Journals / Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Preoperative Evaluation of The Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Nonkardiyak Cerrahi Geçirecek Kardiyovasküler Hastalığı Olan Hastaların Preoperatif Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
16–22
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relationship between the patients’ ASA classes, Goldman scores, cardiac risks, comorbidities, operation types, preoperative cardiac symptoms, and perioperative morbidity and mortality was assessed.Results: The mean age in the group with morbidity (69.3±10.6 years) was significantly higher than that in the group without morbidity (64.0±12.1 years) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Preoperative evaluation of the patients with cardiac problems who will undergo noncardiac surgery is crucial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of our study is to investigate the relationship between cardiac risk determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Goldman scoring system, and the cardiology consultation, and the perioperative mortality and morbidity.Material and Method: Five hundred patients undergoing noncardiac surgery for whom cardiology consultation requested were studied prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relationship between the patients’ ASA classes, Goldman scores, cardiac risks, comorbidities, operation types, preoperative cardiac symptoms, and perioperative morbidity and mortality was assessed.Results: The mean age in the group with morbidity (69.3±10.6 years) was significantly higher than that in the group without morbidity (64.0±12.1 years) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Preoperative evaluation of the patients with cardiac problems who will undergo noncardiac surgery is crucial. The aim of our study is to investigate the relationship between cardiac risk determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Goldman scoring system, and the cardiology consultation, and the perioperative mortality and morbidity.Material and Method: Five hundred patients undergoing noncardiac surgery for whom cardiology consultation requested were studied prospectively. The relationship between the patients’ ASA classes, Goldman scores, cardiac risks, comorbidities, operation types, preoperative cardiac symptoms, and perioperative morbidity and mortality was assessed.Results: The mean age in the group with morbidity (69.3±10.6 years) was significantly higher than that in the group without morbidity (64.0±12.1 years) (p

Özet

Amaç: Nonkardiyak cerrahi geçirecek kardiyak sorunlu hastaların preoperatif değerlendirmesi oldukça kritiktir. Çalışmamızın amacı, Amerikan Anestezistler Derneği (ASA) sınıflaması, Goldman skorlama sistemi ve kardiyoloji konsültasyonu ile belirlenen kardiyak risk ile perioperative mortalite ve morbidite arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Nonkardiyak cerrahi geçirecek, kardiyoloji konsültasyonu istenen 500 hasta prospektif olarak çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların ASA sınıfları, Goldman skorları, kardiyak riskleri, komorbiditeleri, operasyon tipleri, preoperative kardiyak semptomları ile perioperative mortalite ve morbidite arasındaki ilişki değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Morbidite gelişen grupta ortalama yaş (69.3±10.6) morbidite gelişmeyen gruba göre (64.0±12.1) anlamlı olarak yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Koçyiğit, M., Koçyiğit, Ö. I., Can, M. G., Hayırlıoğlu, M. B., Kayhan, Z. (2022). Preoperative Evaluation of The Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 16–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/526004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2258-69.
  2. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Preoperative evaluation and management. Clinical Anesthesia. Fifth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:475-83
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111
  4. Lewin I, Lerner AG, Green SH, Del Guercio LR, Siegel JH. Physical class and physiologic status in the prediction of operative mortality in the aged sick. Ann Surg. 1971;174:217-31.
  5. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:845-50.
  6. Detsky AS, Abrams HB, McLaughlin JR. Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:211-9.
  7. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncariac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.10.1043 8. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, Davila-Roman VG, Gerhard-Herman MD, Holly TA, Kane GC, Marine JE, Nelson MT, Spencer CC, Thompson A, Ting HH, Uretsky BF, Wijeysundera DN; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):77-137
  8. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, Guo Y, Berger JS, Bangalore S. Perioperative Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with noncardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2): 181-7.
  9. Gilbert K, Larocque B, Lawrence T. Prospective evaluation of cardiac risk indices for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:356-9.
  10. Braunwald E. Personal reflections on efforts to reduce ischemic myocardial damage. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 56:332-8.
  11. Vanzetto G,