SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Optic Nerve Head Parameters Measured by Kowa Three Dimensional Non-Mydriatic Retinal Camera and Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph III in Healthy Subjects

Kowa Üç Boyutlu Non-Midriyatik Retinal Kamera ve Heidelberg Retina Tomografi si III ile Ölçülen Optik Sinir Başı Parametrelerinin Sağlıklı Kişilerde Karşılaştırması

Gökçen GÖKÇE
Dorukcan AKINCIOĞLU
Mehmet Talay KÖYLÜ
Gökhan ÖZGE
Tarkan MUMCUOĞLU
Pages
180–186
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However Kowa3D NMRC signifi cantly overestimated the HRT determined cup area, disc area, height variation contour, and rim area (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the optic nerve head (ONH) parameters obtained by KOWA three dimensional (3D) non-mydriatic stereoscopic retinalcamera (NMRC) and Heidelberg retinal tomograph III (HRT) in healthy subjects.Materials and methods: In this study, 72 eyes of 36 healthy subjects were enrolled.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Kowa 3D NMRC and HRT III examinations wereperformed to each subject on the same day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However Kowa3D NMRC signifi cantly overestimated the HRT determined cup area, disc area, height variation contour, and rim area (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the optic nerve head (ONH) parameters obtained by KOWA three dimensional (3D) non-mydriatic stereoscopic retinalcamera (NMRC) and Heidelberg retinal tomograph III (HRT) in healthy subjects.Materials and methods: In this study, 72 eyes of 36 healthy subjects were enrolled. Kowa 3D NMRC and HRT III examinations wereperformed to each subject on the same day. Nine ONH parameters, including vertical cup disc ratio, cup area, disc area, rim area, heightvariation contour, cup volume, rim volume, maximum cup depth, and mean cup depth values of both devices were compared and correlated.Results: Kowa 3D NMRC and HRT revealed similar values for vertical cup disc ratio, cup volume, and rim volume (p>0.05). However Kowa3D NMRC signifi cantly overestimated the HRT determined cup area, disc area, height variation contour, and rim area (p

Özet

Amaç: Kowa üç boyutlu (3D) non-midriyatik retinal kamera (NMRK) ve Heidelberg retinal tomografi III (HRT) ile elde edilen optik sinir başı (OSB) parametrelerinin sağlıklı kişilerde karşılaştırılması. Gereç ve yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya 36 sağlıklı bireyin 72 gözü alındı. Kowa 3D NMRK ve HRT III ölçümleri her kişiye aynı günde yapıldı. Her iki cihazın vertikal çukurluk disk oranı, çukurluk alanı, disk alanı, rim alanı, yükseklik değişkenlik kontürü, çukurluk hacmi, rim hacmi, maksimum çukurluk derinliği ve ortalama çukurluk derinliği değerlerini içeren 9 OSB parametresi kıyaslandı ve korelasyonlarına bakıldı. Bulgular: Kowa 3D NMRK ve HRT vertikal çukurluk disk oranı, çukurluk hacmi ve rim hacmi için benzer değerler bulundu (p>0.05). Bununla birlikte HRT tarafından belirlenen çukurluk alanı, disk alanı, yükseklik değişkenlik kontürü ve rim alanı Kowa 3D NMRK ile daha yüksek ölçüldü. Heidelberg retina tomografi si ile belirlenen ortalama çukurluk derinliği ve maksimum çukurluk derinliği Kowa 3D NMRK ile daha düşük saptandı. İki cihaz arasında vertikal çukurluk disk oranı, çukurluk alanı, disk alanı, çukurluk hacmi, maksimum çukurluk derinliği ve ortalama çukurluk derinliği için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı, yüksek seviyeli korelasyon bulundu (r=0.66-0.83, p0.05). Sonuç: Vertikal çukurluk disk oranını da içeren çoğu OSB parametresi Kowa 3D NMRK ve HRT III ile ölçüldüğünde benzerdir. Kowa 3D NMRK, OSB parametrelerinin monitörizasyonunda potansiyel bir cihazdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, G., AKINCIOĞLU, D., KÖYLÜ, M. T., ÖZGE, G., MUMCUOĞLU, T. (2022). Comparison of Optic Nerve Head Parameters Measured by Kowa Three Dimensional Non-Mydriatic Retinal Camera and Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph III in Healthy Subjects. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 180–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/525771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Klamann M, Grünert A, Maier A-K et al. Comparison of functional and morphological diagnostics in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Ophthalmic research. 2013;49:192-8
  2. Yalvaç I, Altunsoy M, Kohen MC. Glokom Tanısında Heidelberg Retinal Tomografi. Glokom-Katarakt/Journal of Glaucoma-Cataract. 2009;4: 1-9
  3. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of peopl e with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British journal of ophthalmology. 2006;90:262-7
  4. Asaoka R, Iwase A, Tsutsumi T et al. Combining Mu ltiple HRT Parameters Using the ‘Random Forests' Method Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Glaucoma in Emmetropic and Highly Myopic EyesDiag nose Glaucoma Using HRT and Random Forests. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2014;55:2482-90
  5. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Robin AL, Richter RC, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fi ber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous fi eld loss. Archives of ophthalmology. 1991;109(1):77-83
  6. Han JW, Cho SY, Kang KD. Correlation between optic nerve parameters obtained using 3D nonmydriatic retinal camera and optical coherence tomography: interobserver agreement on the disc damage likelihood scal e. Journal of ophthalmology. 2014;2014:931738. doi: 10.1155/2014/931738
  7. Tekeli O. Glokomda optik koherens tomografi. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Ophthalmology Special Topics. 2012;5:46-53
  8. Yokoyama Y, Tanito M, Nitta K et al. Stereoscopic analysis of optic nerve head parameters in primary open angle glaucoma: the glaucoma stereo analysis study. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9:e99138. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0099138
  9. Alhadeff PA, De Moraes CG, Chen M, Raza AS, Ritch R, Hood DC. The association between clinical features seen on fundus photographs and glaucomatous damage detected on visual fi elds and optical coherence tomography scans. Journal of glaucoma. 2017;26(5):498
  10. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(2):215-21
  11. Miglior S, Zeyen T, Hoffmann EM et al. Predictive Value of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters for the Development of Glaucoma in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. American journal of ophthalmology. 2015;159:265-76
  12. Uysal Y, Bayer A, Erdurman C et al. Sensitivity and specifi city of Heidelberg Retinal Tomography II parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucomatous damage: effect of disc size. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2007;35:113-8
  13. Fansi AAK, Boisjoly H, Cha