası standartlar organizasyonunun (ISO) belirlediği ölçülerde 2x4x25 mm boyutlarında In-Ceram kor materyalinden oluşan iki ayrı grup hazırlanmıştır. A grubu örnekleri geleneksel In-Ceram kor yapı hazırlama şekline uygun hazırlanmıştır. B grubu örnekleri ise In-Ceram tozuna inorganik bağlayıcı olarak (binder) kolloidal alumina kullanılarak hazırlanmıştır. Örnekler üç nokta eğilme testine tabi tutulmuştur, ve kırılma yüzeyleri SEM (Scanning Electro Microscope) ile x600, x800, x1200, ve x2000 büyütme ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular ve Sonuç: A grubu örneklerinin kırılma kuvvetleri ortalama 963.75 MPa, B grubu örneklerinin kırılma kuvvetleri ortalama 1164 MPa olarak belirlenmiştir. İstatistiksel açıdan gruplar arasında fark olup olmadığı incelenmiş ve birbirleriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. İki grup arasında istatistiksel açıdan önemli fark (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSU, B., TULUNOĞLU, İ., YENİGÜL, M. (2022). In-ceram tozunun kolloidal alumina ile sinterize edilmesi sonucu dayanıklılığının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg.(. Clinical Dentistry and Research), Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 71–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/528440

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. McLean JW. The science and art of dental ceramics. First ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Chicago, 1979
  2. Jones DW. Development of dental ceramics, An historical perspective. Dent Clin Nort Am; 1985; 29:621-43
  3. Kelly RJ, Nishimura I, Champbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry. Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:18-32
  4. Wohlwend A, Strub JR, Scharer P. Metal ceramic and all-porcelain restorations current considerations. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2:13-26
  5. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:859-64
  6. Hobo S, Iwata T. A new laminate veneer technique using castable apatite ceramic material. I. Theoretical considerations. Quintessence Int 1985; 16:451-457
  7. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowolifle D. Flexure tests on dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9:434-39
  8. Williamson RT, Kovarik RE, Mitchell RJ. Effect of grinding polishing, and overglazing on the flexure strength of a high-leucite feldsphatic porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9:30-7
  9. Geis-Gerstrofer J, Kanjantra P. Zum einfluss der prüfmethode auf die biegefestigkeit von IPS-Empress und In-Ceram. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1992; 47:618-21
  10. Pröbster L, Diehl J. Slip-casting alumina ceramics for crown and bridge restorations. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:1- 8
  11. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS-Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10:478-84
  12. Claus H. VITA In-Ceram, a new system for producing aluminium oxide crown and bridge substructures. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 1990; 16:35-46
  13. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Roumanas E, Torres TJ. Flexural strength of new ceramic materials. J Dent Research 1990; 69:299 (Abstract)
  14. Rinke S, Hüls A, Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy milled all ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:303-10
  15. Shearer B, Grough MB, Setchell DJ. Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In- Ceram crowns. Biomaterials 1996; 17:1891-5
  16. Andrea Y, Cawley JD. Extrusion of Al2O3 ceramics with low organic content. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 1989; 10:773- 783
  17. Mencık J, Strength and fracture of glass and ceramics. Glass science and technology 1992; 12:164-168
  18. Campbell SD, Pelletier DL, Pober RL, Giordano RA. Dimansional and formation analysis of a restorative ceramic and how it Works. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:332- 40
  19. Kappert HF, Knode H, Sch