Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Diagnostic Capacities and Agreement of Devices in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Spectralis OCT, Cirrus OCT and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography 3

Primer Açık Açılı Glokomda Cihazların Tanı Kapasitesi ve Uyumu: Spectralis OCT, Cirrus OCT ve Heidelberg Retinal Tomografi 3

Pages
65–71
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cirrus Cup/Disc ratio had the highest and HRT neuro-retinalrim area had the lowest AUC values.Conclusions: In our study common parameters obtained from different devices had signifi cant differences and none had a perfect AUC value.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate diagnostic capacities of Spectralis Spectral Domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), Cirrus OCT and HeidelbergRetinal Tomography III (HRT) and their agreement for common parameters in primary open angle glaucoma.Materials and Methods: 178 of 100 primary open angle glaucoma patients and 112 eyes of 60 healthy controls underwent testing with HRTIII, Spectralis and Cirrus OCT.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Average and quadrant retinal nerve fi ber layer (RNFL) measurements in all three devices, optic nerve headparameters in HRT and Cirrus were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cirrus Cup/Disc ratio had the highest and HRT neuro-retinalrim area had the lowest AUC values.Conclusions: In our study common parameters obtained from different devices had signifi cant differences and none had a perfect AUC value.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate diagnostic capacities of Spectralis Spectral Domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), Cirrus OCT and HeidelbergRetinal Tomography III (HRT) and their agreement for common parameters in primary open angle glaucoma.Materials and Methods: 178 of 100 primary open angle glaucoma patients and 112 eyes of 60 healthy controls underwent testing with HRTIII, Spectralis and Cirrus OCT. Average and quadrant retinal nerve fi ber layer (RNFL) measurements in all three devices, optic nerve headparameters in HRT and Cirrus were recorded. The area under the curve (AUC) calculations of all parameters were also calculated to assessprimary open angle discrimination.Results: Spectralis OCT average RNFL measurements were higher than Cirrus OCT for both glaucoma and control groups HRT average RNFLmeasurements were higher than both Spectralis and Cirrus OCT devices for both glaucoma and control groups Cirrus and HRT III didn’t haveany agreement except cup volume in both groups and rim are in control group. Cirrus Cup/Disc ratio had the highest and HRT neuro-retinalrim area had the lowest AUC values.Conclusions: In our study common parameters obtained from different devices had signifi cant differences and none had a perfect AUC value.

Özet

Amaç: Primer açık açılı glokom tanısında Spectralis Spectral Domain optik koherens tomografi (OCT), Cirrus OCT ve Heidelberg Retinal Tomografi nin tanı kapasitesinin ve ortak parametreleri için uyumunun değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır Gereç ve Yöntem: Yüz primer açık açılı glokom hastasının 178 gözü ve 60 sağlıklı kontrolün 112 gözüne HRT III, Spectralis ve Cirrus OCT ile görüntüleme uygulandı. Tüm cihazlarda ortalama ve kadran retinal sinir lifi tabakası (RSLT) ölçümleri ve HRT ve Cirrus OCT’de optik sinir başı parametreleri ölçümleri kaydedildi ve cihazlar arasındaki uyum açısından incelendi. Primer açık açılı glokom ayırım gücünü değerlendirmek amacıyla tüm parametreler için AUC (area under the curve: ROC eğrisi altı alan) değerleri de hesaplandı. Bulgular: Hem glokom hem de kontrol grubunda Spectralis OCT’deki ortalama RNFL ölçümleri Cirrus OCT’den daha yüksekti. HRT’deki ortalama RNFL ölçümleri, Spectralis ve Cirrus OCT’nin ikisinden de belirgin olarak daha yüksekti. Cirrus OCT ve HRT arasında her iki grupta optik disk cup(çukurluk) hacmi ve kontrol grubunda rim alanı dışındaki parametrelerde uyum yoktu. Cirrus OCT’de cup/disk oranı en yüksek AUC değerine ve HRT nöro-retinal rim alanı en düşük AUC değeri olan parametreler olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Çalışmamamızda farklı cihazlardan elde edilen ortak parametreler arasında anlamlı farklılıklar vardı ve hiç biri mükemmel AUC değerine sahip değildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİNER, M., POLAT, O. A., YILDIRIM, Y., MİRZA, G. E. (2022). Diagnostic Capacities and Agreement of Devices in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Spectralis OCT, Cirrus OCT and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography 3. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 65–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/525766

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363(9422):1711-20
  2. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Bri J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262-7
  3. Michelessi M, Lucenteforte E, Oddone F, et al. Optic nerve head and fi bre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008803. pub2(11):CD008803
  4. Alasil T, Wang K, Yu F, et al. Correlation of retinal nerve fi ber layer thickness and visual fi elds in glaucoma: A broken stick model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014.doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.014
  5. Ghasia FF, El-Dairi M, Freedman SF, et al. Reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements in adult and pediatric glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2013.doi:10.1097/ IJG.0b013e31829521db
  6. Tan BB, Natividad M, Chua KC, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fi ber layer measurement between 2 spectral domain OCT instruments. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(4):266-73
  7. Leite MT, Rao HL, Weinreb RN, et al. Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fi ber layer thickness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(1):85-92 e81
  8. Leite MT, Rao HL, Zangwill LM, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the Spectralis, Cirrus, and RTVue optical coherence tomography devices in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(7):1334-9
  9. Fanihagh F, Kremmer S, Anastassiou G, et al. Optical coherence tomography, scanning laser polarimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in retinal nerve fi ber layer measurements of glaucoma patients. Open Ophthalmol Journal. 2015;9:41-48
  10. Asaoka R, Strouthidis NG, Kappou V, et al. HRT-3 Moorfi elds reference plane: effect on rim area repeatability and identifi cation of progression. Bri J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(11):1510-1513
  11. Lin SC, Singh K, Jampel HD, et al. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fi ber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(10):1937-49
  12. Chung HK, Han YK, Oh S, et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography measurement reproducibility between children and adults. PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0147448
  13. Lisboa R, Leite MT, Zangwill LM, et al. Diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(11):2261-9
  14. Leung CK, Ye C, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fi ber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreemen