SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Fiberoptic Bronchoscope and ID Disposcope Endoscope in Cohen Endobronchial Blocker Placement

Cohen Endobronşiyal Bloker Yerleştirmesinde Fiberoptik Bronkoskop ve Disposcope Endoskopun Karşılaştırması

Serkan ŞENKAL
Umut KARA
Emin İNCE
Gökhan ÖZKAN
Pages
10–16
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) andDisposcope® endoscope (DE),which is one of the optical imaging methods used in Cohenflexitip bronchial blocker placement.Methods: In this study, a total of 40 patients in whom a bronchial blocker was inserted forone-lung ventilation were randomly assigned into two groups as FOB (n=20) and DE (n=20).Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, Cormack-Lehanegrade, duration and ease of bronchial blocker placement were recorded.Results: The mean bronchial blocker insertion time in the DE group (196±32 sec) wasshorter than the mean BB insertion time in the FOB group (244±21 sec) with a statisticallysignificant intergroup difference (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) andDisposcope® endoscope (DE),which is one of the optical imaging methods used in Cohenflexitip bronchial blocker placement.Methods: In this study, a total of 40 patients in whom a bronchial blocker was inserted forone-lung ventilation were randomly assigned into two groups as FOB (n=20) and DE (n=20).Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, Cormack-Lehanegrade, duration and ease of bronchial blocker placement were recorded.Results: The mean bronchial blocker insertion time in the DE group (196±32 sec) wasshorter than the mean BB insertion time in the FOB group (244±21 sec) with a statisticallysignificant intergroup difference (p
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) andDisposcope® endoscope (DE),which is one of the optical imaging methods used in Cohenflexitip bronchial blocker placement.Methods: In this study, a total of 40 patients in whom a bronchial blocker was inserted forone-lung ventilation were randomly assigned into two groups as FOB (n=20) and DE (n=20).Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, Cormack-Lehanegrade, duration and ease of bronchial blocker placement were recorded.Results: The mean bronchial blocker insertion time in the DE group (196±32 sec) wasshorter than the mean BB insertion time in the FOB group (244±21 sec) with a statisticallysignificant intergroup difference (p
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) andDisposcope® endoscope (DE),which is one of the optical imaging methods used in Cohenflexitip bronchial blocker placement.Methods: In this study, a total of 40 patients in whom a bronchial blocker was inserted forone-lung ventilation were randomly assigned into two groups as FOB (n=20) and DE (n=20).Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, Cormack-Lehanegrade, duration and ease of bronchial blocker placement were recorded.Results: The mean bronchial blocker insertion time in the DE group (196±32 sec) wasshorter than the mean BB insertion time in the FOB group (244±21 sec) with a statisticallysignificant intergroup difference (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) andDisposcope® endoscope (DE),which is one of the optical imaging methods used in Cohenflexitip bronchial blocker placement.Methods: In this study, a total of 40 patients in whom a bronchial blocker was inserted forone-lung ventilation were randomly assigned into two groups as FOB (n=20) and DE (n=20).Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, Cormack-Lehanegrade, duration and ease of bronchial blocker placement were recorded.Results: The mean bronchial blocker insertion time in the DE group (196±32 sec) wasshorter than the mean BB insertion time in the FOB group (244±21 sec) with a statisticallysignificant intergroup difference (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Cohen fleksitip bronşiyal bloker yerleştirilmesinde kullanılan optik görüntüleme yöntemlerinden, fiberoptik bronkoskop (FOB) ve Disposcope® endoskopu (DE) karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, tek akciğer ventilasyonu için bronşiyal bloker yerleştirilen 40 hasta randomize olarak FOB grubu (n=20) ve DE grubu (n=20) olmak üzere 2 gruba ayrıldı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, Cormack-Lehane sınıflaması, bronşiyal blokerin yerleştirme süresi ve kolaylığı kaydedildi. Bulgular: DE grubunun ortalama bronşiyal bloker yerleştirilme süresinin (196±32 sn); FOB grubunun bronşiyal bloker yerleştirilme süresine göre (244±21 sn) daha kısa olduğu belirlendi ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENKAL, S., KARA, U., İNCE, E., ÖZKAN, G. (2022). Comparison of Fiberoptic Bronchoscope and ID Disposcope Endoscope in Cohen Endobronchial Blocker Placement. Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 10–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/525976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Campos JH. Progress in lung separation. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15:71-83.
  2. Campos JH. Lung isolation techniques for patients with difficult airway. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:12-7.
  3. Disposcope. Product information. Available at: http:// www.disposcope.com/news.html. Accessed April 10, 2014
  4. Dumans-Nizard V, Liu N, Laloe PA, et al. A comparison of the deflecting-tip bronchial blocker with a wireguided or left-sided double-lumen tube. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:501-5.
  5. Kus A, Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Akgul AG, Solak M, Toker K. A comparison of the EZ-blocker with a Cohen flex-tip blocker for one-lung ventilation. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2014;28(4):896-9.
  6. Zhang H, Li Q. Clinical efficacy of disposcope endoscope in bronchial double-lumen tube intubation. Acta Academiae Medicinae Jiangxi. 2014;9:62-5
  7. Zhang Z, Wang S, Qi B, Li F, Su Z, An L. Efficacy of endobronchial intubation with double-lumen tube using fiberoptic bronchoscope assisted by video laryngoscope. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology. 2016;36(6): 740-3. https://doi.org /10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2016.06.024 8. Park SO, Shin DH, Lee KR, Hong DY, Kim EJ, Baek KJ. Efficacy of the Disposcope endoscope, a new video laryngoscope, for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immo- bilisation by semirigid neck collar: comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope using a simulation study on a manikin. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2013;30:270-4.
  8. Li XH, Sun Z, He LL. Feasibility of comfortable and secure intu- bation achieved with the Disposcope endoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope for patients in whom glottis viewing is difficult. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2015;14:3694-701.
  9. Liu Z, Zhao L, Jia Q, Liang S, Yang X. A comparison of Disposcope endoscope and Fiberoptic bronchoscope during awake orotracheal intubation in obese patients with anticipated difficult airway: a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2018;11(9):9654-61
  10. Kamburoğlu H, Özkan G, Purtuloğlu T, Atım A, Yetim M, İnce ME ve ark. Çift lümenli endotrakeal tüp pozisyonunun doğrulanmasında fiberoptik bronkoskop ile kablosuz video end