Journals / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri ve Yenilikçiliğin Önünde Algıladıkları Engeller

Innovativeness Levels and Perceived Barriers to Innovativeness of Nursing Students

Pages
363–371
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was suggested that the content of nursing education should be innovative, creative, entrepreneurial, and use innovative teaching methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Individual innovativeness feature is the major key to successful innovation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. 279 nursing students were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was suggested that the content of nursing education should be innovative, creative, entrepreneurial, and use innovative teaching methods.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hemşirelik eğitimi · Hemşirelik öğrencileri · Kesitsel çalışma

Abstract

Individual innovativeness feature is the major key to successful innovation. An examination of situations perceived as obstacles to innovativeness will help to establish an innovative culture correctly and planned manner. The study was conducted to determine innovativeness level and the obstacles to innovative behavior of nursing students. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. 279 nursing students were included in the study. The demographic form, Individual Innovativeness Scale, and the Barriers to Innovativeness Questionnaire were used for data collection. The average individual innovativeness score of the students was 63.53 ± 8.58, which is a low level of innovativeness. The major barriers of the innovativeness were lack of different lessons to support creativity, not planning adequate activities to support innovation by educational institutions, and inability to reach current information effectively due to lack of knowledge of the foreign language, respectively. As a result of the study, the level of innovativeness of nursing students was low and major barriers of innovativeness were about education. It was suggested that the content of nursing education should be innovative, creative, entrepreneurial, and use innovative teaching methods.

Özet

Bireysel yenilikçilik başarılı inovasyonun anahtarıdır. Yenilikçiliğe engel olarak algılanan durumların incelenmesi, doğru ve planlı bir şekilde yenilikçi bir kültür oluşturulmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Bu araştırma hemşirelik öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik düzeylerini ve yenilikçi davranışlarının önündeki engellerin belirlenmesi için yapılmıştır. Bu araştırma tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel türdedir. Çalışmaya 279 hemşire öğrenci dahil edilmiştir. Verilerin toplanmasında demografik form, Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği ve Yenilikçiliğin Önündeki Engeller Anketi kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin ortalama bireysel yenilikçilik puanı 63.53 ± 8.58 olup düşük yenilikçilik düzeyindedir. Yenilikçiliğin önündeki en büyük engeller, yaratıcılığı desteklemek için farklı derslerin olmaması, eğitim kurumları tarafından inovasyonu desteklemek için yeterli faaliyetlerin planlanmaması ve sırasıyla yabancı dil bilgisinin eksikliğinden dolayı mevcut bilgilere etkili bir şekilde ulaşılamaması olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucuna göre hemşirelik öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik düzeyi düşük ve yenilikçiliğin önündeki başlıca engeller eğitim ile ilgiliydi. Hemşirelik eğitimi içeriğinin yenilikçi, yaratıcı, girişimci olması ve yenilikçi öğretim yöntemleri kullanması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, S. S. (2022). Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri ve Yenilikçiliğin Önünde Algıladıkları Engeller. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 363–371. https://ajindex.com/articles/527372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Braak J. (2001). “Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141-157
  2. Goldsmith RE, Foxall GR. (2003). “The measurement of innovativeness”. L.V. Shavinina (Ed.). The international handbook of innovation. Elsevier Science
  3. Hurt HT, Joseph K, Cook CD. (1977). “Scales for the measurement of innovativeness”. Human Communication Research, 4, 58-65
  4. Rogers ME. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth Edition). New York: Free Press
  5. International Council of Nurses. (2009). “Delivering quality, serving communities: Nurses leading care innovations”. Geneva, Switzerland
  6. Weng RH, Chen WP, Huang CY, Hung CH, Hsu CT. (2016). “Can nurse innovation improve customer perception of service quality and experience?”. Journal of clinical nursing, 25(13-14), 1950-1961
  7. Huang CY, Weng RH, Lo YS. (2014). “Exploring the work performance of innovative nurses in hospitals: the views of nurses, nurse managers and customers”. Taiwan Journal of Public Health 33, 497-512
  8. Weng RH, Huang CY, Huang JA, Wang MH. (2012). “The cross‐level impact of patient safety climate on nursing innovation: a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey”. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(15‐16), 2262-2274
  9. Kalisch BJ, Begeny S. (2010). “Preparation of nursing students for change and innovation”. West J Nurs Res, 32(2), 157-167
  10. Kaya H, Işık B, Şenyuva E, Kaya N. (2012). “Nursing students’ individual and professional values”. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(1), 18-26
  11. Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. (2013). “Exploring the perceived barriers to innovativeness: Views of Turkish pre-service teachers as technology leaders”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 246-265
  12. Lachman VD, Glasgow MES, Donnelly GF. (2009). “Teaching innovation”. Nursing administration quarterly, 33(3), 205-211
  13. Yamane T. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row
  14. Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. (2010). “Individual Innovativeness Scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability”. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38:150-164
  15. Bodur G. (2018). “The relationship between individual innovativeness and entrepreneurship tendency of nursing students”. Journal of Health Science and Profession, 5(2), 139- 148
  16. Ertuğ N, Kaya H. (2017). “Investigating the individual innovativeness profiles and barriers to innovativeness in undergraduate nu